http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c2 Max Staudt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mstaudt@suse.com --- Comment #2 from Max Staudt --- Thanks for the video, Igor! That's a very helpful way of demonstrating the problem, as well as work around missing terminology for a precise description. Now, onto my questions... 1. Why does the video show a Fujitsu Siemens computer? Your bug report is for a Thinkpad X60? 2. Why do you start and keep pressing/clicking keys at some point? Please give the system a chance to work on its own, and if you interact with it, please make it clear to us. As for the stacktrace visible in the video, I can't read it clearly, but it looks like some modesetting trouble when switching to/from the framebuffer. Since the active screen area looks limited, my guess is that you have two or more monitors connected (note that a screen inside a laptop DOES count as a connected screen, even if the lid is closed). Does the system start with only one screen connected? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c4 --- Comment #4 from Igor Kuznetsov --- And about screens. Only one screen is connected and it is the main screen. Same problem persist on several laptops from Thinkpad X series and Fujitsu S and E series. I have one more Fujitsu E series with external monitor only and it has same problem with a thumbleweed. I decided that maybe problem in kernel and testing another distros, but on void linux (for example) it works correct. And on old opensuse with the old kernel it is work correct to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c6 --- Comment #6 from Igor Kuznetsov --- Created attachment 765301 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=765301&action=edit Xorg.0.log Xorg.0.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c8 Max Staudt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(virex@mail.ru) | --- Comment #8 from Max Staudt --- Thanks for the information! Looking at Xorg.0.log, it is from a machine with Intel Gen3 graphics (8086:27a2). X tries to use the modesetting driver, whose GLAMOR acceleration cannot work on this old hardware. It thus fails like this: [ 88.423] Require OpenGL version 2.1 or later. [ 88.423] (EE) modeset(0): Failed to initialize glamor at ScreenInit() time. Two questions spring to mind: 1) Why isn't the 'intel' DDX (from the xf86-video-intel package) being used here? It should have been auto-installed on this old machine, to provide the best performance. 2) Why isn't modesetting continuing without acceleration, so it can at least provide a basic system? Igor, for a quick fix, you can do one of this: 1) zypper install xf86-video-intel 2) Put the following in your /etc/X11/xorg.conf Section "Device" Identifier "kms gfx" Driver "modesetting" Option "AccelMethod" "none" EndSection Option 1 should give you much better performance. If there are any problems, Option 2 is a very safe fallback, but slow. We'll have to see whether we can reproduce this (whether we have a machine for it...), and look into it. Thanks for reporting this bug, Igor! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c10 Max Staudt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sndirsch@suse.com --- Comment #10 from Max Staudt --- CC Stefan, he knows more about the packages involved. Maybe it's just a hiccup in the .spec file... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c11 --- Comment #11 from Igor Kuznetsov --- Mothod 1 and 2 did not work normal. X11 is started but. Cant load kde or something wrong. And some problem with a size of screen - a few lines do not fit on the screen. https://youtu.be/c8xY5OnJ_8I -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c13 --- Comment #13 from Max Staudt --- Can you please attach Xorg.0.log as it is now after the changes, and also the output of dmesg? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c15 --- Comment #15 from Igor Kuznetsov --- Created attachment 765515 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=765515&action=edit dmesg after fresh install of thumbleweed and loaded with init3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c17 Max Staudt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Flags|needinfo?(virex@mail.ru) | --- Comment #17 from Max Staudt --- Thank you Igor! I had actually reproduced the issue, but unfortunately wrote it into the wrong bug ticket (boo#1086747 Comment 16). Sorry! In any case, now we know we're talking about the same issue, and the fix works on both ends. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087063#c19 Max Staudt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|X.Org |Installation Assignee|mstaudt@suse.com |yast2-maintainers@suse.de QA Contact|xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge. |jsrain@suse.com |provo.novell.com | --- Comment #19 from Max Staudt --- Let's reassign this to the 'Installation' component. If this is incorrect, please reassign as appropriate. The problem at hand is that the package 'xf86-video-intel' is not installed during installation, even though it is correctly pulled in by 'zypper inr' or 'zypper dup' once the system has been installed. The .spec file line that pulls the package in on this system is: Supplements: modalias(xorg-x11-server:pci:v00008086d000029C2sv*sd*bc*sc*i*) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.