https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343938#c2 Libor Pechacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpechacek@novell.com --- Comment #2 from Libor Pechacek 2007-11-26 01:59:18 MST --- mid-air, re-sending my comment as is ;) libusb, which does the dirty USBFS job for lsusb, looks up the correct path dynamically (http://libusb.cvs.sourceforge.net/libusb/libusb/linux.c?revision=1.83&view=markup, lines 646-655), so both paths are possible. The upstream man page still mentions the old /proc/ interface (http://linux-usb.cvs.sourceforge.net/linux-usb/usbutils/lsusb.8?revision=1.5&view=markup, line 74), but IMHO lsusb man page should not mention it at all, as it is libusb business to use the correct interface. I propose to leave the information out of the manual page as it is irrelevant for usbutils package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343938#c3 Olaf Hering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Olaf Hering 2007-11-26 08:09:05 MST --- I removed the proc part from the lsusb manpage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.