https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c1 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Assmann 2007-08-08 03:46:58 MST --- Created an attachment (id=156134) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=156134) linuxrc.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c3 Steffen Winterfeldt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |sassmann@novell.com --- Comment #3 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-08 04:16:07 MST --- It says

mount: /dev/sr0: No such device

looks like a hardware problem to me. Go to console 9 and have a look what '/lbin/fstype /dev/sr0' says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c5 Steffen Winterfeldt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |snwint@novell.com AssignedTo|snwint@novell.com |kernel-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com --- Comment #5 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-08 05:02:22 MST --- Yeah very funny. 1) kernel-ppc64 seems to be our only kernel where isofs is not compiled in 2) the module is named 'isofs' but names itself in /proc/filesystems 'iso9660' IMHO this is a kernel bug. Both strings should be identical. All our fs detection tools return 'iso9660', so I'd say the module should really be named 'iso9660'. But due to 1) nobody has noticed over the last decade or so. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c7 --- Comment #7 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-08 06:01:53 MST --- In earlier versions a number of fs modules were autoloaded in linuxrc (including isofs). I've removed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c9 --- Comment #9 from Olaf Hering 2007-08-08 06:07:39 MST --- also, the kernel has an alias already: /lib/modules/2.6.22.1-ppc64/modules.alias alias iso9660 isofs why does modprobe iso9660 not work in the install initrd? does not look like a kernel bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c11 --- Comment #11 from Olaf Hering 2007-08-08 06:26:15 MST --- Maybe it is now time to use modprobe, write user provided module options to /etc/modprobe.d/linuxrc and copy this file into the installed system in some way. now that all filesystems are finally modules, isofs can be a module as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c13 --- Comment #13 from Olaf Hering 2007-08-08 06:43:27 MST --- minix can be a module as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c15 --- Comment #15 from Olaf Hering 2007-08-08 07:06:08 MST --- so, what should be done in the kernel? rename fs/isofs/ to fs/iso9660 and also change the Makefile to produce an iso9660.ko? I'm sure there are not many convincing arguments for the fact that openSuSE does not want to use modprobe to resolve module aliases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c17 --- Comment #17 from Jeff Mahoney 2007-08-08 09:05:37 MST --- And also completely divergent from mainline. You're welcome to push that change upstream, but I'm afraid "SUSE's fs detection tools identify it as iso9660 and want to load it by that name" is an argument that won't get you very far. I'd imagine most responses would be either "fix your detection tool" or "use modprobe.conf" If we were to change anything in the kernel, it would be to add a field similar to that used by drivers now where the file system identifies itself independently of what the module is called. I'm not confident that would be well received by mainline either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c19 --- Comment #19 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-08 09:44:49 MST --- Just added a workaround for this in linuxrc. If it's nothing you believe needs fixing, close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c21 --- Comment #21 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-10 08:16:54 MST --- as mentioned, linuxrc works now; you can close the bug if you want -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=298345#c23 Steffen Winterfeldt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #23 from Steffen Winterfeldt 2007-08-15 03:23:04 MST --- . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.