[Bug 478511] openSUSE kernel claimed to be bad for pulseaudio
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478511 User rkrell@gmx.net added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478511#c30 --- Comment #30 from René Krell <rkrell@gmx.net> 2009-06-04 10:17:21 MDT --- I cannot agree in that conservative point with you. In this terms, you mean that Arts and OSS should be supported for a lifetime? And who does still use kernel 2.0? Things are going forward, and things come (if they er good) and go (if they er no longer needed). The same is with PulseAudio, it is new, and maybe it has issues at this time. But it has good a nice concept and is less complex than ALSA. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio - I really like and support it. The discussion with the kernel should rather lead to: What's the point in adapting this latency time? Any disadvantages, and if yes, any disadvantages for desktop users? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com