[Bug 676048] New: PackageKit shows xml tags in licenses
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048#c0 Summary: PackageKit shows xml tags in licenses Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: RC 2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: vuntz@novell.com ReportedBy: jmason@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de CC: aj@novell.com Found By: Community User Blocker: No Created an attachment (id=416898) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=416898) screenshot When updating a package through PackageKit that includes a license, many licenses include html-ish xml tags, which are not processed by the license viewer. See attachment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048#c1 Vincent Untz <vuntz@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |jw@novell.com --- Comment #1 from Vincent Untz <vuntz@novell.com> 2011-03-01 20:54:43 UTC --- I'm actually not sure if there's a standard format for this, or if these xml tags are something openSUSE specific. Jürgen: any idea about that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048#c2 Juergen Weigert <jw@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |jw@novell.com, | |ro@novell.com InfoProvider|jw@novell.com | --- Comment #2 from Juergen Weigert <jw@novell.com> 2011-03-01 21:29:10 UTC --- Yes, those tags are SUSE-specific. You are actually seeing a variant with very little markup ('pre' at top and bottom). In other cases, you may see a lot of <p>, <li>, <ul>, <br> etc... PDB actually exports two versions of the license text, one with markup, the other one as plain text. The richtext version is intended for yast. I am not sure if PackageKit should see the other one, or should understand the markup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048#c3 --- Comment #3 from Juergen Weigert <jw@suse.com> 2012-01-26 23:58:16 UTC --- One way or the other: We need basic HTML-style markup support to Packagekit. It is safe to strip unimplemented tags, but the basic set mentioned above should not be too hard to draft. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676048#c4 Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|vuntz@suse.com |bnc-team-screening@forge.pr | |ovo.novell.com --- Comment #4 from Vincent Untz <vuntz@suse.com> 2012-07-09 11:56:58 UTC --- I think there are more chances that we end up with what is suggested in bug 730975. Closing as duplicate, even if it's not really a duplicate (suse-specific xml vs some other markup format) -- I think the non-suse-specific way is the right way forward. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 730975 *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com