[Bug 966999] New: IPv6 Privacy Extensions don't work with NetworkManager
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 Bug ID: 966999 Summary: IPv6 Privacy Extensions don't work with NetworkManager Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.1 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse.org Reporter: mcflyers@onlinehome.de QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0 Build Identifier: IPv6 Privacy Extensions don't work with NetworkManager in Leap 42.1 Reproducible: Always I tested it on native machine, also in a virtual machine with Virtualbox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c1 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wbauer@tmo.at Component|KDE Workspace (Plasma) |GNOME Assignee|opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse. |bnc-team-gnome@forge.provo. |org |novell.com --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> --- I doubt that this is a bug in KDE... Reassigning to GNOME, the maintainers of NetworkManager in openSUSE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c2 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar@opensuse.org, | |mcflyers@onlinehome.de Flags| |needinfo?(mcflyers@onlineho | |me.de) --- Comment #2 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Achim Wirtz from comment #0)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0 Build Identifier:
IPv6 Privacy Extensions don't work with NetworkManager in Leap 42.1
Where did you set it up? Using nm-connection-editor ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c3 Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> --- I can confirm this problem. This was on a system installed from openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e.x86_64-42.1.1.iso and using NetworkManager (default for Li-f-e). Network connection uses ethernet. In the NetworkManager settings for the connection, I configured the privacy options for IPv6 to prefer the temporary address. However, I am seeing only the permanent IPv6 address. The file "/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/Wired connection 1" contains (among other things): --- begin quote --- [ipv6] dns-search= ip6-privacy=2 method=auto --- end quote --- Note that the system has been rebooted several times since the configuration was set. On my main desktop, where I use "wicked", privacy options are working properly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c4 Eberhard Harbrink <harbrink@bluewin.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harbrink@bluewin.ch --- Comment #4 from Eberhard Harbrink <harbrink@bluewin.ch> --- In reply to Wolfang Bauer: the bug also exists in KDE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c5 --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> --- (In reply to Eberhard Harbrink from comment #4)
In reply to Wolfang Bauer: the bug also exists in KDE.
And what's your point? If it is a problem in NetworkManager, it will of course also exist in KDE if you are using NetworkManager in KDE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c6 --- Comment #6 from Eberhard Harbrink <harbrink@bluewin.ch> --- (In reply to Wolfgang Bauer from comment #5)
(In reply to Eberhard Harbrink from comment #4)
In reply to Wolfang Bauer: the bug also exists in KDE.
And what's your point?
If it is a problem in NetworkManager, it will of course also exist in KDE if you are using NetworkManager in KDE.
Ok, that was a misunderstanding from my side ;-) I interpreted your remark that way, that you won't experience the bug when you are using kde, and I only wanted to point out, that I get this problem too using kde. Which code is responsible for the bug, I don't know. I'm only a user ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c7 Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it --- Comment #7 from Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> --- I can confirm this bug. Everything works fine if OpenSuse is configure to use wickedd. Can we expect a fix for Leaf 42.1 or should we wait the next version? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c8 --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> --- To cut a long story short: I am not convinced it's a bug in NetworkManager. Network manager has supported privacy extensions for about 2 years now. After some digging I found this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705170#c5 The point is, in my case: ) NM fails to give network interface any temporary address 2) NM gives network interface an IPv6 address as /128 and not /64 3) NM prints a warning in logs that says "libnl does not support extended IFA_FLAGS ..." Basically it behaves exactly as described in the post I quoted. I'd start looking into libnl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c9 --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> --- UPDATE I have update both libnl3 and libnl-config 3.2.25 (it's the official stable release for openSUSE 13.2) and now everything looks fine. Can we have 3.2.25 for leap 42.1 too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c10 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fcrozat@suse.com, | |sreeves@suse.com --- Comment #10 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- Scott, Frederic, libnl3 in Leap 42.1 is a SLE12 package. Can we have this checked? As Lorenzo confirms, the fix is 'somewhere' between 3.2.23 (shipped in Leap 42.1) and 3.2.25 (tested by Lorenzo) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c11 --- Comment #11 from Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #10)
Scott, Frederic, libnl3 in Leap 42.1 is a SLE12 package. Can we have this checked? As Lorenzo confirms, the fix is 'somewhere' between 3.2.23 (shipped in Leap 42.1) and 3.2.25 (tested by Lorenzo)
