[Bug 732898] New: Firefox is not accessible
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c0 Summary: Firefox is not accessible Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.1 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Firefox AssignedTo: bnc-team-mozilla@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mgorse@suse.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Firefox is inaccessible under OpenSUSE 12.1 unless one sets the old gconf accessibility key or sets GNOME_ACCESSIBILITY=1 in the environment. This is a general problem that should be fixed upstream; I've filed http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693343. The bug is still open at present, although I believe my latest patch there has addressed the comments from various reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c1 Michael Gorse <mgorse@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgorse@suse.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Gorse <mgorse@suse.com> 2011-11-27 18:29:52 UTC --- I've back-ported the bmo#693343 patch to Firefox 8.0 and submitted it to mozilla:Factory as request#93886. We'd probably want the same patch in Thunderbird if we put this in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c2 --- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-11-28 09:34:54 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=464260) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=464260) patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c3 --- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-11-28 09:46:58 UTC --- (From update of attachment 464260)
diff -ur mozilla.orig/accessible/src/atk/nsApplicationAccessibleWrap.cpp mozilla/accessible/src/atk/nsApplicationAccessibleWrap.cpp --- mozilla.orig/accessible/src/atk/nsApplicationAccessibleWrap.cpp 2011-11-06 02:34:00.000000000 -0600 +++ mozilla/accessible/src/atk/nsApplicationAccessibleWrap.cpp 2011-11-26 20:32:59.939341632 -0600 @@ -52,19 +52,17 @@
#include <gtk/gtk.h> #include <atk/atk.h> +#include <dbus/dbus.h>
Including without checking if dbus is enabled/available? That might work in our build configuration but usually I'd like to have patches which could be applied and do the right thing for everyone.
-static bool sATKChecked = false; +static PRBool sATKChecked = PR_FALSE;
Why that? Starting with Firefox 10 PRBool is not used in the mozilla tree (minus nspr/nss) anymore intentionally.
+void +PreInit() +{ + static PRBool sChecked = FALSE;
PRBool again as in following places. Thanks for the work! I'm going to add the patch to the beta builds of Firefox 9 and Thunderbird 9 for now. Those are to be released December, 20th Or do you think we should release an official update based on FF8 and TB8 earlier? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c4 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfgang@rosenauer.org --- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-11-28 12:47:38 UTC --- Patch has been added to mozilla:beta/MozillaFirefox (version 9) and build finished. Feel free to check if it's working correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c5 --- Comment #5 from Michael Gorse <mgorse@suse.com> 2011-11-29 01:49:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3)
+#include <dbus/dbus.h>
Including without checking if dbus is enabled/available? That might work in our build configuration but usually I'd like to have patches which could be applied and do the right thing for everyone.
Right. Thanks for the catch. I've updated the patch on the upstream bug and added the check in a couple places where it was missing.
-static bool sATKChecked = false; +static PRBool sATKChecked = PR_FALSE;
Why that? Starting with Firefox 10 PRBool is not used in the mozilla tree (minus nspr/nss) anymore intentionally.
Looks like I was a bit hasty/over-zealous there; I was trying to make sure it would build, since I was backporting to Firefox 8, but that change at least wasn't needed.
I'm going to add the patch to the beta builds of Firefox 9 and Thunderbird 9 for now. Those are to be released December, 20th Or do you think we should release an official update based on FF8 and TB8 earlier?
Hmm; good question. If we have any other reason for pushing an update, then I think it would be good for it to be included, at least. Btw, is there a good way to test the beta package on 12.1 without installing factory / factory packages? Even the "12.1" package in that repository wants mozilla-nss 3.13, where 12.1 has 3.12, and the repository doesn't seem to include a mozilla-nss package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c6 --- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-11-29 07:20:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5)
Hmm; good question. If we have any other reason for pushing an update, then I think it would be good for it to be included, at least.
Agreed. Currently I see no need to update earlier though.
