https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c1 --- Comment #1 from LTC BugProxy 2008-06-13 04:09:14 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=222000) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=222000) tar-gzip ball of the results-3.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 Jiri Dluhos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmrazik@novell.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-06-13 05:15:55 MDT --- Thank you for the logs; I am now analysing them. Many of the failures are known to us, are in process of being fixed. Here is a quick summary for the Core test: /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/strptime/T.strptime 32: - a glibc bug - please see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355887 /tset/LSB.os/procprim/execl/T.exec* 3, /tset/LSB.os/procenv/nice_X/T.nice_X 1, /tset/LSB.os/procprim/fork/T.fork 8: - bug in kernel privilege check for SCHED_FIFO - please see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394548 /tset/POSIX.os/procprim/exec/T.exec* 15, /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf/T.sysconf 1: - wrong value of ARG_MAX in libc headers - please see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389791 /tset/lsb_release/testcases/lsb_release/lsb_release-tc 2 - this failure is harmless, caused by the fact that lsb_release does not report LSB 3.2 (as we did not yet reached full LSB 3.2 compatibility) /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 24, /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 30: - these are test suite deficiencies: - please see https://www.linuxfoundation.org/lsbprs/pr/116, https://www.linuxfoundation.org/lsbprs/pr/117 /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/*: - all these failures seem to be caused by a miscompiled test suite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c5 --- Comment #5 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-06-16 05:25:16 MDT --- To the other tests in the report: At least part of the Gtk failures look to me like test suite deficiencies; results should be better when using the most recent beta of the LSB tests. Results in the Qt3 and libstc++ test are strange; I suspect that you had accidentally downloaded a miscompiled version of the test suite. Again, please inform us how the result changes with the most recent beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c6 --- Comment #6 from LTC BugProxy 2008-06-24 02:41:45 MDT --- ------- Comment From IndhuDurai@in.ibm.com 2008-06-24 04:32 EDT------- Vinay, As opensuse11.0 public release is over, is it ok to run on that or you want me to run on the prior release? regards, Indhu Durai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c8 --- Comment #8 from LTC BugProxy 2008-07-11 04:21:49 MDT --- ------- Comment From vinaysridhar@in.ibm.com 2008-07-11 06:16 EDT------- Novell, You can obtain the results file from "testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/results.tgz" using the anonymous login -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 Jiri Dluhos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |355887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c10 --- Comment #10 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-11 11:59:45 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=227370) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=227370) A simple test case. I have created a small test case which, hopefully, might reproduce the bug. Could you please test it on the same machine? I will try to test it on-site as soon as I get my paws on a free PPC machine. (It is necessary to install the locale first, then run the test.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c12 --- Comment #12 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-21 07:53:30 MDT --- If everything works as expected, it should be enough to enter the directory with the two testing locale source files (LTP_1 and UTF-8) and enter (as root): localedef -c -f UTF-8 -i LTP_1 "LTP_1.utf8" This should install the testing locale to the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c14 --- Comment #14 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-22 03:37:38 MDT --- Do not worry, the message is only a warning. The installation should succeed; the "-c" flag is there for that purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c16 --- Comment #16 from LTC BugProxy 2008-07-24 04:01:58 MDT --- ------- Comment From vinaysridhar@in.ibm.com 2008-07-24 05:52 EDT------- Novell, Did the above test result reveal anything? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c18 --- Comment #18 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-25 10:28:41 MDT --- Finally I have a working ppc machine! :-) So far, it seems that the problem does _not_ appear in openSUSE 11 if a ppc32 version is used; the /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/iswctype/T.iswctype.2 test normally passes. I will try the ppc64 version now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c20 --- Comment #20 from LTC BugProxy 2008-07-28 05:52:33 MDT --- ------- Comment From vinaysridhar@in.ibm.com 2008-07-28 07:44 EDT------- Indhu, Could you please reply to the queries in comments 37 and 39? Thanks, Vinay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c22 --- Comment #22 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-30 09:50:04 MDT --- Finally I have managed to reproduce the problem; it requires not only the symlinks but also install a specially compiled LSB package that provides the lsb-core-ppc64 atom. The results look very similar to yours, with the single problem that worries me: /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/iswctype/T.iswctype 2 CC'ing to our libc gurus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c24 Jiri Dluhos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matz@novell.com --- Comment #24 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-30 11:07:34 MDT --- Michael, Pasky, do you have any idea about the iswctype problem? It seems that a test that does iswctype() segfaults on ppc64; as far as I can tell, the test is straightforward, I don't know why it crashes. Attaching the source code of the test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c25 --- Comment #25 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-30 11:12:37 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=230860) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=230860) Source of the offending test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c26 --- Comment #26 from LTC BugProxy 2008-07-31 04:51:56 MDT --- ------- Comment From vinaysridhar@in.ibm.com 2008-07-31 06:44 EDT------- Novell, Is this a libc issue or a test-suite issue? Because running the test you posted earlier did not cause any libc issue. The iswctype problem comes only from lsb... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c28 --- Comment #28 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-31 08:52:40 MDT --- Vinay: So far, I still can't tell whether it is a libc bug or a problem of the test suite. It is true that the test program I produced did not reproduce it, but that may be because I failed to mimic the behavior of the test suite close enough. We are still working on it - please stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c30 --- Comment #30 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-07-31 11:04:36 MDT --- If I count correctly, this was the last problem, at least regarding the core test. However, we need to wait until the LSB team builds a new beta of the test suite with these fixes included, so that it can be tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c32 --- Comment #32 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-08-07 07:04:56 MDT --- Hmmm... The set of failures in libstdc++ is interesting. When I have run the test on our ppc64 machine, it passed (which is also strange - LSB tests are so strict that it is a sign of special luck when some of them passes). I will try the rest and attach the resulting report; maybe we will find the causes by comparison. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c35 Jiri Dluhos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bugproxy@us.ibm.com --- Comment #35 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-08-08 07:10:15 MDT --- Can you please re-run the desktop and libstc++ tests (plus any other you need) with the newest version of the Desktop Test Kit and new test packages? I believe the results will be much better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c37 --- Comment #37 from LTC BugProxy 2008-08-12 04:12:57 MDT --- ------- Comment From pavan.naregundi@in.ibm.com 2008-08-12 06:03 EDT------- (In reply to comment #54)

