[Bug 1228728] New: system marked as tainted: unmerged-bin
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 Bug ID: 1228728 Summary: system marked as tainted: unmerged-bin Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs@suse.de Reporter: mrueckert@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- ``` State: running Units: 444 loaded (incl. loaded aliases) Jobs: 0 queued Failed: 0 units Since: Thu 2024-08-01 00:58:42 UTC; 8h ago systemd: 256.4+suse.6.g5bba1ebe17 Tainted: unmerged-bin ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728#c2 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Rückert <mrueckert@suse.com> --- if that merge is useful is to be discussed ... but shouldnt it then be "unmerged-sbin" because our /{usr,}bin are merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 Georg Pfuetzenreuter <georg.pfuetzenreuter@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |georg.pfuetzenreuter@suse.c | |om -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728#c7 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh@inai.de --- Comment #7 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> --- systemd: stop using sbin me: you know what, I'm going to use it even harder I'm with Thorsten on this one, less clutter please. About 17% of the stuff in /usr/sbin is daemons anyway which could eventually move to /usr/libexec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 Johannes Kastl <opensuse_buildservice@ojkastl.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensuse_buildservice@ojkas | |tl.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 Andreas Prittwitz <m4ng4n@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |m4ng4n@gmx.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228728#c9 Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de --- Comment #9 from Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> --- (In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #8)
(In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #7)
systemd: stop using sbin me: you know what, I'm going to use it even harder
Exactly. They _always_ know what is the best for me. Mostly, they are wrong.
I'm with Thorsten on this one, less clutter please. About 17% of the stuff in /usr/sbin is daemons anyway which could eventually move to /usr/libexec.
OTOH there are entries like sysctl (checking mostly kernel.core_pattern) and mkfs/fsck (creating/checking a FS in a file) which I have no idea why are not accessible to a user. Every time, I have to prepend /sbin/ to call them.
Can regular users touch block devices? I could see why a user would require sysctl's but there's nothing they can do about it unless they also have root access which negates the reason to call sysctls as user. Some tools work as regular users but require root to be fully working.
Then, there are utils which already have to have: /usr/bin/tcpdump -> ../sbin/tcpdump /usr/bin/ip -> ../sbin/ip
So it's all mess -- both one way and the other.
Again do this fully work as regular user? To me this looks like Fedora enforcing their own decisions on others, politically not a smart move imho. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com