Btw, is there a good way to test the beta package on 12.1 without installing factory / factory packages? Even the "12.1" package in that repository wants mozilla-nss 3.13, where 12.1 has 3.12, and the repository doesn't seem to include a mozilla-nss package.
mozilla:beta builds/depends on mozilla which contains nss 3.13.1. nss 3.13.1 will be delivered to 12.1 anyway with the update to Firefox 9 as it's a prerequirement. So it's even good for testing if you get it earlier ;-) So the way to get mozilla beta packages is to use both repos (mozilla, mozilla:beta) usually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c7 --- Comment #7 from Michael Gorse <mgorse@suse.com> 2011-11-29 11:13:11 UTC --- I just tested the beta, and it worked fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c8 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-11-29 14:59:31 UTC --- Thanks for checking. Applied for Firefox 9: http://www.rosenauer.org/hg/mozilla/rev/b28670af14d5 Will consider the patch for Thunderbird 9 and SeaMonkey 2.x updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c9 --- Comment #9 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2011-12-20 22:00:22 CET --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (732898) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/97348 11.4 / MozillaFirefox https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/97349 12.1 / MozillaFirefox https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/97350 12.1 / MozillaThunderbird https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/97351 Factory / MozillaFirefox https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/97352 Factory / MozillaThunderbird -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |obs:running:159:important -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c10 Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> 2011-12-21 12:57:42 UTC --- Fixed with Firefox 9 release (bug 737533) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|obs:running:159:important |obs:running:159:important | |obs:running:478:moderate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c11 --- Comment #11 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2012-04-27 13:09:30 UTC --- openSUSE-SU-2012:0567-1: An update that fixes 38 vulnerabilities is now available. Category: security (moderate) Bug References: 712224,714931,720264,726758,728520,732898,733002,744275,746616,747328,749440,750044,755060,758408 CVE References: CVE-2011-1187,CVE-2011-2985,CVE-2011-2986,CVE-2011-2987,CVE-2011-2988,CVE-2011-2989,CVE-2011-2991,CVE-2011-2992,CVE-2011-3005,CVE-2011-3062,CVE-2011-3232,CVE-2011-3651,CVE-2011-3652,CVE-2011-3654,CVE-2011-3655,CVE-2011-3658,CVE-2011-3660,CVE-2011-3661,CVE-2011-3663,CVE-2012-0445,CVE-2012-0446,CVE-2012-0447,CVE-2012-0451,CVE-2012-0452,CVE-2012-0459,CVE-2012-0460,CVE-2012-0467,CVE-2012-0468,CVE-2012-0469,CVE-2012-0470,CVE-2012-0471,CVE-2012-0472,CVE-2012-0473,CVE-2012-0474,CVE-2012-0475,CVE-2012-0477,CVE-2012-0478,CVE-2012-0479 