------- Comment From jdluhos@novell.com 2008-08-08 07:10:15 MDT------- Result of the libstdc++(4 failures), desktop(10 failures) and desktop-t2c(16 failures) tests on opensuse11.1 Alpha1 is attached below. Some of the failures are same as mentioned in comment #55. I have run these tests with lsb-dist-testkit-3.2.0.8.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c39 --- Comment #39 from LTC BugProxy 2008-08-12 04:13:01 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=232914) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=232914) libstdc++ test result -3.2.0.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c41 --- Comment #41 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-08-12 09:26:57 MDT --- I'm sorry but results from openSUSE 11.1 alpha1 cannot help us in this case. We need results from openSUSE 11.0 final. The new openSUSE 11.1 is too different. Therefore, results #38, #39, #40 are flawed - sorry for that. Also, the desktop test is still old; the most recent version is currently 3.2.1-2; this affects at least the GTK test (I think the Drag-and-Drop failures are all already fixed bugs in the test suite, probably even the Resource_Files.34 failure). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c43 --- Comment #43 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-08-13 05:47:26 MDT --- This is a bit strange because my results are still different; please, did you use the newest version of the desktop test? (3.2.1-2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c45 --- Comment #45 from LTC BugProxy 2008-09-02 00:14:54 MDT --- ------- Comment From vinaysridhar@in.ibm.com 2008-09-02 02:04 EDT------- Pavan, Novell, how do we proceed on this? If we could agree on a common list of test failures, we could see what could be worked on. Could you please update with your views? Thanks, Vinay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c47 --- Comment #47 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-09-03 07:02:34 MDT --- desktop-t2c tests, continued: /glib-t2c/tests/glib_string_utility/glib_string_utility 55-60 - reported as http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c49 --- Comment #49 from LTC BugProxy 2008-09-05 06:02:14 MDT --- ------- Comment From pavan.naregundi@in.ibm.com 2008-09-05 07:50 EDT------- (In reply to comment #67)

------- Comment From jdluhos@novell.com 2008-09-04 07:36:42 MDT------- desktop-t2c tests, continued:

/glib-t2c/tests/glib_messagelog/glib_messagelog 9,10 /glib-t2c/tests/glib_commandline_option_parser/glib_commandline_option_parser 24,25,46,47 - with these, I have no idea; I have not found any specific bug in the tests, and these failures do not occur at our testing machine.

Novell, I think you are not able to see my post of the result of latest run using desktop test(3.2.1-2), as I have mentioned comment 55, but it does not point to anything. Sorry for that. Here is the summary of result I got in latest run using desktop test(3.2.1-2) === desktop T2C test === * /glib-t2c/tests/glib_unicode/glib_unicode 18 * /gmodule-t2c/tests/gmodule/gmodule 23 These are only errors. === gtk test === * /tests/functions/GtkToolbar/GtkToolbar 15 (Test suite bug, http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895) * /tests/functions/GdkImages/GdkImages 2 (Test suite bug, http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893) * /tests/functions/Drag_and_Drop/Drag_and_Drop 41 (Looks like http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1260) These are known failures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c51 --- Comment #51 from LTC BugProxy 2008-09-10 05:52:17 MDT --- ------- Comment From pavan.naregundi@in.ibm.com 2008-09-10 07:47 EDT------- (In reply to comment #69)

------- Comment From jdluhos@novell.com 2008-09-05 06:13:26 MDT------- Were the other tests (desktop and libstdc++) also better? Can we consider this issue closed?

