[Bug 527429] New: libeXosip2-3.1.0-46.5: bad number in call to snprintf
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429 Summary: libeXosip2-3.1.0-46.5: bad number in call to snprintf Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dcb314@hotmail.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- I just had a look at factory package libeXosip2-3.1.0-46.5 For source code file libeXosip2-3.1.0/src/eXtl_udp.c around line 220 is the source code for the function udp_tl_learn_port_from_via. I notice the following line of code snprintf (udp_firewall_port, 20, "%s", br->gvalue); but static char udp_firewall_port[10]; so the literal constant 20 looks somewhat optimistic. Suggest new code snprintf (udp_firewall_port, sizeof udp_firewall_port, "%s", br->gvalue); -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429 Marcus Meissner <meissner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |hvogel@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429 User rguenther@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429#c1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenther@novell.com> 2009-10-17 08:54:51 MDT --- David, in case the issues are not introduced by a patch local to openSUSE please report the issues upstream. Packagers, please do not add openSUSE-local patches to fix this kind of errors but forward the bugs upstream and close the bugs as RESOLVED UPSTREAM. Note that it is perfectly fine to have "resource leaks" at the end of a program as the kernel will clean up for you. Manually freeing them only increases binary size and runtime. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527429#c2 Hendrik Vogelsang <hvogel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |UPSTREAM Severity|Normal |Major --- Comment #2 from Hendrik Vogelsang <hvogel@suse.com> 2012-07-20 12:59:24 UTC --- . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com