Sources used: openSUSE 12.1 (src): MozillaFirefox-12.0-2.26.1, MozillaThunderbird-12.0-33.20.1, seamonkey-2.9-2.18.1, xulrunner-12.0-2.26.1 openSUSE 11.4 (src): MozillaFirefox-12.0-18.1, MozillaThunderbird-12.0-18.1, seamonkey-2.9-18.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898#c12 --- Comment #12 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2014-09-09 16:15:49 UTC --- openSUSE-SU-2014:1100-1: An update that fixes 475 vulnerabilities is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 104586,354469,385739,390992,417869,41903,429179,439841,441084,455804,484321,503151,518603,527418,528406,529180,542809,559819,576969,582276,586567,593807,603356,622506,637303,642502,645315,649492,657016,664211,667155,689281,701296,712224,714931,720264,726758,728520,732898,733002,737533,744275,746616,747328,749440,750044,755060,758408,765204,771583,777588,783533,786522,790140,796895,804248,808243,813026,819204,825935,833389,840485,847708,854370,861847,868603,875378,876833,881874,887746,894201,894370 CVE References: CVE-2007-3089,CVE-2007-3285,CVE-2007-3656,CVE-2007-3670,CVE-2007-3734,CVE-2007-3735,CVE-2007-3736,CVE-2007-3737,CVE-2007-3738,CVE-2008-0016,CVE-2008-1233,CVE-2008-1234,CVE-2008-1235,CVE-2008-1236,CVE-2008-1237,CVE-2008-3835,CVE-2008-4058,CVE-2008-4059,CVE-2008-4060,CVE-2008-4061,CVE-2008-4062,CVE-2008-4063,CVE-2008-4064,CVE-2008-4065,CVE-2008-4066,CVE-2008-4067,CVE-2008-4068,CVE-2008-4070,CVE-2008-5012,CVE-2008-5014,CVE-2008-5016,CVE-2008-5017,CVE-2008-5018,CVE-2008-5021,CVE-2008-5022,CVE-2008-5024,CVE-2008-5500,CVE-2008-5501,CVE-2008-5502,CVE-2008-5503,CVE-2008-5506,CVE-2008-5507,CVE-2008-5508,CVE-2008-5510,CVE-2008-5511,CVE-2008-5512,CVE-2009-0040,CVE-2009-0771,CVE-2009-0772,CVE-2009-0773,CVE-2009-0774,CVE-2009-0776,CVE-2009-1571,CVE-2009-3555,CVE-2010-0159,CVE-2010-0173,CVE-2010-0174,CVE-2010-0175,CVE-2010-0176,CVE-2010-0182,CVE-2010-0654,CVE-2010-1121,CVE-2010-1196,CVE-2010-1199,CVE-2010-1200,CVE-2010-1201,CVE-2010-1202,CVE-2010-1203,CVE-2010-1205,CVE-2010-1211,CVE-2010-1 212,CVE-2010-1213,CVE-2010-1585,CVE-2010-2752,CVE-2010-2753,CVE-2010-2754,CVE-2010-2760,CVE-2010-2762,CVE-2010-2764,CVE-2010-2765,CVE-2010-2766,CVE-2010-2767,CVE-2010-2768,CVE-2010-2769,CVE-2010-3166,CVE-2010-3167,CVE-2010-3168,CVE-2010-3169,CVE-2010-3170,CVE-2010-3173,CVE-2010-3174,CVE-2010-3175,CVE-2010-3176,CVE-2010-3178,CVE-2010-3179,CVE-2010-3180,CVE-2010-3182,CVE-2010-3183,CVE-2010-3765,CVE-2010-3768,CVE-2010-3769,CVE-2010-3776,CVE-2010-3777,CVE-2010-3778,CVE-2011-0053,CVE-2011-0061,CVE-2011-0062,CVE-2011-