https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302275#c1 Cristian Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crrodriguez@novell.com --- Comment #1 from Cristian Rodriguez 2007-08-21 14:31:14 MST --- Again, please , please.. install a copy of 10.3 beta1 and check if your suggestion is already implemented, the software manager stuff has been almost completely rewritten and probably your report dont apply anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302275#c4 Ladislav Slezak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lslezak@novell.com |kkaempf@novell.com Component|YaST2 |libzypp QAContact|jsrain@novell.com |kkaempf@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Ladislav Slezak 2007-08-27 00:01:39 MST --- The error handling is same in 10.3, no change. Yast displays all errors immediately when they occur. I'm to sure if it's reasonable to implement such error collector. At first we would need support in libzypp, yast doesn't know the context of the error message, it doesn't know what to do in step 4) in your proposal. The current implementation displays a popup requesting user feedback, I'm not sure if it's always possible to postpone it later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302275#c9 Klaus Kämpf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #9 from Klaus Kämpf 2007-09-04 05:30:04 MST --- Hmm, it seems to me as if the current behaviour is indeed right. The order in which package are installed (and hence repositories accessed) is determined by the require and prerequire dependencies. So if packages from 'B' (to cite the initial comment) cannot be installed, it probably makes little sense to download packages from 'C'. The current implementation is still limited by the fact that it doesn't account for mirrors (that is if a package is available from more than one repo). If 'B' is unavailable but a mirror, e.g. B1, is alive, the download should automatically retry the mirror thereby minimizing errors. But thats post-103 :-( Maciej, what do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302275#c11 Klaus Kämpf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |schubi@novell.com, kkaempf@novell.com, | |dmacvicar@novell.com, ma@novell.com AssignedTo|kkaempf@novell.com |mls@novell.com --- Comment #11 from Klaus Kämpf 2007-10-10 05:55:25 MST --- Reassign to Michael as he's working on a next-gen solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.