[Bug 503151] New: firefox crashes with scim/skim enabled
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 Summary: firefox crashes with scim/skim enabled Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox AssignedTo: bnc-team-mozilla@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: burnus@gmx.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- This is with Firefox 3.5 beta4 under KDE 3 or KDE 4 with scim/skim enabled. Result: firefox crashes. Using QT_IM_MODULE= XMODIFIERS= GTK_IM_MODULE= firefox it works. Result of running it with firefox -d gdb -no-remote -safe-mode 0x00007ffff6c4d645 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff6c4d645 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff6c4ec33 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007ffff6c898e8 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007ffff6c8f118 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #4 0x00007ffff6c90c76 in free () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #5 0x00007fffddbb2c89 in ?? () from /lib64/libnsl.so.1 #6 0x00007ffff7bcfed3 in pthread_once () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #7 0x00007fffddbb2df1 in _nsl_default_nss () from /lib64/libnsl.so.1 #8 0x00007fffdd99db51 in _nss_nis_setpwent () from /lib64/libnss_nis.so.2 #9 0x00007fffdddbd4b9 in ?? () from /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2 #10 0x00007fffdddbd626 in _nss_compat_setpwent () from /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2 #11 0x00007ffff6cfe3aa in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #12 0x00007ffff6cbb88c in setpwent () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #13 0x00007fffde26c62e in scim::scim_get_home_dir() () from /usr/lib64/libscim-1.0.so.8 #14 0x00007fffde22ed4c in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libscim-1.0.so.8 #15 0x00007fffde230cd5 in scim::scim_global_config_read(std::string const&, int) () from /usr/lib64/libscim-1.0.so.8 #16 0x00007fffde25f7b7 in scim::scim_get_default_socket_timeout() () from /usr/lib64/libscim-1.0.so.8 #17 0x00007fffde25c712 in scim::PanelClient::PanelClientImpl::PanelClientImpl() -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c1 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfgang@rosenauer.org Found By|--- |Beta-Customer --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-05-18 00:27:08 MDT --- There is another crash in Firefox on Factory when trying to print or print preview which seems to be related: #0 0xffffe422 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7c58990 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7c5a2c8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0xb7c946b5 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0xb7c9a644 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0xb7c9bf2c in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 #6 0xae756e2c in ?? () from /lib/libnsl.so.1 #7 0xb7fa6fe0 in pthread_once () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #8 0xae756fc4 in _nsl_default_nss () from /lib/libnsl.so.1 #9 0xaf10957e in _nss_nis_setpwent () from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2 #10 0xb1512121 in ?? () from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2 #11 0xb15122ae in _nss_compat_setpwent () from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2 #12 0xb7d1066d in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 #13 0xb7cc6a87 in setpwent () from /lib/libc.so.6 #14 0xaf1eea75 in cupsUser () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 #15 0xaf1d1359 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 #16 0xaf1d2d33 in cupsGetDests2 () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 #17 0xaf1d30fe in cupsGetDests () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 #18 0xb6f3fe51 in nsPSPrinterList::GetPrinterList (this=0xbfffa5a8, aList=@0xbfffa5d4) at nsPSPrinters.cpp:105 Both traces hit pthread_once () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 _nsl_default_nss () from /lib/libnsl.so.1 _nss_nis_setpwent () from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2 I somehow doubt that there is a Firefox issue (or is it?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User kairo@kairo.at added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c2 Robert Kaiser <kairo@kairo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kairo@kairo.at --- Comment #2 from Robert Kaiser <kairo@kairo.at> 2009-05-18 05:34:32 MDT --- It seems to me as if this started happening when we switched to libgcc 4.4 - or at least about that time.
From what I could see in gdb, it looks like some problem with memory access, and it started happening on the Firefox/Mozilla side (all Mozilla products, actually) with the switch of the main binary to jemalloc - that's why Firefox 3.0.x didn't show it while Firefox 3.5 does.