I'm a bit reluctant to update to libnl3 3.2.25 in SLE12, since it will require a lot of ressources on our side and it adds new API. Fedora has released 3.2.24 as an update in F20 to fix Privacy Extensions (rh#1047139) so maybe we could narrow our research around which exact commit we can extract to fix the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c12 --- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> --- It's this one: http://git.infradead.org/users/tgr/libnl.git/commit/dcc0baac020e033c4325e4d8... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c13 --- Comment #13 from Lorenzo Desole <lorenzodes@fastwebnet.it> --- You'd probably need this too: http://git.infradead.org/users/tgr/libnl.git/commit/b203c89d862a6ae3e82122fe... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c14 Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michaelof@rocketmail.com --- Comment #14 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- Hi all. I've also run into (detected for the first time) this bug today. Leap 42.1, KDE Plasma, Network Manager. As said before, works fine with wicked. With much help from #suse today maybe we can help a little bit: We found a temporary workaround: sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.<INTERFACE>.accept_ra_pinfo=1 will get the "global temporary dynamic" ipv6 address for the desired <INTERFACE>. After a while, be patient. And only until next reboot, not persistent. And we found a very detailed described bug in RedHat, same issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279242 Maybe worth looking is the last entry from Peter Bieringer: "I've played around with a scriptlet and it turned out, that something near/inbetween DHCPv6 will reset accept_ra_pinfo even if tempaddr is enabled" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c15 --- Comment #15 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- are there any activities on this bug? any plans when this issue is going to be fixed? any plans for Leap 42.1? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c16 --- Comment #16 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- again after ~ one month without any answer: are there any activities on this bug? any plans when this issue is going to be fixed? any plans for Leap 42.1? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 Peter Linnell <plinnell@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |plinnell@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 Peter Linnell <plinnell@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Flags|needinfo?(a.wirtz@onlinehom | |e.de) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 Peter Linnell <plinnell@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bnc-team-gnome@forge.provo. |plinnell@suse.com |novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c17 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lnussel@suse.com --- Comment #17 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- CC @Leap 42.2 RM - considering that we still have the same version libnl3 in 42.2, there is a high chance that this bug is still present there -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c18 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P2 - High --- Comment #18 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> --- Peter, since you assigned the bug to you, any update? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c19 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|plinnell@suse.com |sckang@suse.com --- Comment #19 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> --- No respsonse. Jonathan, could you take a look please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c22 --- Comment #22 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> --- ping! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c23 Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|GNOME |Network --- Comment #23 from Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> --- I'll note that this is still an issue with 42.2. (Not sure if the version should be changed for the bug). I am changing the component from "Gnome" to "Network". I'm seeing it with KDE (Plasma 5). I don't think the desktop is relevant. However, this is specific to NetworkManager. I don't see the problem if I use "wicked". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 Stelian Ionescu <sionescu@cddr.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sionescu@cddr.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c24 Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|Leap 42.1 |Leap 42.3 OS|openSUSE 42.1 |openSUSE 42.3 --- Comment #24 from Neil Rickert <nwr10cst-oslnx@yahoo.com> --- This appears to still be an issue with 42.3. Accordingly, I have changed it to reference 42.3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c25 --- Comment #25 from Stelian Ionescu <sionescu@cddr.org> --- According to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705170#c9, the patches to properly support the privacy extensions were released in version 3.2.24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c26 --- Comment #26 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- (In reply to Stelian Ionescu from comment #25)
According to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705170#c9, the patches to properly support the privacy extensions were released in version 3.2.24
Hi Stelian, not sure if I maybe misunderstand something, but your mentioned issue has it's last activity on 2014-01-30, and you mention "version 3.2.24". This bug here was opened long after that on 2016-02-17, and at least 42.2 still has this bug. Looking on my (still 42.2) box I've NetworkManager in 1.0.12.X, and https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/NetworkManager/ lists NetworkManager STABLE as 1.8.0, from "10 May 2017". What is "version 3.2.24"? Gnome itself? If so, how would be the way into KDE? Thanks, Michael -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c27 --- Comment #27 from Stelian Ionescu <sionescu@cddr.org> --- I meant the bug is in libnl3, and the fixing patches were released in version 3.2.24, whereas openSUSE 42.3 is stuck with 3.2.23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c28 --- Comment #28 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- Stelian, thank you very much for clarification! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 kolA flash <kolAflash@kolAhilft.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kolAflash@kolAhilft.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966999#c29 --- Comment #29 from Michael from Offenbach Germany <michaelof@rocketmail.com> --- (In reply to Stelian Ionescu from comment #27)
I meant the bug is in libnl3, and the fixing patches were released in version 3.2.24, whereas openSUSE 42.3 is stuck with 3.2.23
- promised for libln3 > 3.2.24 - 15.0 has libln3 3.3.0 and I'm getting "global temporary dynamic" IPv6 addresses now with NetworkManager, Yabba Dabba Doo!!! Thanks to all who fixed this long-open bug!!! Not sure about the appropriate bugzilla handling of this issue, as it was opened for 42.3, not sure if "wontfix" or "resolved" or something else, so I'm letting this issue open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com