[Bug 571804] New: dmesg: Bad page state in process 'swapper' / swapper Tainted / kernel 2.6.27.39-0.2-xen & 2.6.27.42-0.1-xen
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c0 Summary: dmesg: Bad page state in process 'swapper' / swapper Tainted / kernel 2.6.27.39-0.2-xen & 2.6.27.42-0.1-xen Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Xen AssignedTo: jdouglas@novell.com ReportedBy: heigu@gmx.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created an attachment (id=337322) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=337322) dmesg output User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.0.17) Gecko/2009122116 Firefox/3.0.17 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Since I have updated the kernel first to version 2.6.27.39-0.2-xen and a few days later to version 2.6.27.42-0.1-xen on my xen host, dmesg shows some problems. But the server (AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Dual Core, 4 GB DDR2 RAM, 2x 400 GB SATA II) with four xen guest hosts is running without any other noticeable problem. Here a snippet of the dmesg output (the whole output is attached): Bad page state in process 'swapper' page:ffff880006252bc0 flags:0x4000000000000800 mapping:0000000000000000 mapcount:0 count:0 Trying to fix it up, but a reboot is needed Backtrace: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G 2.6.27.42-0.1-xen #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8020c5e7>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x41/0x58 [<ffffffff804650c8>] dump_stack+0x69/0x6f [<ffffffff802783a6>] bad_page+0x90/0xbd [<ffffffff80278823>] free_hot_cold_page+0xa0/0x232 [<ffffffff803f092d>] skb_release_data+0x6d/0xe9 [<ffffffff803f0819>] __kfree_skb+0x9/0x6f [<ffffffff803fe5b1>] neigh_timer_handler+0x21f/0x312 [<ffffffff8023c542>] run_timer_softirq+0x1ba/0x268 [<ffffffff8023878f>] __do_softirq+0xa1/0x148 [<ffffffff8020c05c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 [<ffffffff8020d303>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xca [<ffffffff8020bb1e>] do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 [<ffffffff802073aa>] 0xffffffff802073aa [<ffffffff8020d9b1>] xen_safe_halt+0x97/0xac [<ffffffff8021075e>] xen_idle+0x2e/0x67 [<ffffffff8020a422>] cpu_idle+0x57/0x93 [<ffffffff80714a65>] start_kernel+0x3be/0x3ca [<ffffffff807141e4>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xb4/0xba reboot doesn't fix the problem Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. reboot Actual Results: no changes - dmesg still reports the same problems -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c Charles Arnold <carnold@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jdouglas@novell.com |jbeulich@novell.com QAContact|qa@suse.de |jdouglas@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c1 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |heigu@gmx.de --- Comment #1 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-01-20 15:35:05 UTC --- And the appearance of these is connected with what? Starting a guest, a guest doing something specific, shutting down a guest, or yet something else? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c2 --- Comment #2 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-01-20 15:40:11 UTC --- Seeing the list of loaded modules might also be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-01-20 16:05:13 UTC --- Hmm, I could see a way for this to happen, but that would imply transmits on behalf of a guest repeatedly taking very long to complete. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c4 --- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-01-20 16:08:30 UTC --- What was the previous kernel version (that you had no issues with)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c5 Frank Frewer <heigu@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |heigu@gmx.de Info Provider|heigu@gmx.de | --- Comment #5 from Frank Frewer <heigu@gmx.de> 2010-01-20 21:30:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1)
And the appearance of these is connected with what? Starting a guest, a guest doing something specific, shutting down a guest, or yet something else? (In reply to comment #3) Hmm, I could see a way for this to happen, but that would imply transmits on behalf of a guest repeatedly taking very long to complete.
