http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966535 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966535#c10 patrick shanahan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(paka@wahoo.no-ip. | |org) | --- Comment #10 from patrick shanahan --- (In reply to Dr. Werner Fink from comment #7)

(In reply to patrick shanahan from comment #6)

Does this mean that

systemctl enable wpa_supplicant.service

solves the problem? Then a) there could be no

%service_add_pre()

%service_add_post() %service_del_preun() %service_del_postun()

and/or b) the presets below /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/ do not include the enable line for wpa_supplicant.service.

no, but aleviates. Whatever failed to *continue* to provide internet access (wireless in *this* case) SHOULD HAVE CONTINUED. And the open terminal should not have been closed. All of this causes GREATconcern when trying to maintain remote administration! Something is WRONG and needs to be corrected. The mere action of chaning runlevel/active target/whatever it needs to be called MUST not close open terminals and disable internet connection. How else is remote administration to even exist.(In reply to Dr. Werner Fink from comment #7)

(In reply to patrick shanahan from comment #6)

Does this mean that

systemctl enable wpa_supplicant.service

solves the problem? Then a) there could be no

%service_add_pre()

%service_add_post() %service_del_preun() %service_del_postun()

and/or b) the presets below /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/ do not include the enable line for wpa_supplicant.service.

No, it does not solve the problem of the active terminal being closed. It does continue internet connection, but why would this be NECESSARY when one already had internet connection? And why close the terminal? Is remote administration no longer a consideration? SOMEONE has made a change in how systemd handles a changed runlevel w/o ANY consideration for remote administration. And if notice was given, it DEFINITELY was not given where it would be seen by interested parties. systemd has changed and does not as presently constituted correctly handle situations related to what one would consider normal operation or remote administration. systemd HAS changed w/o notice! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.