[Bug 672059] New: sane-backends: late version upgrade for 11.4
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c0 Summary: sane-backends: late version upgrade for 11.4 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEEDINFO Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: jsmeix@novell.com ReportedBy: jsmeix@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de InfoProvider: coolo@novell.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- A new sane-backends 1.0.22 version was released right now, see http://www.sane-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2011-02-13: SANE-Backends-1.0.22 has been released. Changes since 1.0.21: * New backends: kvs20xx (Panasonic KV-S20xx), magicolor (Konica-Minolta). * Significant enhancements to several backends. * More than 80 new scanner models supported. * Support many more networked scanners. * Added -A option to scanimage. * Improved build system. * Improved USB support. * Improved udev rules. * Documentation updates. * Bugfixes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Should I start to work on a sane-backends 1.0.22 version upgrade for openSUSE 11.4? Right now I did not do any work for sane-backends 1.0.22. In particular I did not test it. I only need the information whether or not you may accept a sane-backends 1.0.22 version upgrade at all now provided it works at least for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c1 Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |coolo@novell.com InfoProvider|coolo@novell.com | --- Comment #1 from Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> 2011-02-16 11:20:20 CET --- Seriously, I have the impression you're the only one testing scanning during development phase. So I would trust your guts there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c2 Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> 2011-02-16 10:58:21 UTC --- I have the same impression ;-) I will have a look if sane-backends 1.0.22 works for me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c3 Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |Factory --- Comment #3 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> 2011-02-16 16:44:55 UTC --- Submitted to "graphics" via submitrequest 61500 and forwarded this to openSUSE:Factory via submitrequest 61503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c4 Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rh@eng-int.co.uk --- Comment #4 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> 2011-02-22 08:01:09 UTC --- *** Bug 673573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c5 --- Comment #5 from ray herman <rh@eng-int.co.uk> 2011-02-24 05:15:40 GMT --- Thanks for the 1.0.22 packages. I am using then with openSuSE-11.3 and openSuSE-Factory build 1096 KDE x86_64 and Canoscan Lide 110. But (there's always a "but"). Sane requires rw permissions to the device, otherwise e.g. Skanlite reports "Sorry. No devices found". /etc/udev/rules.d/55-libsane.rules (from sane-backends) entries contain 'MODE="0664", GROUP="lp",' which limits access to root and members of "lp". I have added all members of users to "lp" and modified the default user groups. However upgrading from 11.3 to Factory removed users from "lp" again. Perhaps the device group should be set to "users", anyhow the current situation is annoying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c6 --- Comment #6 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> 2011-02-24 08:39:19 UTC --- The access issue in comment #5 is not new but exists "since ever". Feel free to change the udev rules according to your needs in your particular case but by default out-of-the-box we cannot set it to "users" because of security reasons. Furthermore for all-in-one devices (printer + scanner) it must be "lp" because otherwise the CUPS backend could not access the device for printing. For more information have a look at "USB scanner access permissions via udev" in http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Configuring_Scanners -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672059#c7 Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas.roehler@online.de --- Comment #7 from Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de> 2011-08-10 15:34:40 UTC --- Hi, thanks for all the work done! As I'm facing difficulties with configuring scanners all over the years, there should be a solution for Suse-11.4. Presently I get the following error from a script calling scanimage process 2869: arguments to dbus_connection_send() were incorrect, assertion "connection != NULL" failed in file dbus-connection.c line 3294. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-Bus library. D-Bus not built with -rdynamic so unable to print a backtrace MY_SCRIPT: Zeile 57: 2869 Abgebrochen scanimage --device=hpaio:/usb/Officejet_6200_series?serial=CN62LEF0DZ0453 --batch-count=$SEITENZAHL --batch=${BILDV}/${1}${ZFORM}.pnm --resolution=300 -x210mm -y297mm ;;;;;;;; The device --device=hpaio:/usb/Officejet_6200_series?serial=CN62LEF0DZ0453 seems correct, as the same for this printer for years now Also scanlite says: Thread 2 (Thread 0xb0f99b70 (LWP 5186)): [KCrash Handler] #7 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #8 0xb5e098df in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #9 0xb5e0b220 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 #10 0xb5012005 in ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3 #11 0xb5007911 in ?? () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3 #12 0xb4febece in dbus_connection_send () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3 #13 0xb21c1336 in SendScanEvent (device_uri=0x8224314 "hp:/usb/Officejet_6200_series?serial=CN62LEF0DZ0453", event=2000) at scan/sane/io.c:95 #14 0xb21bd34e in hpaioConnPrepareScan (handle=0x8224310) at scan/sane/hpaio.c:747 #15 sane_hpaio_start (handle=0x8224310) at scan/sane/hpaio.c:2837 #16 0xb57731cf in sane_dll_start () from /usr/lib/libsane.so.1 #17 0xb575f60b in sane_start () from /usr/lib/libsane.so.1 #18 0xb74bf97b in ?? () from /usr/lib/libksane.so.0 #19 0xb6b6f3aa in QThreadPrivate::start (arg=0x8232258) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:285 #20 0xb6af4b05 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #21 0xb5eb1d5e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 Thread 1 (Thread 0xb4f4a710 (LWP 5108)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb6af9105 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0xb6b6fab0 in wait (this=0x81cd480, mutex=0x81cd468, time=4294967295) at thread/qwaitcondition_unix.cpp:88 #3 QWaitCondition::wait (this=0x81cd480, mutex=0x81cd468, time=4294967295) at thread/qwaitcondition_unix.cpp:160 #4 0xb6b6ead5 in QThread::wait (this=0x81805e8, time=4294967295) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:683 #5 0xb6c3dd25 in QFileSystemWatcher::~QFileSystemWatcher (this=0x81cd380, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at io/qfilesystemwatcher.cpp:440 #6 0xb6c3ddf2 in QFileSystemWatcher::~QFileSystemWatcher (this=0x81cd380, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at io/qfilesystemwatcher.cpp:456 #7 0xb6c7fd24 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren (this=0x81cd328) at kernel/qobject.cpp:1949 #8 0xb6c84bac in QObject::~QObject (this=0x8195e40, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at kernel/qobject.cpp:945 #9 0xb5911dcb in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsolid.so.4 #10 0xb5911e02 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsolid.so.4 #11 0xb5911c62 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsolid.so.4 #12 0xb5897729 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsolid.so.4 #13 0xb5e0c89f in __run_exit_handlers () from /lib/libc.so.6 #14 0xb5e0c8fd in exit () from /lib/libc.so.6 #15 0xb61f21c8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 #16 0xb717bc49 in KApplication::xioErrhandler(_XDisplay*) () from /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.5 #17 0xb717bc84 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.5 #18 0xb598a4c4 in _XIOError () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 #19 0xb5987c9f in _XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 #20 0xb59783e8 in XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 #21 0xb622f413 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 #22 0xb5540a70 in g_main_context_prepare () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #23 0xb55418e2 in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #24 0xb5541fce in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #25 0xb6c9a7b7 in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0x8064e40, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:424 #26 0xb622f55a in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 #27 0xb6c6b2bd in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=0xbfb90544, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #28 0xb6c6b4e9 in QEventLoop::exec (this=0xbfb90544, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:201 #29 0xb6c6ff90 in QCoreApplication::exec () at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1009 #30 0xb6177104 in QApplication::exec() () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 #31 0x08050ac3 in _start () ;;;;;;; Hope it's some contribution for further progress, thanks all, Andreas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com