[Bug 426392] New: Please update to TeX Live 2008
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 Summary: Please update to TeX Live 2008 Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: burnus@gmx.de QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- It would be great if you could update TeX Live 2007 to TeX Live 2008. Changes: http://www.tug.org/texlive/doc/texlive-en/texlive-en.html#news Most important change (for me) are some package updates. New programs: * Xindy for sorting * luaTeX I personally would welcome a luaTeX package, possibly already set up correctly for ConTeXt, cf. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Running_Mark_IV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c2 --- Comment #2 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-09-25 04:34:04 MDT --- I'm working on but this will be post 11.1 as the changes in TL 2008 breaking my spec file. The sources do not support compiling the binaries yet, which cause always a lot of work to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User stbinner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c3 Stephan Binner <stbinner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danielstefanmader@web.de --- Comment #3 from Stephan Binner <stbinner@novell.com> 2008-10-16 06:08:50 MDT --- *** Bug 435733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435733 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c4 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh@gmx.de --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@gmx.de> 2008-10-18 18:23:19 MDT --- Xindy is not just for sorting, but proper index creation when formatted index entries are used. makeindex currently is a mess :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c5 --- Comment #5 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-20 03:39:30 MDT --- I've a 2008 TeX Live up, but for BETA only. I'll try to get this to build in the project Publishing on opensuse.org. The main problems are: first to get one source tree build on opensuse with two spec files (one for the binaries and one for all non-architecture files), the second problem is that the new tool tlmgr breaks the package managment of RPM and therefore is a no-go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c6 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-10-20 04:25:20 MDT --- Is is possible to change the location for packages from the tlmgr to the texmf-local tree? This way updated packages would not interfere with the RPM system. It looks like that would require a patched TeXlive distribution, though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c7 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-10-23 06:42:51 MDT --- Another approach: would it be possible to create something like a pseudo-package for TeXLive? This would satisfy the dependencies for packages such as kile and the like. But the more I think about it it would seem simpler *and* better to entirely remove the TeXLive dependencies from any of those packages and instead pop up some interactive note to the user that it is necessary to manually install a LaTeX distribution in order to be able to work away. This could be the older TeXlive 2007 which is included as RPM on the installation media or the officical 2008 edition with its own installer. The current setup makes it almost impossible to exchange an included (but deprecated) LaTeX distribution with a newer one for which the packagers have to headstands to include them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c8 --- Comment #8 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-23 06:55:12 MDT --- Sorry but this will not work with rpm and rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c9 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-10-23 07:22:41 MDT --- You mean the pseudo-package? But the second solution should work, or am I mistaken? It should be possible to remove the texlive dependencies from the other packages so that the user can choose? Because without that and only texlive2007 there will only be the choice between a) live with it b) uninstall it -- and with it goes kile etc. c) uninstall it -- and mess with dependecies for kile None of these choices have much appeal to me :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c10 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-28 06:49:34 MDT --- For all who wants to know what is up about TeX Live 2008 please have a look on https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=Publishing I's like to know if this works for all (e.g. does xindy do its job?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c12 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-28 14:20:58 MDT --- See also: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Publishing/ (looking at build.o.o the most important arch/cpu combinations are already available) If possible, I would like to see a texlive-bin-luatex package. (But first I'm going to test the existing packages.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c13 --- Comment #13 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-29 02:45:53 MDT --- OK I see lulatex is part of texlive-bin but it should be part of texlive-bin-latex. A own texlive-bin-lulatex is to small IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c14 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-29 05:47:51 MDT ---
I see lulatex is part of texlive-bin but it should be part of texlive-bin-latex. Yes, but only *lualatex, luatex itself should remain in texlive-bin.
A own texlive-bin-lulatex is to small IMHO. I agree.