0069,CVE-2011-0070,CVE-2011-0072,CVE-2011-0074,CVE-2011-0075,CVE-2011-0077,CVE-2011-0078,CVE-2011-0080,CVE-2011-0081,CVE-2011-0083,CVE-2011-0084,CVE-2011-0085,CVE-2011-1187,CVE-2011-2362,CVE-2011-2363,CVE-2011-2364,CVE-2011-2365,CVE-2011-2371,CVE-2011-2372,CVE-2011-2373,CVE-2011-2374,CVE-2011-2376,CVE-2011-2377,CVE-2011-2985,CVE-2011-2986,CVE-2011-2987,CVE-2011-2988,CVE-2011-2989,CVE-2011-2991,CVE-2011-2992,CVE-2011-3000,CVE-2011-3001,CVE-2011-3005,CVE-2011-3026,CVE-2 011-3062,CVE-2011-3101,CVE-2011-3232,CVE-2011-3648,CVE-2011-3650,CVE-2011-3651,CVE-2011-3652,CVE-2011-3654,CVE-2011-3655,CVE-2011-3658,CVE-2011-3659,CVE-2011-3660,CVE-2011-3661,CVE-2011-3663,CVE-2012-0441,CVE-2012-0442,CVE-2012-0443,CVE-2012-0444,CVE-2012-0445,CVE-2012-0446,CVE-2012-0447,CVE-2012-0449,CVE-2012-0451,CVE-2012-0452,CVE-2012-0455,CVE-2012-0456,CVE-2012-0457,CVE-2012-0458,CVE-2012-0459,CVE-2012-0460,CVE-2012-0461,CVE-2012-0462,CVE-2012-0463,CVE-2012-0464,CVE-2012-0467,CVE-2012-0468,CVE-2012-0469,CVE-2012-0470,CVE-2012-0471,CVE-2012-0472,CVE-2012-0473,CVE-2012-0474,CVE-2012-0475,CVE-2012-0477,CVE-2012-0478,CVE-2012-0479,CVE-2012-0759,CVE-2012-1937,CVE-2012-1938,CVE-2012-1940,CVE-2012-1941,CVE-2012-1944,CVE-2012-1945,CVE-2012-1946,CVE-2012-1947,CVE-2012-1948,CVE-2012-1949,CVE-2012-1951,CVE-2012-1952,CVE-2012-1953,CVE-2012-1954,CVE-2012-1955,CVE-2012-1956,CVE-2012-1957,CVE-2012-1958,CVE-2012-1959,CVE-2012-1960,CVE-2012-1961,CVE-2012-1962,CVE-2012-1963,CVE-2012-1967, CVE-2012-1970,CVE-2012-1972,CVE-2012-1973,CVE-2012-1974,CVE-2012-1975,CVE-2012-1976,CVE-2012-3956,CVE-2012-3957,CVE-2012-3958,CVE-2012-3959,CVE-2012-3960,CVE-2012-3961,CVE-2012-3962,CVE-2012-3963,CVE-2012-3964,CVE-2012-3966,CVE-2012-3967,CVE-2012-3968,CVE-2012-3969,CVE-2012-3970,CVE-2012-3971,CVE-2012-3972,CVE-2012-3975,CVE-2012-3978,CVE-2012-3980,CVE-2012-3982,CVE-2012-3983,CVE-2012-3984,CVE-2012-3985,CVE-2012-3986,CVE-2012-3988,CVE-2012-3989,CVE-2012-3990,CVE-2012-3991,CVE-2012-3992,CVE-2012-3993,CVE-2012-3994,CVE-2012-3995,CVE-2012-4179,CVE-2012-4180,CVE-2012-4181,CVE-2012-4182,CVE-2012-4183,CVE-2012-4184,CVE-2012-4185,CVE-2012-4186,CVE-2012-4187,CVE-2012-4188,CVE-2012-4191,CVE-2012-4192,CVE-2012-4193,CVE-2012-4194,CVE-2012-4195,CVE-2012-4196,CVE-2012-4201,CVE-2012-4202,CVE-2012-4204,CVE-2012-4205,CVE-2012-4207,CVE-2012-4208,CVE-2012-4209,CVE-2012-4212,CVE-2012-4213,CVE-2012-4214,CVE-2012-4215,CVE-2012-4216,CVE-2012-4217,CVE-2012-4218,CVE-2012-5829,CVE-2012-5830,CVE-2012- 