Seeing the list of loaded modules might also be helpful. # lsmod Module Size Used by xt_tcpudp 3608 4 xt_physdev 2832 9 iptable_filter 3400 1 ip_tables 19288 1 iptable_filter x_tables 23184 3 xt_tcpudp,xt_physdev,ip_tables bridge 57112 0 stp 3004 1 bridge netbk 198352 0 [permanent] blkbk 27288 0 [permanent] blktap 124660 2 [permanent] xenbus_be 4600 3 netbk,blkbk,blktap snd_pcm_oss 48928 0 snd_mixer_oss 16808 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_seq 61792 0 snd_seq_device 8604 1 snd_seq edd 10272 0 fuse 59504 1 reiserfs 235056 1 ext2 68984 1 loop 17108 8 snd_hda_intel 563028 0 snd_pcm 94576 2 snd_pcm_oss,snd_hda_intel snd_timer 26344 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm snd_page_alloc 9816 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm snd_hwdep 9104 1 snd_hda_intel snd 74152 8 snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_hwdep soundcore 8560 1 snd button 8328 0
All 4 guest should start automatically after reboot of the DomU: on_poweroff="destroy" on_reboot="restart" on_crash="destroy" But there is in fact the only problem I noticed (but I haven't brought it together with the dmesg output): one of the guests didn't start after reboot (reproducible). I had to start the guest manually. In xend.log I found the line [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] INFO (XendDomainInfo:1662) Domain has shutdown: name=os111-syscp id=8 reason=poweroff. Here a snippet of the xend.log: [2010-01-16 23:46:18 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:104) [xc_save]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_save 41 7 0 0 0 [2010-01-16 23:46:18 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:431) suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:18 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:107) In saveInputHandler suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:18 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:116) Domain 7 suspended. [2010-01-16 23:46:18 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table [2010-01-16 23:46:25 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Saving memory pages: iter 1 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 1: sent 131072, skipped 0, delta 6866ms, dom0 18%, target 0%, sent 625Mb/s, dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages [2010-01-16 23:46:25 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Total pages sent= 131072 (0.98x) [2010-01-16 23:46:25 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) (of which 0 were fixups) [2010-01-16 23:46:25 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) All memory is saved [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Save exit rc=0 [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2446) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=7 [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1971) Destroying device model [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:26 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vif, device = vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = console, device = console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1976) No device model [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:104) [xc_save]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_save 41 6 0 0 0 [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:431) suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:107) In saveInputHandler suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:116) Domain 6 suspended. [2010-01-16 23:46:27 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table [2010-01-16 23:46:40 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Saving memory pages: iter 1 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 1: sent 262144, skipped 0, delta 12970ms, dom0 33%, target 0%, sent 662Mb/s, dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages [2010-01-16 23:46:40 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Total pages sent= 262144 (0.99x) [2010-01-16 23:46:40 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) (of which 0 were fixups) [2010-01-16 23:46:40 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) All memory is saved [2010-01-16 23:46:42 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Save exit rc=0 [2010-01-16 23:46:42 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2446) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=6 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1971) Destroying device model [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vif, device = vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = console, device = console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1976) No device model [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:46:43 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:104) [xc_save]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_save 41 5 0 0 0 [2010-01-16 23:46:44 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table [2010-01-16 23:46:44 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:431) suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:44 3567] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:107) In saveInputHandler suspended [2010-01-16 23:46:44 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:116) Domain 5 suspended. [2010-01-16 23:46:56 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Saving memory pages: iter 1 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 1: sent 262144, skipped 0, delta 12595ms, dom0 34%, target 0%, sent 682Mb/s, dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages [2010-01-16 23:46:56 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Total pages sent= 262144 (0.99x) [2010-01-16 23:46:56 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) (of which 0 were fixups) [2010-01-16 23:46:56 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) All memory is saved [2010-01-16 23:46:58 3567] INFO (XendCheckpoint:460) Save exit rc=0 [2010-01-16 23:46:58 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2446) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=5 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1971) Destroying device model [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vif, device = vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = console, device = console/0 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51744 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51744 [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1976) No device model [2010-01-16 23:46:59 