Regarding ConTeXt: For some reason the following file exists twice: /usr/share/texmf/scripts/context/stubs/unix/luatools /usr/share/texmf/scripts/context/lua/luatools.lua where the latter seems to be slightly newer. Also currently "luatools" does not find the TEXMFCNF directory (missing symbolic link resolution). Can one set the variable export TEXMFCNF=/usr/share/texmf/web2c in /etc/profile.d/texlive.*sh as temporary work around? It should not cause any interference with other TeX users and can be overridden by the user. With that variable set, one can do: # export TEXMFCACHE=somewhere luatools --generate # --verbose luatools --ini --compile cont-en I'm not sure whether one should do something like that by default or whether one defers this to the user. Maybe one should go for the latter for the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c15 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-29 09:05:13 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=248615) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=248615) Proposed patch for luatools.lua Regarding texlive-context: a) As written before, /usr/share/texmf/scripts/context/stubs/unix/luatools should be replaced by a link to "../../lua/luatools.lua" b) Instead of setting the TEXMFCNF environment variable, can you apply the attached patch? I also sent it to Hans Hagen for incorporation into the official cont-tmf.zip ("upstream"), but this will take until TeX Live 2009 to show up here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c16 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |burnus@gmx.de --- Comment #16 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-29 09:13:29 MDT --- Q: Why the kpathesea lib isn't used? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c17 Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|burnus@gmx.de | --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-29 12:50:57 MDT --- (In reply to comment #16 from Werner Fink)
Q: Why the kpathesea lib isn't used?
Frankly, I don't know; in principle it does not matter whether KPSE or some different technique is used. (I don't know whether "luatex" itself uses KPSE or not). The problem here seems to be that "luatex" itself has the search parth for texmfcnf.lua / texmf.cnf compiled in, but luatools is not compiled - after the config file has been found, everything should work fine, including using the "ls-R" files. Regarding KPSE: One can also use something like the following: + -- First try to find the config files with KPSE + kpse.set_program_name('luatex') + local kpse_result1 = kpse.find_file(input.luaname,'cnf',true) + local kpse_result2 = kpse.find_file(input.cnfname,'cnf') + if kpse_result1 or kpse_result2 then + if kpse_result1 then + table.insert(instance.luafiles,kpse_result1) + end + if kpse_result2 then + table.insert(instance.cnffiles,kpse_result2) + end + end I try to figure out with Hans Hagen which is the (for him) acceptable way of fixing this; I'm fine with either the "/bin" hack or with the KPSE solution above or with doing posix.readlink. However, the KPSE solution seems to be the cleanest to me - especially as it will work as expected if one simply adds $HOME/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c18 Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #248615|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-29 14:09:00 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=248688) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=248688) Small .lua file update (luat-inp.lua, luatools.lua, mtxrun.lua) The attachment contains an updated version from Hans Hagen, which works. However, I'm not 100% convince that it will be the final version due to the $HOME/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf problem. Regarding the question of the advantages of over KPSE: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20081029.190655.22d26962.en.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c19 --- Comment #19 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-30 04:00:53 MDT --- IMHO all paths including the path to the configuration file and also the path to $TEXMFLOCAL, $TEXMFSYSCONFIG, $TEXMFCONFIG, $TEXMFMAIN, and $TEXMFDIST should determind by using KPSE .. otherwise the KPSE will become useless and the paths are hardcoded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c20 --- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de> 2008-10-30 04:20:18 MDT ---
IMHO all paths including the path to the configuration file and also the path to $TEXMFLOCAL, $TEXMFSYSCONFIG, $TEXMFCONFIG, $TEXMFMAIN, and $TEXMFDIST should determind by using KPSE .. otherwise the KPSE will become useless and the paths are hardcoded.
