[Bug 555431] New: No suitable ( = simple ) GUI replacement for kinternet - solely based on KDE4 :-(
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431 Summary: No suitable ( = simple ) GUI replacement for kinternet - solely based on KDE4 :-( Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: madworm_de.novell@spitzenpfeil.org QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091016 SUSE/3.5.4-1.1.2 Firefox/3.5.4 Yes, I can use cinternet on the konsole. Yes, it should work with the bloddy Networkmanager, but it confuses me and I don't want to have tons of "auto ETH0", "auto ETH1" hanging around. It gives me the creeps and I truly hate it. Network settings should be static. BTW, I hate wireless too. Using the old but very clean if-up/down GUI gives the user piece of mind, because it is transparent and just works. All that is needed is a nice and simple button for dialin/hangup. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
--- Comment #1 from Stephan Binner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
--- Comment #2 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
--- Comment #3 from Stephan Binner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
--- Comment #4 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c5
Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c6
--- Comment #6 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c
shuang qiu
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c7
Will Stephenson
Even after configuring my eth0/1 the way I like them, it still kept the "auto eth0" and "auto eth1" things in the tray menu - why ?
NetworkManager (the daemon, not knetworkmanager) creates these entries, and knetworkmanager has not yet got a facility to rename/edit/delete them. You can delete the configuration for them in YaST to get rid of them permanently. Another workaround is you can disable NM in YaST, edit system-wide Ethernet settings to your taste, reenable NM, go to /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/ and edit the resulting connection files, changing the id field.
And when I started clicking on them things shifted around and got even more confusing. Instead of adding a check-mark it shifted the connection to the top - why ?
KDE Usability people, supported by GNOME nm-applet's research, told us users want to see active connections first.
And when I told it to limit connection "eth0" to interface "eth0" it still only used eth1
And the DSL link I configured didn't show up in the list at all ... even
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217015 , which I am testing the fix for atm though it connected. That's a new bug - I don't have any DSL hardware to test this though. Since you seem to be 'happy' with qinternet and triage assigned this to me I will hijack this report for this issue.
And I need both of eth0/eth1 up at the same time and not just one of them.
This should work, I have tested this.
I need something simple that doesn't try to be more intelligent than me and doesn't interfere with my wired network settings.
Configuring NM to leave wired alone is demonstrated here: http://peternixon.net/news/2009/06/05/configure-opensuse-networkmanager-to-i... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c8
Stephen Dunn
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c9
--- Comment #9 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c10
--- Comment #10 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c11
--- Comment #11 from Stephen Dunn
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c12
--- Comment #12 from robert spitzenpfeil
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c13
--- Comment #13 from Stephen Dunn
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c14
--- Comment #14 from robert spitzenpfeil
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555431#c15
Stephen Dunn
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com