[Bug 612910] New: sensors does not report the correct voltage by IT8720F
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c0 Summary: sensors does not report the correct voltage by IT8720F Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Milestone 7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: Beta-Customer Blocker: --- the program sensors does not report the correct voltage (except Ubat). The entry for the it8712,16,18,20 in the sensors3.conf is also not complete. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c yang xiaoyu <xyyang@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xyyang@novell.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |jdelvare@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c1 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-10 07:38:54 UTC --- /etc/sensors3.conf isn't meant to be complete. If you read the header comment of this file carefully, it says: # This default configuration file only includes statements which do not # differ from one mainboard to the next. Only label, compute and set # statements for internal voltage and temperature sensors are included. So the result you're seeing is exactly as intended, there is no bug. What you need is a custom configuration file for your board. We have such files for some boards, but not all. So, please let me know the vendor and product model of your board, and I'll see what I can do for you. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de Severity|Major |Minor -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c2 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-11 12:15:04 UTC --- Sorry for my English. Ok, # This default configuration file only includes statements which do not # differ from one mainboard to the next. Only label, compute and set # statements for internal voltage and temperature sensors are included., but here it is possible to comment out statements, so it is possible to include examples, which the user then must adapt for his Motherboard. For the it8712, it8716, it8718, it8720 is only the label-statement for VBAT in the sonsors3.conf. If I change the motherboard or buy a new PC I have also several other problems (e.g. check for new drivers, download documentations etc. ). So that examples are very helpful. By a investigation in the Internet I must find out that severals users of the If8720F have the same problem. I self have a GA-890GPA-UD3H from Gigabyte. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-11 13:45:07 UTC --- Including examples isn't the purpose of sensors.conf.default (which is installed as /etc/sensors3.conf). The upstream wiki has many example configuration files at: http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Configurations These are configuration files for specific motherboards, not monitoring chips. A sample configuration for a given chip only makes sense if the manufacturer provides a recommended application circuit, and we do not have any for the IT8720F, so we can't derive a default configuration for that chip. And even if we had, motherboard vendors are free to diverge from these recommendations. We do not have a configuration file for the Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H yet, but I can try and help you writing one. For this, I will need some data. First of all, if you also have Windows running on your system, please install Gigabyte's EasyTune software, and report everything it reports. Then, please write down everything related to hardware monitoring displayed in the BIOS setup screens: labels and values, and when values oscillate, all values ever printed for each item. And lastly, the output of "sensors" at the time being. Again, if some values oscillate, this is a valuable piece of information. Also look for messages in the kernel logs when the it87 driver gets loaded. With this information, I should be able to provide the basis of a configuration file for your board. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|Other |openSUSE 11.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c4 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-13 09:47:39 UTC --- OK, EasyTune5 says: VCORE = 1,340 +3,3V = 3,34 +12V = 12,230 EasyTune6 says: CPU = 1,344 DRAM = 1,488 +3,3V = 3,344 +12V = 12,175 BIOS: VCORE = 1,344 V DDR3 1,5V = 1,488 V +3,3V = 3,312 V +12V = 12,239 V If I change the setting "System Voltage Control" to manual, I get additional Value (by setting normal for all Values): CPU PLL Voltage Control 2,500 V DRAM Voltage Control 1,500 V DDR VTT Voltage Control 0,750 V NB Voltage Control 1,300 V SidePort Mem Volt Control 1,600 V NB/PCIe/PLL Voltage Control 1,800 V Normal CPU Core 1,3500 V The it87 is loaded. sensors says: k10temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter temp1: +34.9°C (high = +70.0°C, crit = +81.0°C) it8720-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +1.07 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in1: +1.49 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in2: +3.31 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in3: +2.99 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in4: +3.09 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in5: +1.97 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +2.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) Vbat: +3.23 V fan1: 1776 RPM (min = 10 RPM) fan2: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM) fan3: 3139 RPM (min = 0 RPM) fan5: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM) temp1: +43.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor temp2: +32.