Even new Firefox/Mozilla source on openSUSE 11.1 works fine, so I suspect that somehow the new libgcc (or something we picked up at a similar time) and jemalloc don't like each other when it comes to memory management. Firefox somehow accesses GTK stuff for print and print preview, AFAIK, maybe that helps to find a clue as to what is exactly happening. In https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473428 where I mentioned this on the Mozilla side, a run under valgrind was requested, but I don't really have a clue how to find anything out there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c3 --- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-05-18 06:06:04 MDT --- urgs, found bug 477061 which is worrying -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c4 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbaudis@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-05-19 02:01:15 MDT --- Petr, is the issue in mozilla stuff the same as bug 477061 ? In contrary to Robert's comment Firefox 3.0.x already uses jemalloc but apparently didn't expose the issue (at least up to 11.1 (not sure for Factory)). I've opened the following bug upstream: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493541 In case you want to add anything of interest. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c5 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bnc-team-mozilla@forge.prov |pbaudis@novell.com |o.novell.com | --- Comment #5 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-05-19 02:51:24 MDT --- This is our bug, please close the upstream bugreport. I have seen this already happen with Gentoo Firefox, but thought we are lucky about this. Well, apparently not anymore. :-( We currently do not support custom malloc() implementation in NSS due to our patch to open NSS modules deep-bound (that is meant to protect the main process from library namespace pollution by libraries the NSS module depends on - e.g. Thunderbird depended on one kind of OpenLDAP library, while nss_ldap depended on an entirely incompatible one). This causes the main process to use the custom malloc(), but the NSS module to use the stock free(). I will try to see this fixed. In the meantime, can the custom malloc be turned off temporarily? In 11.1, Firefox worked fine even with this bug in glibc... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User kairo@kairo.at added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c6 --- Comment #6 from Robert Kaiser <kairo@kairo.at> 2009-05-19 03:26:47 MDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
In contrary to Robert's comment Firefox 3.0.x already uses jemalloc but apparently didn't expose the issue (at least up to 11.1 (not sure for Factory)).
We (mozilla) did use jemalloc there but not for the main binary yet, that was only introduced in Firefox 3.5 et al. and apparently was the point where this was triggered. (In reply to comment #5)
We currently do not support custom malloc() implementation in NSS due to our patch to open NSS modules deep-bound
Is this a patch to the Mozilla NSS or elsewhere (libc or so)? I'm seeing the same problem with my own builds of Mozilla applications (all of Firefox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird) which don't use system-installed Mozilla NSS but the one that comes with the Mozilla code, i.e. I recompile that one as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c7 --- Comment #7 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-05-19 03:38:18 MDT --- NSS the Name Security Switch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User kairo@kairo.at added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c8 --- Comment #8 from Robert Kaiser <kairo@kairo.at> 2009-05-19 04:27:52 MDT --- OK, makes sense. I was just confused because Mozilla's "Network Security Services" library is called NSS as well. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dholbert@mozilla.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c9 Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dholbert@mozilla.com --- Comment #9 from Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> 2009-05-19 10:00:57 MDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
In the meantime, can the custom malloc be turned off temporarily?
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking, but you can disable the custom malloc in your own builds by adding: ac_add_options --disable-jemalloc to your .mozconfig file at build time. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c10 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-05-19 10:05:17 MDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #5)
In the meantime, can the custom malloc be turned off temporarily?
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking, but you can disable the custom malloc in your own builds by adding: ac_add_options --disable-jemalloc to your .mozconfig file at build time.
Petr, as Daniel said but what means "temporarily" in your question to give me an idea if it makes sense to go through that since it really has to be temporary? It's not really an option to ship mozilla like that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c11 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 - Medium |P2 - High --- Comment #11 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-05-19 10:19:43 MDT --- I don't want to argue with you, I'm merely wondering, why isn't it an option? What does the custom malloc() actually do? I will bump the priority further. :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dholbert@mozilla.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c12 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> 2009-05-19 10:36:06 MDT --- Among other benefits, it's got lower memory fragmentation than standard malloc implementations, which means we have lower overall memory usage. (e.g. 22% less memory usage on Windows Vista [1]) [1] http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/03/11/firefox-3-memory-usage/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c13 --- Comment #13 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-05-19 10:38:52 MDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
I don't want to argue with you, I'm merely wondering, why isn't it an option? What does the custom malloc() actually do?