I don't see the need for the other paths as they are set in the config file; and whether one reads the cnf file using texlua or via kpse does not really matter. For finding the config file, one has to hardcode - or use some pseudo-intelligent algorithm as luatools.lua does. I see the reason for not using KPSE which is very inflexible, slower and does not support reading of files in ZIPs, from URLs etc. I'm also quite agnostic how to solve this, whether using KPSE as my patch did, hard coding of the paths (as done for the binaries/kpsewhich in "source.dif"), or using Hans' search algorithm as long it works (most of the time). (Hans rules out that he will KPSE, if you want you can join the ntg-context mailing list and discuss there.) Independent of the kind of solution, I would like to see a working "luatools" in openSUSE's TeX Live 2008. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c21 --- Comment #21 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-10-30 04:35:26 MDT --- See scripts/context/lua/luatools.lua local texmfcnf = file.join(ownroot,"texmf-local/web2c",filename) -- for minimals and myself which is wrong on openSuSE as the local stuff is at /usr/local/share/texmf/ accordingly to FHS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c22 --- Comment #22 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-03 06:29:07 MDT --- Add Jan to CC list. Maybe he wants to test out xindy :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c23 --- Comment #23 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-11-05 08:10:14 MST --- Totally broken. Nothing works with texlive2008. Start up lyx 1.6.0rc4 (available from OBS), try to export some gibberish to PDF using pdflatex - always fails. Changing to texlive2007 (also with 1.6.0rc4) works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c24 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jengelh@medozas.de --- Comment #24 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-05 08:23:36 MST --- Please be more specific? What exactly does not work? Are there some logs around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c25 --- Comment #25 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-11-05 10:16:50 MST --- Errors: LaTeX Error: File `ifxetex.sty' not found. Description: \RequirePackage{ifxetex}[2006/08/21] ^^M *** (cannot \read from terminal in nonstop modes) Just do it. Open Lyx, type abc, export pdf. See? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c26 --- Comment #26 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-05 10:37:25 MST --- Does this problem disapear if you execute texhash as root? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c27 --- Comment #27 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-11-05 10:44:51 MST --- No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c28 --- Comment #28 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-07 08:04:36 MST --- Please run locate ifxetex.sty or try to use find /usr/share/texmf -name ifxetex.sty id no locate is installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c29 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|jengelh@medozas.de | --- Comment #29 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-11-08 00:19:41 MST --- That file just does not exist anywhere. It is nowhere findable via webpin either, so something is screwed up in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c30 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jengelh@medozas.de --- Comment #30 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-10 02:57:11 MST --- This file is currently part of texlive-xetex. Shoiuld this be moved to texlive-latex? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c31 --- Comment #31 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-12-01 03:10:24 MST --- Hello, I am not sure about this, regarding comment #30. But I find this package well usable. Yet, I find this package a little fractured, and I don't think it it self-explanatory, as to which packages are needed for a full/medium/minimum/etc. installation... Most importantly, I don't see the meaning of the bin-packages vs. the regular ones?! texlive-2008-9.5 texlive-bin-cjk-2008-10.5 texlive-bin-2008-10.5 texlive-doc-2008-9.5 texlive-context-2008-9.5 texlive-latex-2008-9.5 texlive-bin-xetex-2008-10.5 texlive-bin-latex-2008-10.5 texlive-xetex-2008-9.5 It would be great to see theses packages in GM! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c32 --- Comment #32 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-12-01 03:20:32 MST --- The meaning of the bin packages are simply to reduce the amount of space on a dvd for both i586 and x86_64 as the binary are now splitted of from the ascii files. The later requires a lot of more space than the binaries. Beside this the binary packages should be installed before the main packages. You may install other binary packages with the rpm with to option -i (do not use -U) to get an NFS server providing several architectures ... for more see the package texlive-nfs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c33 --- Comment #33 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-12-01 03:50:00 MST --- Hmm, so do I need both of them, the ascii-files and the binaries? Wouldn't it make sence to have something like a pseudo-package which does this properly and hasslefree for the enduser? I mean a pseudo-package for each of the regular schemes provided with the texlive-installer: a [ ] basic scheme (plain and LaTeX) b [ ] ConTeXt scheme c [X] full scheme (everything) d [ ] GUST TeX Live scheme e [ ] GUTenberg TeX Live scheme f [ ] medium scheme g [ ] minimal scheme (plain only) h [ ] Omega scheme i [ ] teTeX scheme j [ ] XML scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c34 Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de --- Comment #34 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-03 02:59:19 MST --- Building latest texlive from repositories/Publishing on one of my 64-Bit platforms always gives me an error (2008 - 9.1): rm -f libpdf.a ar rc libpdf.a epdf.o mapfile.o utils.o vfpacket.o pkin.o writefont.o writet1. ranlib libpdf.