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +70.0°C) sensor = thermal diode temp3: +36.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor cpu0_vid: +0.413 V -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c5 --- Comment #5 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-14 11:48:56 UTC --- in0, in1 and in2 are clearly Vcore, Vdram and +3.3V, respectively, with no scaling needed. The Vcore difference with what the BIOS and EasyTune show can be explained by the fact that Linux scales down the CPU frequency and voltage (CPUFreq). +12V could be either in3 or in4, but I'd rather be in favor of in4, firstly because it matches ITE's recommendations (which I have received meanwhile), secondly because your +12V value is relatively high. Gigabyte apparently didn't use the standard scaling factor (4.00), but I'm used to that by now. in3 would thus be +5V, even if it doesn't show in your BIOS nor in EasyTune. Did you check in the kernel logs when the it87 driver gets loaded? It may confirm this theory. in6 is obviously unused, so we can ignore it. As for the other voltages (in5 and in7), I am clueless. They don't match any of the entries you have in "System Voltage Control". And standard negative voltage (-5V, -12V) computations don't match either. We can leave them without a label. According to the datasheet, in7 is internal, but they don't say what it is monitoring, so it's not that helpful. Lastly, cpu0_vid is wrong. Could be an it87 or hwmon-vid driver bug, but more likely the VID pins are simply not wired on your system. I will attach a preliminary configuration file for your board soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c6 --- Comment #6 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-14 13:51:40 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=368972) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=368972) libsensors configuration file for Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H Put this file into /etc/sensors.d and the output of sensors should be much better. It's not perfect though. You didn't provide any comparison points for temperatures and fans, so it's pure guess work at the moment. If you provide the temperature and fan readings of the BIOS and EasyTune, we might improve these sections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c7 --- Comment #7 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-15 07:39:49 UTC --- Please also provide a dump of the I/O configuration registers of your chip: $ isadump 0x2e 0x2f 7 If it doesn't report anything, try instead: $ isadump 0x4e 0x4f 7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c8 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-20 15:47:07 UTC --- The both isadump-commands gets all ffh back. Here is the new output from sensors: k10temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter temp1: +33.5°C (high = +70.0°C, crit = +81.0°C) it8720-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter Vcore: +1.07 V (min = +0.78 V, max = +1.50 V) Vdram: +1.49 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) +3.3V: +3.33 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.47 V) +5V: +5.03 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +12.24 V (min = +11.41 V, max = +12.62 V) in5: +1.95 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +2.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) Vbat: +3.22 V CPU Fan: 1626 RPM (min = 1000 RPM) Sys Fan: 2227 RPM (min = 1000 RPM) temp1: +43.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor CPU Temp: +30.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +70.0°C) sensor = thermal diode temp3: +35.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor cpu0_vid: +0.413 V But here is new problem: If here is a setting not correct - e.g. the Fan_min to high - an I get a ALARM, I can the sound not turn of with a correct value in sensor3.conf and a sensors -s. I can the sound only turn of with a reboot of the computer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c9 --- Comment #9 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-20 17:05:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8)
The both isadump-commands gets all ffh back.
Oops, my bad. I forgot that the configuration register space needs to be unlocked before it can be accessed. Please try instead: $ isadump -k 0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55 0x2e 0x2f 7 or $ isadump -k 0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55 0x4e 0x4f 7
But here is new problem: If here is a setting not correct - e.g. the Fan_min to high - an I get a ALARM, I can the sound not turn of with a correct value in sensor3.conf and a sensors -s. I can the sound only turn of with a reboot of the computer.
This is expected. In order to stop the beeping, you must clear the alarm flags, and this is done by _reading_ from the chip, not by writing to it. So, after changing the limits in the configuration file, and running "sensors -s", you must run "sensors" again. If the alarm condition is gone, the beeping will stop. Note that you can also disable beeping altogether, using the in0_beep, temp1_beep and fan1_beep sysfs files. libsensors doesn't support this feature yet. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c10 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-21 10:03:17 UTC ---
and this is done by _reading_ from the chip, not by writing to it. So, after changing the limits in the configuration file, and running "sensors -s", you must run "sensors" again. If the alarm condition is gone, the beeping will stop.