Here are some references why mozilla started to use jemalloc as malloc replacement: http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/03/11/firefox-3-memory-usage/ http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/12/04/vlad-and-analysis-of-dtrace-was-used/ http://blog.pavlov.net/2008/02/27/jemalloc-on-trunk-linux-edition/ So it's (probably) not an option because: 1. it helps to keep memory usage under control (at least given the above analysis are correct 2. you never know what can be changed from upstream builds (legally because of their trademark policy) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|firefox crashes with |firefox crashes in glibc's |scim/skim enabled |nss because of the jemalloc | |integration -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c14 --- Comment #14 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-06-21 02:09:08 MDT --- Petr, could you please have a short look at bug 512624 since I guess that's the same issue? Please dupe it if so. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c15 --- Comment #15 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-06-21 11:59:09 MDT --- *** Bug 512624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512624 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c16 --- Comment #16 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-06-23 23:35:25 MDT --- I've run firefox-3.5rc2 from mozilla for three days with no crash yet maybe this is a clue to something? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User kairo@kairo.at added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c17 --- Comment #17 from Robert Kaiser <kairo@kairo.at> 2009-06-24 07:10:07 MDT --- (In reply to comment #16)
I've run firefox-3.5rc2 from mozilla for three days with no crash yet maybe this is a clue to something?
No, it probably isn't. 1) As long as you don't try things like print or print preview, we know that there's no problem, as you don't interact with glibc memory management. 2) We don't need clues, we know where the problem is. We're just waiting for the relevant people to remove or fix the patch in glibc NSS. Petr, any progress on that? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c18 --- Comment #18 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-06-24 07:34:46 MDT --- Print preview works in the mozilla version, if I switch back to the suse version it crashes immediately. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User aj@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c19 Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aj@novell.com --- Comment #19 from Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> 2009-07-01 05:41:49 MDT --- It crashes on one of my 11.1/x86-64 systems as well - but not on the other one. Should I open a new bugreport or is this the same? aj@reger:~> firefox *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x00007f13c751df50 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7f13c7a18118] /lib64/libnss_nis.so.2(_nss_nis_getpwnam_r+0x101)[0x7f13ba26a381] /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2[0x7f13ba47316b] /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2(_nss_compat_getpwnam_r+0x227)[0x7f13ba473437] /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwnam_r+0xed)[0x7f13c7a44a7d] /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x7f13c2c8486c] /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_get_user