http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User binner@kde.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c1 Stephan Binner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Other |GNOME AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |bnc-team-gnome@forge.provo. |ovo.novell.com |novell.com --- Comment #1 from Stephan Binner 2009-08-20 02:38:25 MDT --- Starts fine for me on latest Factory GNOME Live-CD. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User pat@indy.rr.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c3 patrick shanahan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|pat@indy.rr.com | --- Comment #3 from patrick shanahan 2009-08-20 07:56:15 MDT --- yes, gegl-0.1.0-8.5 from http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME:/Factory/openSUSE_Factory/ via "zypper dup" w/o complaints. there *is* a versioning problem here. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User pat@indy.rr.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c5 patrick shanahan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #5 from patrick shanahan 2009-08-21 08:02:18 MDT --- Same problem again. wahoo:~ > rpm -qa gimp gegl* gegl-0.0.22-2.23 obs://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Factory/standard/dea646df9126fe1239824339153a2f67-gegl gegl-0_0-0.1.0-8.5 obs://build.opensuse.org/GNOME:Factory/openSUSE_Factory/232449cd63a5d1e8881c84292d8c73d7-gegl gimp-2.6.7-1.1 obs://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Factory/standard/fff8bb7bc89db849d097e4c1bae3388c-gimp wahoo:~ > gimp (gimp:31528): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type `GimpOperationPointFilter' is smaller than the parent type's `GeglOperationPointFilter' class size (gimp:31528): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gimp:31528): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (gimp:31528): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gimp:31528): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot retrieve class for invalid (unclassed) type `<invalid>' -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User vuntz@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c7 Vincent Untz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Vincent Untz 2009-08-21 08:23:17 MDT --- You should look at libgegl-0_0-0 (the library), not at gegl (some programs) or gegl-0_0 (some internal libraries that libgegl can use; aguably a misnamed package). Anyway, GNOME:Factory has been published now (apparently), so just update things again and it should work (it works here now). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User vuntz@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c9 --- Comment #9 from Vincent Untz 2009-08-21 14:58:23 MDT --- Patrick: I can only tell you that gimp in GNOME:Factory is 2.6.7-32.1, according to http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME:/Factory/openSUSE_Factory/i5... I'm using G:F, and I had the issue when you reported it. After upgrading, it's fixed. And I agree there's an issue, but it's that upstream gegl didn't change the version of the library when releasing 0.1.0 -- there's nothing we can do for this. I really don't know how to fix the issue if your zypper doesn't see the new version in GNOME:Factory. From my side, I don't see anything I can do... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User pat@indy.rr.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c11 --- Comment #11 from patrick shanahan 2009-08-23 09:36:33 MDT --- condition no longer exists. GNOME:Factory x86_64 ver 2.6.7-32.2 finally appeared and the zypper updated packages now work. The previous condition where packages matched version wise and gimp Would Not Start is unacceptable. Zypper/rpm should have reported an unmet/package miss-match condition. thankyou -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685 User vuntz@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532685#c13 Vincent Untz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Vincent Untz 2009-08-30 14:21:50 MDT --- (In reply to comment #11)

The previous condition where packages matched version wise and gimp Would Not Start is unacceptable.

As I already explained, this happened because the ABI of the library changed without the soname version being bumped upstream. There's not a lot we can do for this except tell upstream to not do this again. (gegl 0.1.0 is in oS:F now, so the issue won't happen anymore) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.