No, it has not stopped. First by the reboot of the computer. Sorry, the isadump take a time. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c11 --- Comment #11 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-21 13:55:21 UTC --- So, the isadump -k 0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55 0x2e 0x2f 7 says: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 87 20 08 00 00 00 fb 00 41 20 00 00 01 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 60: 00 00 02 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 70: 00 00 00 38 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 63 00 40 01 00 00 00 c0: 00 88 00 01 20 00 00 00 00 81 00 00 20 00 00 00 d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3e 3e 7e f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 26 00 00 01 00 00 fc 00 00 00 The isadump -k 0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55 0x4e 0x4f 7 give all 0xffh back. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c12 --- Comment #12 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-22 09:44:28 UTC --- The dump confirms that in3 is +5V (bit 0 of register 0x2c is set). So you should definitely see a message in the logs saying so when you load the it87 driver. Please double check, this is the third time I ask. Surprisingly, in7 isn't mapped to 5VSB internally (bit 1 of register 0x2c isn't set). Given that there is no physical pin on the IT8720F for in7, I don't get the idea. This explains why the value reported as in7 makes no sense. The more surprising is that, according to the datasheet, this bit should be set by default. So either the datasheet is wrong, or the BIOS explicitly disables this feature for a reason I don't grasp. You may try the following command sequence as root to enable 5VSB monitoring internally, and see if you get a better output for in7: # rmmod it87 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x87 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x01 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x55 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x55 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x07 # isaset -y -f 0x2f 7 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x2c # isaset -y -f 0x2f 0x03 # isaset -y -f 0x2e 0x02 # isaset -y -f 0x2f 0x02 # modprobe it87 You must type all commands correctly, otherwise it won't work and you may get into trouble. And please report the log messages after loading the it87 driver. If the above works for you, then I may let the it87 driver do it automatically for the IT8720F on all boards. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c13 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-22 11:47:32 UTC --- Sorry the only message to the it87 that I have found is in the /var/log/message: Jun 22 13:13:49 linux-a113 kernel: [ 25.993607] it87: Found IT8720F chip at 0x228, revision 8 Jun 22 13:13:49 linux-a113 kernel: [ 25.993622] it87: in3 is VCC (+5V) Jun 22 13:13:49 linux-a113 kernel: [ 25.993626] it87: Beeping is supported This appears several times. If I apply the isaset commands (and ignore several message data mismas) the sensors command says: k10temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter temp1: +32.5°C (high = +70.0°C, crit = +81.0°C) it8720-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter Vcore: +1.07 V (min = +0.78 V, max = +1.50 V) Vdram: +1.49 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) +3.3V: +3.33 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.47 V) +5V: +5.03 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V) +12V: +12.24 V (min = +11.41 V, max = +12.62 V) in5: +1.95 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +3.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) Vbat: +3.22 V CPU Fan: 1573 RPM (min = 1000 RPM) Sys Fan: 2163 RPM (min = 1000 RPM) temp1: +42.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor CPU Temp: +29.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +70.0°C) sensor = thermal diode temp3: +34.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor cpu0_vid: +0.413 V and in the /var/log/meassage is: Jun 22 13:18:51 linux-a113 kernel: [ 327.700610] it87: Found IT8720F chip at 0x228, revision 8 Jun 22 13:18:51 linux-a113 kernel: [ 327.700625] it87: in3 is VCC (+5V) Jun 22 13:18:51 linux-a113 kernel: [ 327.700627] it87: in7 is VCCH (+5V Stand-By) Jun 22 13:18:51 linux-a113 kernel: [ 327.700630] it87: Beeping is supported -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c14 --- Comment #14 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-22 19:51:07 UTC --- The messages in /var/log/message are exactly what I expected, thanks. After the isaset commands, in7 looks much better, and you can get the right output with the following settings in your configuration file: label in7 "5VSB" compute in7 @ * (6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1) I believe that the driver should change the device configuration that way automatically for the IT8720F. I don't understand why it isn't the default, I'll ask my ITE contact about it. All the reports I've seen on the web had the wrong value too, so I have a serious doubt about the claims in the datasheet. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c15 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #368972|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #15 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-24 08:23:10 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=371411) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=371411) libsensors configuration file for Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H Updated configuration file, with proper in7 settings. Requires an updated in7 driver (or the isaset command sequence documented above.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c16 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de | --- Comment #16 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-24 08:27:05 UTC --- I think we're almost done here. You can either add the isaset sequence to /etc/init.d/after.local, or build and use the standalone it87 driver from: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/it87/ I've posted the in7 fix upstream already, and will get it merged into kernel 2.6.35 (and from there, to 2.6.34-stable.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c17 --- Comment #17 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-24 09:23:32 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=371417) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=371417) it87 driver fix for in7 on Gigabyte boards with IT8720F -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #371411|1 |0 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c19 --- Comment #19 from Michael Schmidt <MSchmidt_glz@gmx.de> 2010-06-24 09:31:33 UTC --- OK, I check it, but it takes a time. But here is a other problem. I think here should be a "VBAT"_min. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c20 --- Comment #20 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-24 11:48:05 UTC --- No, in8 (Vbat) has no limit settings. This is a hardware limitation of all the IT87xxF chips, nothing the it87 driver can do. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c21 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #21 from Jean Delvare <jdelvare@novell.com> 2010-06-24 12:30:40 UTC --- Fix committed to the openSUSE 11.2, 11.3 and Factory kernels. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612910#c22 --- Comment #22 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (612910) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/42060 11.3:Test / kernel-source https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/42266 Factory / kernel-source https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/42378 11.3:Test / kernel-source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com