_name+0xad)[0x7f13c2c85fad] /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0[0x7f13bd648b0d] /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_type_create_instance+0x46a)[0x7f13c2f0915a] /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x7f13c2eed6fb] /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_newv+0x253)[0x7f13c2eedd33] /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_new_valist+0x327)[0x7f13c2eee887] /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_new+0xcc)[0x7f13c2eee9cc] /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0(gnome_client_new_without_connection+0x12)[0x7f13bd648682] /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0[0x7f13bd649890] /usr/lib64/libgnome-2.so.0(gnome_program_preinit+0x196)[0x7f13bcd59346] /usr/lib64/libgnome-2.so.0[0x7f13bcd5a27b] /usr/lib64/libgnome-2.so.0(gnome_program_initv+0x2d)[0x7f13bcd5a58d] /usr/lib64/libgnome-2.so.0(gnome_program_init+0xe4)[0x7f13bcd5a684] /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.1.0/libxul.so[0x7f13c58aaf94] /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.1.0/libxul.so(XRE_main+0xe7e)[0x7f13c58a4735] /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox[0x402599] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x7f13c79c2586] /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox[0x401f59] ======= Memory map: ======== 00400000-00416000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 734803 /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox 00615000-00616000 r--p 00015000 08:02 734803 /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox 00616000-00617000 rw-p 00016000 08:02 734803 /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox 00617000-00618000 rw-p 00617000 00:00 0 [heap] 7f13ba059000-7f13ba064000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550664 /lib64/libnss_files-2.9.so 7f13ba064000-7f13ba263000 ---p 0000b000 08:02 1550664 /lib64/libnss_files-2.9.so 7f13ba263000-7f13ba264000 r--p 0000a000 08:02 1550664 /lib64/libnss_files-2.9.so 7f13ba264000-7f13ba265000 rw-p 0000b000 08:02 1550664 /lib64/libnss_files-2.9.so 7f13ba265000-7f13ba26f000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550672 /lib64/libnss_nis-2.9.so 7f13ba26f000-7f13ba46e000 ---p 0000a000 08:02 1550672 /lib64/libnss_nis-2.9.so 7f13ba46e000-7f13ba46f000 r--p 00009000 08:02 1550672 /lib64/libnss_nis-2.9.so 7f13ba46f000-7f13ba470000 rw-p 0000a000 08:02 1550672 /lib64/libnss_nis-2.9.so 7f13ba470000-7f13ba477000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550621 /lib64/libnss_compat-2.9.so 7f13ba477000-7f13ba676000 ---p 00007000 08:02 1550621 /lib64/libnss_compat-2.9.so 7f13ba676000-7f13ba677000 r--p 00006000 08:02 1550621 /lib64/libnss_compat-2.9.so 7f13ba677000-7f13ba678000 rw-p 00007000 08:02 1550621 /lib64/libnss_compat-2.9.so 7f13ba678000-7f13ba680000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550498 /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0 7f13ba680000-7f13ba87f000 ---p 00008000 08:02 1550498 /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0 7f13ba87f000-7f13ba880000 r--p 00007000 08:02 1550498 /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0 7f13ba880000-7f13ba881000 rw-p 00008000 08:02 1550498 /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0 7f13ba881000-7f13ba893000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1909592 /usr/lib64/libgnome-keyring.so.0.1.1 7f13ba893000-7f13baa93000 ---p 00012000 