5833,CVE-2012-5835,CVE-2012-5836,CVE-2012-5837,CVE-2012-5838,CVE-2012-5839,CVE-2012-5840,CVE-2012-5841,CVE-2012-5842,CVE-2012-5843,CVE-2013-0743,CVE-2013-0744,CVE-2013-0745,CVE-2013-0746,CVE-2013-0747,CVE-2013-0748,CVE-2013-0749,CVE-2013-0750,CVE-2013-0752,CVE-2013-0753,CVE-2013-0754,CVE-2013-0755,CVE-2013-0756,CVE-2013-0757,CVE-2013-0758,CVE-2013-0760,CVE-2013-0761,CVE-2013-0762,CVE-2013-0763,CVE-2013-0764,CVE-2013-0766,CVE-2013-0767,CVE-2013-0768,CVE-2013-0769,CVE-2013-0770,CVE-2013-0771,CVE-2013-0773,CVE-2013-0774,CVE-2013-0775,CVE-2013-0776,CVE-2013-0780,CVE-2013-0782,CVE-2013-0783,CVE-2013-0787,CVE-2013-0788,CVE-2013-0789,CVE-2013-0793,CVE-2013-0795,CVE-2013-0796,CVE-2013-0800,CVE-2013-0801,CVE-2013-1669,CVE-2013-1670,CVE-2013-1674,CVE-2013-1675,CVE-2013-1676,CVE-2013-1677,CVE-2013-1678,CVE-2013-1679,CVE-2013-1680,CVE-2013-1681,CVE-2013-1682,CVE-2013-1684,CVE-2013-1685,CVE-2013-1686,CVE-2013-1687,CVE-2013-1690,CVE-2013-1692,CVE-2013-1693,CVE-2013-1694,CVE-2013-1697,CVE- 2013-1701,CVE-2013-1709,CVE-2013-1710,CVE-2013-1713,CVE-2013-1714,CVE-2013-1717,CVE-2013-1718,CVE-2013-1719,CVE-2013-1720,CVE-2013-1722,CVE-2013-1723,CVE-2013-1724,CVE-2013-1725,CVE-2013-1728,CVE-2013-1730,CVE-2013-1732,CVE-2013-1735,CVE-2013-1736,CVE-2013-1737,CVE-2013-1738,CVE-2013-5590,CVE-2013-5591,CVE-2013-5592,CVE-2013-5593,CVE-2013-5595,CVE-2013-5596,CVE-2013-5597,CVE-2013-5599,CVE-2013-5600,CVE-2013-5601,CVE-2013-5602,CVE-2013-5603,CVE-2013-5604,CVE-2013-5609,CVE-2013-5610,CVE-2013-5611,CVE-2013-5612,CVE-2013-5613,CVE-2013-5614,CVE-2013-5615,CVE-2013-5616,CVE-2013-5618,CVE-2013-5619,CVE-2013-6629,CVE-2013-6630,CVE-2013-6671,CVE-2013-6672,CVE-2013-6673,CVE-2014-1477,CVE-2014-1478,CVE-2014-1479,CVE-2014-1480,CVE-2014-1481,CVE-2014-1482,CVE-2014-1483,CVE-2014-1484,CVE-2014-1485,CVE-2014-1486,CVE-2014-1487,CVE-2014-1488,CVE-2014-1489,CVE-2014-1490,CVE-2014-1491,CVE-2014-1492,CVE-2014-1493,CVE-2014-1494,CVE-2014-1497,CVE-2014-1498,CVE-2014-1499,CVE-2014-1500,CVE-2014-1502 ,CVE-2014-1504,CVE-2014-1505,CVE-2014-1508,CVE-2014-1509,CVE-2014-1510,CVE-2014-1511,CVE-2014-1512,CVE-2014-1513,CVE-2014-1514,CVE-2014-1518,CVE-2014-1519,CVE-2014-1522,CVE-2014-1523,CVE-2014-1524,CVE-2014-1525,CVE-2014-1526,CVE-2014-1528,CVE-2014-1529,CVE-2014-1530,CVE-2014-1531,CVE-2014-1532,CVE-2014-1533,CVE-2014-1534,CVE-2014-1536,CVE-2014-1537,CVE-2014-1538,CVE-2014-1539,CVE-2014-1540,CVE-2014-1541,CVE-2014-1542,CVE-2014-1543,CVE-2014-1544,CVE-2014-1545,CVE-2014-1547,CVE-2014-1548,CVE-2014-1549,CVE-2014-1550,CVE-2014-1552,CVE-2014-1553,CVE-2014-1555,CVE-2014-1556,CVE-2014-1557,CVE-2014-1558,CVE-2014-1559,CVE-2014-1560,CVE-2014-1561,CVE-2014-1562,CVE-2014-1563,CVE-2014-1564,CVE-2014-1565,CVE-2014-1567 Sources used: openSUSE 11.4 (src): MozillaFirefox-24.8.0-127.1, mozilla-nss-3.16.4-94.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|obs:running:159:important |obs:running:478:moderate |obs:running:478:moderate | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732898 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|obs:running:478:moderate | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com