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk/web2c/pdftexdi gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../libs/ /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common pdftexini.o pdftex0.o pdftex1.o /usr/lib/libpng12.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [pdftex] Fehler 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk/web2c' make[1]: *** [all] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk' make: *** [all] Fehler 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21506 (%build) the reason is that /usr/lib/libpng12.so is used instead of /usr/lib64/libpng12.so. If I manually patch libtool in texlive/texk directory so that the paths point to /usr/lib64, things are working, however, this is not the way it is meant to be. /etc/ld.so.conf looks ok. This is a machine that had had been upgraded from 10.3, another system with a similar configuration but fresh 11.0 install does not show this behaviour. Anything you know of I could have made wrong? If you need the full log, please let me know. I have the output rpmbuild -ba texlive.spec > log 2>&1 at hand. Take care Dieter Jurzitza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c35 --- Comment #35 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-12-03 03:33:33 MST --- Dieter: /usr/lib/libpng12.so on a 64 bit user space system makes no sence. Btw: I've absolut no problem as you can see from the repositories I've build exactly with this source tree. The question is why libtool fails on your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c36 --- Comment #36 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-12-03 04:41:19 MST --- Such error can happen if libpng-devel-32bit is installed, but libpng-devel is not. BTW, I do not even see -lpng / libpng12.so at all in the g++ command line, so what gives? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c37 --- Comment #37 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-03 06:10:58 MST --- Dear Jan, ******* whatever happens before ***** make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk/web2c/pdftexdir' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../../libs/obsdcompat \ -I../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -I./../../libs/obsdcompat \ -I./../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -I./../../libs/zlib -I./../../libs/libpng \ -I./../../libs/xpdf -Dextra_version_info=`date +-%Y%m%d%H` -O2 -g \ -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu89 \ -fPIC -Wno-write-strings -Wno-char-subscripts -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized \ -Wno-return-type -Wno-parentheses -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unprototyped-calls \ -pipe -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-strict-aliasing \ -std=gnu89 -fPIC -Wno-write-strings -Wno-char-subscripts -Wno-unused \ -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-return-type -Wno-parentheses -Wno-sign-compare \ -Wno-unprototyped-calls -pipe -c ../../libs/md5/md5.c -o ../../libs/md5/md5.o /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common \ pdftexini.o pdftex0.o pdftex1.o pdftex2.o pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o \ synctex-pdf.o pdftexdir/libpdf.a -lpng -lz ../../libs/md5/md5.o \ ./../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a lib/lib.a ../kpathsea/libkpathsea.la -lm\ -lpoppler g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common pdftexini.o pdftex0.o pdftex1.o \ pdftex2.o pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o synctex-pdf.o ./../libs/md5/md5.o \ pdftexdir/libpdf.a /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lz ./../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a \ lib/lib.a ../kpathsea/.libs/libkpathsea.a -lm -lpoppler /usr/lib/libpng12.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [pdftex] Fehler 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk/web2c' make[1]: *** [all] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/texlive/texk' make: *** [all] Fehler 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73277 (%build) ***** nothing happens after **** can see it now? I wasn't careful enough when copying things. I terminated every line by '\' now manually, additional linebreaks have been introduced by firefox now. You can see in one of the last lines: pdftexdir/libpdf.a /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lz ./../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a \ and here it dies ...... (or my compilation process, to be more precise). I have no clue why. The only thing I can do about is patch the entries sys_lib_search_path_spec and sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec during compile time to point to /lib64 /usr/lib64 rather than /lib /usr/lib but I have (not yet!) no clue why this would happen. The entries in /etc/ld.so.conf show the correct sequence. And I do have both 64 and 32 bit versions of both runtime and devel package installed. Will try to remove libpng-devel-32 bit and report back. Take care Dieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c38 --- Comment #38 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2008-12-03 06:25:47 MST --- Reformatted for Bugzilla... /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link g++ -o pdftex \ -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common \ pdftexini.o pdftex0.o pdftex1.o pdftex2.o \ pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o \ synctex-pdf.o pdftexdir/libpdf.a \ -lpng -lz ../../libs/md5/md5.o \ ../../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a \ lib/lib.a ../kpathsea/libkpathsea.la -lm \ -lpoppler g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common \ pdftexini.o pdftex0.o pdftex1.o \ pdftex2.o pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o \ synctex-pdf.o ../../libs/md5/md5.o \ pdftexdir/libpdf.a /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lz \ ../../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a \ lib/lib.a ../kpathsea/.libs/libkpathsea.a \ -lm -lpoppler /usr/lib/libpng12.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format Ah ok there it is. So that opens up new possibilities where the 32-bit lib can come in, most promimently: * libkpathsea.la is (wrongly) "linked" against /usr/lib/libpng12.so Look at that .la text file and see if this is the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c39 --- Comment #39 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-03 06:39:41 MST --- Hi Jan, you've found the reason: it is due to libpng 32-Bit devel had had been installed: No 32 - Bit libpng-devel: g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common pdftexini.o pdftex0.o \ pdftex1.o pdftex2.o pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o synctex-pdf.o \ ./../libs/md5/md5.o pdftexdir/libpdf.a -lpng -lz \ ./../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a lib/lib.a \ ./kpathsea/.libs/libkpathsea.a -lm -lpoppler With 32 - Bit libpng-devel: g++ -o pdftex -Wl,-warn-common -Wl,-warn-common pdftexini.o pdftex0.o \ pdftex1.o pdftex2.o pdftex3.o pdftexextra.o pdftex-pool.o synctex-pdf.o \ ./../libs/md5/md5.o pdftexdir/libpdf.a /usr/lib/libpng12.so -lz \ ./../libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd-compat.a lib/lib.a \ ./kpathsea/.libs/libkpathsea.a -lm -lpoppler The third line from the base differs, the erratic version contains libpng12.so. The question is now: why does that happen? There is no reason to not install the 32-Bit devel version of libpng. I guess that libtool does something wrong here: for no good reason the two paths I mentioned above point to /lib and /usr/lib rather than to /lib64 and /usr/lib64. If you change this during compiletime (early enough, just after libtool in the texk-directory has been generated) things work, too. What kind of a bug is this? Should I report to Karl Berry? To the libtool maintainer? My bug (but cannot think of having done something not permitted though it showed in fact that I did so ....) Anyway, thank you for guiding me into the right direction, I never ever had had found this on my own! Take care Dieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c40 --- Comment #40 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-06 11:31:09 MST --- Hi folks, attached please find a patch against texlive-2008 v. 9.1 that will fix the issues with building on x86_64 given that libpng-compat-devel is installed. I have been in touch with Karl Berry and Peter Breitenlohner and they are considering changes towards the usage of the system's build in libtool rather than the currently used libtool that is locally generated from configure. Until then I think the patch I attached would fix the issue without any harm I can figure out, howeve, you might have a different approach. Thanks, take care Dieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c41 --- Comment #41 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-06 11:32:20 MST --- Created an attachment (id=258445) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=258445) patch for specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c42 --- Comment #42 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-06 11:33:14 MST --- Created an attachment (id=258446) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=258446) Modify texk/configure in order to adjust the library search path as required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c43 --- Comment #43 from Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de> 2008-12-15 13:12:47 MST --- Dear TeXnicians, here's another one: prior to issueing texlive-2008 for opensuse it would be good to update to the latest caption.sty-release. The documentation distributed with the current version (from openSUSE-repository-mirror) refers to attributes that are valid only for the latest release of caption.sty. If you find the time it would be good to fix this. I stumbled over that by accident. Thank you, take care Dieter Jurzitza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User danielstefanmader@web.