08:02 1909592 /usr/lib64/libgnome-keyring.so.0.1.1 7f13baa93000-7f13baa94000 r--p 00012000 08:02 1909592 /usr/lib64/libgnome-keyring.so.0.1.1 7f13baa94000-7f13baa95000 rw-p 00013000 08:02 1909592 /usr/lib64/libgnome-keyring.so.0.1.1 7f13baa95000-7f13baa97000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550684 /lib64/libutil-2.9.so 7f13baa97000-7f13bac96000 ---p 00002000 08:02 1550684 /lib64/libutil-2.9.so 7f13bac96000-7f13bac97000 r--p 00001000 08:02 1550684 /lib64/libutil-2.9.so 7f13bac97000-7f13bac98000 rw-p 00002000 08:02 1550684 /lib64/libutil-2.9.so 7f13bac98000-7f13bacab000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1550679 /lib64/libresolv-2.9.so 7f13bacab000-7f13baeab000 ---p 00013000 08:02 1550679 /lib64/libresolv-2.9.so 7f13baeab000-7f13baeac000 r--p 00013000 08:02 1550679 /lib64/libresolv-2.9.so 7f13baeac000-7f13baead000 rw-p 00014000 08:02 1550679 /lib64/libresolv-2.9.so 7f13baead000-7f13baeaf000 rw-p 7f13baead000 00:00 0 7f13baeaf000-7f13baebb000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 1909649 /usr/lib64/libavahi-common.so.3.5.0 7f13baebb000-7f13bb0ba000 ---p 0000c000 08:02 1909649 /usr/lib64/libavahi-common.so.3.5.0 7f13bb0ba000-7f13bb0bb000 r--p 0000b000 08:02 1909649 /usr/lib64/libavahi-common.so.3.5.0 7f13bb0bb000-7f13bb0bc000 rw-p 0000c000 08:02 1909649 /usr/lib64/libavahi-common.so.3.5.0 7f13bb0bc000-7f13bb0cc000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 315420 /usr/lib64/libavahi-client.so.3.2.4 7f13bb0cc000-7f13bb2cb000 ---p 00010000 08:02 31542/usr/bin/firefox: line 126: 11728 Aborted $MOZ_PROGRAM "$@" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c20 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |aj@novell.com --- Comment #20 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-07-01 08:05:58 MDT --- Interesting! Yes, this is probably the same, but I think this is the first report of this happening on 11.1 as well. Are you using everything stock, or custom version of firefox or something else? Do you use NIS on both of the 11.1 machines? Is this on program startup or later? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User aj@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c21 Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|aj@novell.com | --- Comment #21 from Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> 2009-07-01 08:20:49 MDT --- NIS is used only on the machine where it fails. I use openSUSE 11.1 plus KDE 4.2.4 + Firefox 3.5. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c22 --- Comment #22 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-07-01 12:22:18 MDT --- Hmm, so I guess we will need a maint. update for 11.1/SLE11 as well. Good to know. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c23 --- Comment #23 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-07-02 03:54:56 MDT --- Upstream reopened https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493541 because it also can have bad effects on browser plugins like Flash. There is a proposed patch for mozilla here: https://bug493541.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=386469 Would that help to fix our name service crashes as well? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c24 --- Comment #24 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-07-03 00:17:23 MDT --- The OBS mozilla repo now has the patched xulrunner191 package. Let's see if it fixes the crashes we've seen. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c25 --- Comment #25 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-07-03 01:02:57 MDT --- No crash with bs firefox print preview anymore. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c26 --- Comment #26 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-07-03 06:29:56 MDT --- Hmm, apparently someone still has an issue in bug 519168 :-( The packages he's using already have that proposed patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c27 --- Comment #27 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-07-04 01:40:05 MDT --- My system is factory, the print preview crash wasn't intermittent it happened all the time with the previous factory firefox + libraries. I don't know how firefox-3.5rc2 from mozilla's site differs from opensuse's version but I've used it for about 8 days with no crashes at all and print preview works. Now firefox + libs from build service mozilla factory appears to be working perfectly with no print preview issue at least and no crashes so far. Maybe bug 519168 is due to a difference between factory and 11.1? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User aj@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c28 --- Comment #28 from Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> 2009-07-06 03:48:35 MDT --- Wolfgang, the new version works for me so far - thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c29 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matti.kukkola@gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-07-07 11:37:41 MDT --- *** Bug 519831 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519831 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c30 --- Comment #30 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-07-08 13:17:12 MDT --- Seems mozilla quietly sorted this problem out, no more browser crashes although I did experience a thunderbird crash and then updated to build service thunderbird. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c31 --- Comment #31 from Dave Plater <dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-07-20 04:01:07 MDT --- I have used bs firefox heavily for quite a while now with no problems at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 User wolfgang@rosenauer.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c32 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #32 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2009-08-21 11:37:19 MDT --- Apparently this is fixed on the Firefox side. Closing -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c33 --- Comment #33 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2014-09-09 16:08:00 UTC --- openSUSE-SU-2014:1100-1: An update that fixes 475 vulnerabilities is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 104586,354469,385739,390992,417869,41903,429179,439841,441084,455804,484321,503151,518603,527418,528406,529180,542809,559819,576969,582276,586567,593807,603356,622506,637303,642502,645315,649492,657016,664211,667155,689281,701296,712224,714931,720264,726758,728520,732898,733002,737533,744275,746616,747328,749440,750044,755060,758408,765204,771583,777588,783533,786522,790140,796895,804248,808243,813026,819204,825935,833389,840485,847708,854370,861847,868603,875378,876833,881874,887746,894201,894370 CVE References: CVE-2007-3089,CVE-2007-3285,CVE-2007-3656,CVE-2007-3670,CVE-2007-3734,CVE-2007-3735,CVE-2007-3736,CVE-2007-3737,CVE-2007-3738,CVE-2008-0016,CVE-2008-1233,CVE-2008-1234,CVE-2008-1235,CVE-2008-1236,CVE-2008-1237,CVE-2008-3835,CVE-2008-4058,CVE-2008-4059,CVE-2008-4060,CVE-2008-4061,CVE-2008-4062,CVE-2008-4063,CVE-2008-4064,CVE-2008-4065,CVE-2008-4066,CVE-2008-4067,CVE-2008-4068,CVE-2008-4070,CVE-2008-5012,CVE-2008-5014,CVE-2008-5016,CVE-2008-5017,CVE-2008-5018,CVE-2008-5021,CVE-2008-5022,CVE-2008-5024,CVE-2008-5500,CVE-2008-5501,CVE-2008-5502,CVE-2008-5503,CVE-2008-5506,CVE-2008-5507,CVE-2008-5508,CVE-2008-5510,CVE-2008-5511,CVE-2008-5512,CVE-2009-0040,CVE-2009-0771,CVE-2009-0772,CVE-2009-0773,CVE-2009-0774,CVE-2009-0776,CVE-2009-1571,CVE-2009-3555,CVE-2010-0159,CVE-2010-0173,CVE-2010-0174,CVE-2010-0175,CVE-2010-0176,CVE-2010-0182,CVE-2010-0654,CVE-2010-1121,CVE-2010-1196,CVE-2010-1199,CVE-2010-1200,CVE-2010-1201,CVE-2010-1202,CVE-2010-1203,CVE-2010-1205,CVE-2010-1211,CVE-2010-1 212,CVE-2010-1213,CVE-2010-1585,CVE-2010-2752,CVE-2010-2753,CVE-2010-2754,CVE-2010-2760,CVE-2010-2762,CVE-2010-2764,CVE-2010-2765,CVE-2010-2766,CVE-2010-2767,CVE-2010-2768,CVE-2010-2769,CVE-2010-3166,CVE-2010-3167,CVE-2010-3168,CVE-2010-3169,CVE-2010-3170,CVE-2010-3173,CVE-2010-3174,CVE-2010-3175,CVE-2010-3176,CVE-2010-3178,CVE-2010-3179,CVE-2010-3180,CVE-2010-3182,CVE-2010-3183,CVE-2010-3765,CVE-2010-3768,CVE-2010-3769,CVE-2010-3776,CVE-2010-3777,CVE-2010-3778,CVE-2011-0053,CVE-2011-0061,CVE-2011-0062,CVE-2011-0069,CVE-2011-0070,CVE-2011-0072,CVE-2011-0074,CVE-2011-0075,CVE-2011-0077,CVE-2011-0078,CVE-2011-0080,CVE-2011-0081,CVE-2011-0083,CVE-2011-0084,CVE-2011-0085,CVE-2011-1187,CVE-2011-2362,CVE-2011-2363,CVE-2011-2364,CVE-2011-2365,CVE-2011-2371,CVE-2011-2372,CVE-2011-2373,CVE-2011-2374,CVE-2011-2376,CVE-2011-2377,CVE-2011-2985,CVE-2011-2986,CVE-2011-2987,CVE-2011-2988,CVE-2011-2989,CVE-2011-2991,CVE-2011-2992,CVE-2011-3000,CVE-2011-3001,CVE-2011-3005,CVE-2011-3026,CVE-2 011-3062,CVE-2011-3101,CVE-2011-3232,CVE-2011-3648,CVE-2011-3650,CVE-2011-3651,CVE-2011-3652,CVE-2011-3654,CVE-2011-3655,CVE-2011-3658,CVE-2011-3659,CVE-2011-3660,CVE-2011-3661,CVE-2011-3663,CVE-2012-0441,CVE-2012-0442,CVE-2012-0443,CVE-2012-0444,CVE-2012-0445,CVE-2012-0446,CVE-2012-0447,CVE-2012-0449,CVE-2012-0451,CVE-2012-0452,CVE-2012-0455,CVE-2012-0456,CVE-2012-0457,CVE-2012-0458,CVE-2012-0459,CVE-2012-0460,CVE-2012-0461,CVE-2012-0462,CVE-2012-0463,CVE-2012-0464,CVE-2012-0467,CVE-2012-0468,CVE-2012-0469,CVE-2012-0470,CVE-2012-0471,CVE-2012-0472,CVE-2012-0473,CVE-2012-0474,CVE-2012-0475,CVE-2012-0477,CVE-2012-0478,CVE-2012-0479,CVE-2012-0759,CVE-2012-1937,CVE-2012-1938,CVE-2012-1940,CVE-2012-1941,CVE-2012-1944,CVE-2012-1945,CVE-2012-1946,CVE-2012-1947,CVE-2012-1948,CVE-2012-1949,CVE-2012-1951,CVE-2012-1952,CVE-2012-1953,CVE-2012-1954,CVE-2012-1955,CVE-2012-1956,CVE-2012-1957,CVE-2012-1958,CVE-2012-1959,CVE-2012-1960,CVE-2012-1961,CVE-2012-1962,CVE-2012-1963,CVE-2012-1967, CVE-2012-1970,CVE-2012-1972,CVE-2012-1973,CVE-2012-1974,CVE-2012-1975,CVE-2012-1976,CVE-2012-3956,CVE-2012-3957,CVE-2012-3958,CVE-2012-3959,CVE-2012-3960,CVE-2012-3961,CVE-2012-3962,CVE-2012-3963,CVE-2012-3964,CVE-2012-3966,CVE-2012-3967,CVE-2012-3968,CVE-2012-3969,CVE-2012-3970,CVE-2012-3971,CVE-2012-3972,CVE-2012-3975,CVE-2012-3978,CVE-2012-3980,CVE-2012-3982,CVE-2012-3983,CVE-2012-3984,CVE-2012-3985,CVE-2012-3986,CVE-2012-3988,CVE-2012-3989,CVE-2012-3990,CVE-2012-3991,CVE-2012-3992,CVE-2012-3993,CVE-2012-3994,CVE-2012-3995,CVE-2012-4179,CVE-2012-4180,CVE-2012-4181,CVE-2012-4182,CVE-2012-4183,CVE-2012-4184,CVE-2012-4185,CVE-2012-4186,CVE-2012-4187,CVE-2012-4188,CVE-2012-4191,CVE-2012-4192,CVE-2012-4193,CVE-2012-4194,CVE-2012-4195,CVE-2012-4196,CVE-2012-4201,CVE-2012-4202,CVE-2012-4204,CVE-2012-4205,CVE-2012-4207,CVE-2012-4208,CVE-2012-4209,CVE-2012-4212,CVE-2012-4213,CVE-2012-4214,CVE-2012-4215,CVE-2012-4216,CVE-2012-4217,CVE-2012-4218,CVE-2012-5829,CVE-2012-5830,CVE-2012- 