http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457#c Leonardo Chiquitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Mono |GNOME AssignedTo|bnc-team-mono@forge.provo.n |bnc-team-gnome@forge.provo. |ovell.com |novell.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457#c2 Dominique Leuenberger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominique.leuenberger@tmf-g | |roup.com --- Comment #2 from Dominique Leuenberger 2010-03-23 22:04:25 UTC --- I'm not sure if re-introducing the deprecated symbols is the right "patch" for any application. In this case you could as well not define GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED during build, and then gtk will also still offer those symbols for you: (from gtkwidget.h: #ifndef GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED /** * GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED: * @wid: a #GtkWidget. * * Evaluates to %TRUE if the widget is realized. * * Deprecated: 2.20: Use gtk_widget_get_realized() instead. */ #define GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED(wid) ((GTK_WIDGET_FLAGS (wid) & GTK_REALIZED) != 0) #endif ) Especially considering that this is an upstream fix :( -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590457#c4 --- Comment #4 from Sanford Armstrong 2010-03-23 22:46:05 UTC --- Dominique, the approach I took in my patch was the smallest possible patch that would maintain compatibility with older versions of gtk+, and still allow me to define GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, as expected of a GNOME module. Please note also that I redefined the macros to use the new functions, so it's not like I'm accessing GTK+ internals or anything. I'm really not sure what's "wrong" with this fix, but if I'm missing something, please do let me know. I'm not much of a C programmer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.