[Bug 1093731] New: virtualbox fails to build against Qt 5.11
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731 Bug ID: 1093731 Summary: virtualbox fails to build against Qt 5.11 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Virtualization:Other Assignee: Larry.Finger@gmail.com Reporter: fvogt@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L... [ 1285s] /usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets/qabstractbutton.h:53:7: note: forward declaration of 'class QButtonGroup' [ 1285s] class QButtonGroup; Just missing #includes AFAICT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c1
--- Comment #1 from Larry Finger
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c2
--- Comment #2 from Larry Finger
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c3
Fabian Vogt
In my local builds, Qt 5.10 is being used. What osc options, or changes to the spec file will force 5.11?
It's not in Tumbleweed yet, just build against openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD/standard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c4
--- Comment #4 from Larry Finger
(In reply to Larry Finger from comment #2)
In my local builds, Qt 5.10 is being used. What osc options, or changes to the spec file will force 5.11?
It's not in Tumbleweed yet, just build against openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD/standard.
Unfortunately, I do not know the osc magic incantation for that to happen. My skill set lets me build against Kernel_HEAD_standard, but that is my limit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c5
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Vogt
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #3)
(In reply to Larry Finger from comment #2)
In my local builds, Qt 5.10 is being used. What osc options, or changes to the spec file will force 5.11?
It's not in Tumbleweed yet, just build against openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD/standard.
Unfortunately, I do not know the osc magic incantation for that to happen. My skill set lets me build against Kernel_HEAD_standard, but that is my limit.
The easiest way is to branch from the staging: osc bco --nodevelproject openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD virtualbox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c6
--- Comment #6 from Larry Finger
(In reply to Larry Finger from comment #4)
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #3)
(In reply to Larry Finger from comment #2)
In my local builds, Qt 5.10 is being used. What osc options, or changes to the spec file will force 5.11?
It's not in Tumbleweed yet, just build against openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD/standard.
Unfortunately, I do not know the osc magic incantation for that to happen. My skill set lets me build against Kernel_HEAD_standard, but that is my limit.
The easiest way is to branch from the staging:
osc bco --nodevelproject openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L:DVD virtualbox
After checkout that project, my build gets lots of rpm: error while loading shared libraries: liblua.so.5.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c7
--- Comment #7 from Larry Finger
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c8
--- Comment #8 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c9
--- Comment #9 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c10
--- Comment #10 from Fabian Vogt
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c11
--- Comment #11 from Larry Finger
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c12
--- Comment #12 from Larry Finger
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c13
--- Comment #13 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c16
--- Comment #16 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c17
--- Comment #17 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c18
--- Comment #18 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093731#c19
--- Comment #19 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com