5833,CVE-2012-5835,CVE-2012-5836,CVE-2012-5837,CVE-2012-5838,CVE-2012-5839,CVE-2012-5840,CVE-2012-5841,CVE-2012-5842,CVE-2012-5843,CVE-2013-0743,CVE-2013-0744,CVE-2013-0745,CVE-2013-0746,CVE-2013-0747,CVE-2013-0748,CVE-2013-0749,CVE-2013-0750,CVE-2013-0752,CVE-2013-0753,CVE-2013-0754,CVE-2013-0755,CVE-2013-0756,CVE-2013-0757,CVE-2013-0758,CVE-2013-0760,CVE-2013-0761,CVE-2013-0762,CVE-2013-0763,CVE-2013-0764,CVE-2013-0766,CVE-2013-0767,CVE-2013-0768,CVE-2013-0769,CVE-2013-0770,CVE-2013-0771,CVE-2013-0773,CVE-2013-0774,CVE-2013-0775,CVE-2013-0776,CVE-2013-0780,CVE-2013-0782,CVE-2013-0783,CVE-2013-0787,CVE-2013-0788,CVE-2013-0789,CVE-2013-0793,CVE-2013-0795,CVE-2013-0796,CVE-2013-0800,CVE-2013-0801,CVE-2013-1669,CVE-2013-1670,CVE-2013-1674,CVE-2013-1675,CVE-2013-1676,CVE-2013-1677,CVE-2013-1678,CVE-2013-1679,CVE-2013-1680,CVE-2013-1681,CVE-2013-1682,CVE-2013-1684,CVE-2013-1685,CVE-2013-1686,CVE-2013-1687,CVE-2013-1690,CVE-2013-1692,CVE-2013-1693,CVE-2013-1694,CVE-2013-1697,CVE- 2013-1701,CVE-2013-1709,CVE-2013-1710,CVE-2013-1713,CVE-2013-1714,CVE-2013-1717,CVE-2013-1718,CVE-2013-1719,CVE-2013-1720,CVE-2013-1722,CVE-2013-1723,CVE-2013-1724,CVE-2013-1725,CVE-2013-1728,CVE-2013-1730,CVE-2013-1732,CVE-2013-1735,CVE-2013-1736,CVE-2013-1737,CVE-2013-1738,CVE-2013-5590,CVE-2013-5591,CVE-2013-5592,CVE-2013-5593,CVE-2013-5595,CVE-2013-5596,CVE-2013-5597,CVE-2013-5599,CVE-2013-5600,CVE-2013-5601,CVE-2013-5602,CVE-2013-5603,CVE-2013-5604,CVE-2013-5609,CVE-2013-5610,CVE-2013-5611,CVE-2013-5612,CVE-2013-5613,CVE-2013-5614,CVE-2013-5615,CVE-2013-5616,CVE-2013-5618,CVE-2013-5619,CVE-2013-6629,CVE-2013-6630,CVE-2013-6671,CVE-2013-6672,CVE-2013-6673,CVE-2014-1477,CVE-2014-1478,CVE-2014-1479,CVE-2014-1480,CVE-2014-1481,CVE-2014-1482,CVE-2014-1483,CVE-2014-1484,CVE-2014-1485,CVE-2014-1486,CVE-2014-1487,CVE-2014-1488,CVE-2014-1489,CVE-2014-1490,CVE-2014-1491,CVE-2014-1492,CVE-2014-1493,CVE-2014-1494,CVE-2014-1497,CVE-2014-1498,CVE-2014-1499,CVE-2014-1500,CVE-2014-1502 ,CVE-2014-1504,CVE-2014-1505,CVE-2014-1508,CVE-2014-1509,CVE-2014-1510,CVE-2014-1511,CVE-2014-1512,CVE-2014-1513,CVE-2014-1514,CVE-2014-1518,CVE-2014-1519,CVE-2014-1522,CVE-2014-1523,CVE-2014-1524,CVE-2014-1525,CVE-2014-1526,CVE-2014-1528,CVE-2014-1529,CVE-2014-1530,CVE-2014-1531,CVE-2014-1532,CVE-2014-1533,CVE-2014-1534,CVE-2014-1536,CVE-2014-1537,CVE-2014-1538,CVE-2014-1539,CVE-2014-1540,CVE-2014-1541,CVE-2014-1542,CVE-2014-1543,CVE-2014-1544,CVE-2014-1545,CVE-2014-1547,CVE-2014-1548,CVE-2014-1549,CVE-2014-1550,CVE-2014-1552,CVE-2014-1553,CVE-2014-1555,CVE-2014-1556,CVE-2014-1557,CVE-2014-1558,CVE-2014-1559,CVE-2014-1560,CVE-2014-1561,CVE-2014-1562,CVE-2014-1563,CVE-2014-1564,CVE-2014-1565,CVE-2014-1567 Sources used: openSUSE 11.4 (src): MozillaFirefox-24.8.0-127.1, mozilla-nss-3.16.4-94.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503151#c34 --- Comment #34 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (503151) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/13571 Factory / mozilla-xulrunner191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com