There where only known failures in libstdc++ and desktop tests. Yes, we can close this bug now. Thanks Pavan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User bugproxy@us.ibm.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c53 --- Comment #53 from LTC BugProxy 2008-09-17 11:14:27 MDT --- Rodrigo Sampaio Vaz - 2008-04-04 16:51 EDT ---Problem Description--- While running LSB 3.1 runtime-tests on a power machine I noticed 9 failures on SLES-10sp2-RC1 (2.6.16.60-0.9-ppc64 #1 SMP) using lsb-dist-testkit-3.1.1-5.ppc64.tar.gz Following are the 9 errors collected from html report generated by runtime-tests 1) /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/iswctype/T.iswctype 2 Unresolved Messages from the test If wc does not belong character class which shows desc, verify this function returns 0. Test Locale is LTP_1.UTF-8 unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received 2) /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/swscanf/T.swscanf 12 Failed Messages from the test If a conversion wide character is `p', verify this function stores the pointer value. Test Locale is LTP_1.UTF-8 Conversion wide character p is not interpreted correctly path tracing error: path counter 0, expected 1 3) /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/__wcstold_internal/T.__wcstold_internal 8 Failed Messages from the test When the correct value is outside of representable values, verify that plus or minus HUGE_VALL is returned and ERANGE is stored in errno. Test Locale is C The return value is not correct. The errno is not correct. path tracing error: path counter 0, expected 2 4) /tset/LI18NUX2K.L1/base/wcstold/T.wcstold 8 Failed Messages from the test When the correct value is outside of representable values, verify that plus or minus HUGE_VALL is returned and ERANGE is stored in errno. Test Locale is C The return value is not correct. The errno is not correct. path tracing error: path counter 0, expected 2 5) /tset/LSB.fhs/root/bin/bin-tc 11 Failed Messages from the test Reference 3.4-11 (A) The implementation provides an exec-able version of the dmesg utility in the /bin directory. Expected output to stdout, but none written 6) /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 24 Failed Messages from the test iov[0].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[0].iov_len = 1024 iov[1].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1].iov_len = 1024 iov[2].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[2].iov_len = 1024 ... iov[1021].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1021].iov_len = 1024 iov[1022].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1022].iov_len = 1024 iov[1023].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1023].iov_len = 1024 readv(5, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 14 (EFAULT) 7) /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 30 Failed Messages from the test Could not allocate a large write buffer (wanted 1024 bytes) Will attempt to test using a buffer of 8589934592 bytes This may result in a SIGSEGV being raised iov[0].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[0].iov_len = 1024 iov[1].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1].iov_len = 1024 iov[2].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[2].iov_len = 1024 .. iov[1022].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1022].iov_len = 1024 iov[1023].iov_base = 0x8f4003f4010, iov[1023].iov_len = 1024 writev(7, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected: ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 14 (EFAULT) 8) /tset/PTHR.os/procenv/getlogin_r/T.getlogin_r 1 Failed Known problem Messages from the test If the feature test macro _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS is defined: concurrent calls by multiple threads to getlogin_r(name, namesize) store the name associated by the login activity with the controlling terminal of the current process in the character array referenced by name and return 0 if successful. Posix Ref: Component GETLOGIN_R Assertion 9945-1:1996 4.2.4.2-1(C) The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM The system does not support the PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS scope, using PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 Unexpected login name root, should be vsx0 LSB Report Status: Reported to the LSB Committee as PR 0137. ---Additional Hardware Info--- keechi-lp1:~ # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 1 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 2 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 3 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 4 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 5 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 6 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) processor : 7 cpu : POWER6 (architected), altivec supported clock : 3504.000000MHz revision : 3.1 (pvr 003e 0301) timebase : 512000000 machine : CHRP IBM,9125-F2A keechi-lp1:~ # free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 8037 1596 6441 0 94 1287 -/+ buffers/cache: 213 7823 Swap: 2055 0 2055 ---uname output--- Linux keechi-lp1 2.6.16.60-0.9-ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 17 17:16:31 UTC 2008 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux Machine Type = P6/IH - p 575 ---Steps to Reproduce--- 1 - fetch the latest autotest from test.kernel.org/autotest (svn checkout svn://test.kernel.org/autotest/trunk/client /usr/local/autotest ) 2 - now cd /usr/local/autotest 3 - run bin/autotest tests/lsb_dtk/control 4 - check results in /usr/local/autotest/results/default (Takes about 6 hrs to reproduce) ---Other Component Data--- Userspace tool common name: lsb-dist-testkit-3.1.1-5.ppc64.tar.gz The userspace tool has the following bit modes: 64-bit Userspace rpm: lsb-runtime-test-3.1.1-4.ppc64.rpm --------------------------- Mirroring this bug to your for your awareness of 8 LSB 3.1 failures on SLES10 SP2. -thanks. Jiri, can you have a look at this LSB issue? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 399986 *** https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399986#c55 --- Comment #55 from Jiri Dluhos 2008-09-18 10:38:42 MDT --- As I believe these bugs are all test suite problems, closing this bug; if the failures persist with newer tests, please re-open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.