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c44 --- Comment #44 from Daniel Mader <danielstefanmader@web.de> 2008-12-22 04:40:44 MST --- Which repository is the recommended one for including texlive-2008 into a 11.1 system? http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Publishing/ still shows no sign of an 11.1 product. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c45 --- Comment #45 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2009-01-07 05:16:31 MST --- The build is on the way, compare with bug #461150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c46 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|jengelh@medozas.de | --- Comment #46 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2009-01-07 17:01:22 MST --- It still does not work as texlive2007 used to. $ pdflatex something_produced_by_lex.tex This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.1415926-1.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.7) %&-line parsing enabled. entering extended mode (./nf1.tex LaTeX2e <2005/12/01> Babel <v3.8l> and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumylang, noh yphenation, german-x-2008-06-18, ngerman-x-2008-06-18, ancientgreek, ibycus, ar abic, basque, bulgarian, catalan, pinyin, coptic, croatian, czech, danish, dutc h, esperanto, estonian, farsi, finnish, french, galician, german, ngerman, mono greek, greek, hungarian, icelandic, indonesian, interlingua, irish, italian, la tin, mongolian, mongolian2a, bokmal, nynorsk, polish, portuguese, romanian, rus sian, sanskrit, serbian, slovak, slovenian, spanish, swedish, turkish, ukenglis h, ukrainian, uppersorbian, welsh, loaded. (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/size12.clo)) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/lm/lmodern.sty) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/utf8.def (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/t1enc.dfu) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ot1enc.dfu) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omsenc.dfu))) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty)) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/english.ldf (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.def))) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifpdf.sty) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifvtex.sty) ! LaTeX Error: File `ifxetex.sty' not found. Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file name: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c47 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jengelh@medozas.de --- Comment #47 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2009-01-08 03:35:48 MST --- Could you run the commands locate ifxetex.sty && rpm -qf `locate ifxetex.sty` kpsewhich ifxetex.sty this should report /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/ifxetex/ifxetex.sty texlive-xetex-2008-10.1 /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/ifxetex/ifxetex.sty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c48 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|jengelh@medozas.de | --- Comment #48 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2009-01-13 02:34:08 MST --- Not again. Installing texlive is a real timechore because of the many files inside the package. 10:27 yaguchi:~ > find /usr/share/texmf/ | grep ifxete 10:31 yaguchi:~ > rpm -qal 'texliv*' | grep ifxet 10:31 yaguchi:~ > Not in the rpm? That should have shown up on your side too. Next time run lyx and the "pdflatex (PDF)" export. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c49 --- Comment #49 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2009-01-13 02:37:08 MST --- FWIW, /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/ifxetex/ifxetex.sty is now in the texlive-xetex package, which was not the case for the texlive 2007 rpms apparently. So you already ran into bug #437141 comment #2 _already_. (Which means #437141 should be given attention nevertheless and just setting the dependencies so that lyx requires all packages so that pdflatex export will work.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User jengelh@medozas.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c50 --- Comment #50 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> 2009-01-13 02:43:25 MST --- And since three make a good couple, the packages that are installed: texlive-bin@i586, texlive-bin-latex@i586, texlive@noarch, texlive-latex@noarch. Oddly enough, even though ifxetex.sty is not part of these packages even in the 2007 rpm version, the lyx export does not choke on it. Which probably means that some file within those four 2008 packages now references ifxetex when it did not in the four of 2007. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c51 --- Comment #51 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2009-01-13 07:34:45 MST --- I've moved ifxetex.sty from texlive-xetex to texlive (as it is a generic file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392 User felix@derklecks.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426392#c52 Felix Möller <felix@derklecks.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix@derklecks.de --- Comment #52 from Felix Möller <felix@derklecks.de> 2009-02-21 05:03:24 MST --- what about pushing these packages to factory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com