http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025 User jw@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025#c1 --- Comment #1 from Juergen Weigert 2009-10-18 16:35:38 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=323009) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=323009) S01halt.patch implementing the sugested fix -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025 User werner@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025#c2 Dr. Werner Fink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jw@novell.com --- Comment #2 from Dr. Werner Fink 2009-10-20 08:36:38 MDT --- Why do you think that SIGALRM yields into a invalid signal specification? The command `trap -l' lists the signal as well as the number 14. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025 User werner@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548025#c4 --- Comment #4 from Dr. Werner Fink 2009-10-20 08:41:42 MDT --- see piece code of vhangup.c: for (ret = num = 1; num < argc; num++) { int fd = open(argv[num], O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY, 0); if (fd < 0) { switch (errno) { case ENOENT: case ENODEV: case ENXIO: ret++; default: break; } continue; } if ((ioctl (fd, TIOCSCTTY, 1) == 0) && (vhangup() == 0)) ret++; close(fd); } .. this should not block even on a serial line ... shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.