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:47:00 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:505) XendDomainInfo.shutdown(halt) [2010-01-16 23:47:00 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1476) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2010-01-16 23:47:00 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1476) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] INFO (XendDomainInfo:1662) Domain has shutdown: name=os111-syscp id=8 reason=poweroff. [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2446) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=8 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1971) Destroying device model [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1978) Releasing devices [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vif, device = vif/0 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing console/0 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = console, device = console/0 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51712 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1991) Removing vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:47:09 3567] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:921) XendDomainInfo.destroyDevice: deviceClass = vbd, device = vbd/51728 [2010-01-16 23:47:12 3567] DEBUG (SrvServer:77) SrvServer.cleanup() [2010-01-16 23:47:12 3567] DEBUG (XMLRPCServer:235) XMLRPCServer.cleanup() [2010-01-16 23:47:12 3567] DEBUG (XMLRPCServer:235) XMLRPCServer.cleanup() [2010-01-16 23:47:12 3567] DEBUG (Hald:50) Hald.shutdown() pid:3596 [2010-01-16 23:47:12 3567] DEBUG (XendDomain:618) cleanup_domains Would it be useful to attach the whole xend.log? (In reply to comment #2) thermal 24408 0 8250_pnp 19208 0 processor 48788 1 thermal rtc_cmos 12936 0 rtc_core 22132 1 rtc_cmos rtc_lib 3560 1 rtc_core thermal_sys 14336 2 thermal,processor i2c_piix4 12328 0 shpchp 32228 0 8250 82248 1 8250_pnp r8169 33196 0 pci_hotplug 31864 1 shpchp pcspkr 3064 0 serial_core 24216 1 8250 mii 6024 1 r8169 k8temp 5160 0 hwmon 3864 2 thermal_sys,k8temp i2c_core 35360 1 i2c_piix4 serio_raw 6428 0 sg 35408 0 ext3 141208 4 jbd 64280 1 ext3 mbcache 9932 2 ext2,ext3 linear 5176 0 raid456 144416 0 async_xor 5384 1 raid456 async_memcpy 3368 1 raid456 async_tx 9804 3 raid456,async_xor,async_memcpy xor 6248 2 raid456,async_xor ohci_hcd 36020 0 ehci_hcd 54228 0 usbcore 197296 3 ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd sd_mod 35384 6 crc_t10dif 2152 1 sd_mod dm_snapshot 18040 0 dm_mod 74688 26 dm_snapshot xenblk 23996 0 cdrom 36200 1 xenblk xennet 39568 0 raid1 22744 2 raid0 6824 0 atiixp 4476 0 ahci 35028 4 sata_nv 26976 0 sata_sil 10240 0 sata_via 11900 0 libata 184192 4 ahci,sata_nv,sata_sil,sata_via dock 14388 1 libata via82cxxx 7100 0 ide_core 117884 2 atiixp,via82cxxx 3w_9xxx 32932 0 3w_xxxx 25632 0 scsi_mod 179560 5 sg,sd_mod,libata,3w_9xxx,3w_xxxx (In reply to comment #4)
What was the previous kernel version (that you had no issues with)? 2.6.27.29-0.1.1
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c6 --- Comment #6 from Frank Frewer <heigu@gmx.de> 2010-01-20 21:59:05 UTC --- I was looking in elder log entries and found that the guest "os111-syscp" have got a "shutdown" also with the older kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1.1-xen. Maybe the dmesg was showing the same problems at that time but I didn't notice that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c7 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Found By|--- |Community User --- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-01-21 08:53:26 UTC --- I don't think that other problem of yours is related, so if at all I'd suggest opening a new bug. Anyway, the supposed fixed is now queued for a future maintenance update. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c8 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> 2010-02-08 13:07:09 UTC --- Updated patch was just committed, so is expected to be part of the next kernel maintenance update. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c9 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |maint:released:11.1:31244 --- Comment #9 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> 2010-03-02 16:38:37 UTC --- Update released for: kernel-debug, kernel-debug-base, kernel-debug-debuginfo, kernel-debug-debugsource, kernel-debug-extra, kernel-default, kernel-default-base, kernel-default-debuginfo, kernel-default-debugsource, kernel-default-extra, kernel-docs, kernel-kdump, kernel-kdump-debuginfo, kernel-kdump-debugsource, kernel-pae, kernel-pae-base, kernel-pae-debuginfo, kernel-pae-debugsource, kernel-pae-extra, kernel-ppc64, kernel-ppc64-base, kernel-ppc64-debuginfo, kernel-ppc64-debugsource, kernel-ppc64-extra, kernel-ps3, kernel-ps3-debuginfo, kernel-ps3-debugsource, kernel-source, kernel-source-debuginfo, kernel-syms, kernel-trace, kernel-trace-base, kernel-trace-debuginfo, kernel-trace-debugsource, kernel-trace-extra, kernel-vanilla, kernel-vanilla-debuginfo, kernel-vanilla-debugsource, kernel-xen, kernel-xen-base, kernel-xen-debuginfo, kernel-xen-debugsource, kernel-xen-extra Products: openSUSE 11.1 (debug, i586, ppc, x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c10 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:released:11.1:31244 |maint:released:11.1:31244 | |maint:released:sle11:31236 --- Comment #10 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> 2010-03-02 23:09:14 UTC --- Update released for: cluster-network-kmp-default, ext4dev-kmp-default, ext4dev-kmp-ppc64, kernel-default, kernel-default-base, kernel-default-debuginfo, kernel-default-debugsource, kernel-default-extra, kernel-kdump, kernel-kdump-debuginfo, kernel-kdump-debugsource, kernel-ppc64, kernel-ppc64-base, kernel-ppc64-debuginfo, kernel-ppc64-debugsource, kernel-ppc64-extra, kernel-source, kernel-source-debuginfo, kernel-syms Products: SLE-DEBUGINFO 11 (ppc64) SLE-HAE 11 (ppc64) SLE-SERVER 11 (ppc64) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c11 Marcus Meissner <meissner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meissner@novell.com --- Comment #11 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@novell.com> 2010-03-03 13:37:55 UTC --- We have released a kernel update for SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 that mentions/fixes this bug. The released version is 2.6.27.45-0.1.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571804#c12 --- Comment #12 from Frank Frewer <heigu@gmx.de> 2010-03-08 07:40:55 UTC --- Thank you for fixing the bug! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com