[Bug 1079863] New: Mesa related packages in Tumblewee-Update are lethal!
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 Bug ID: 1079863 Summary: Mesa related packages in Tumblewee-Update are lethal! Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org Assignee: xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: nt1277@gmail.com QA Contact: xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Mesa related packages from http://download.opensuse.org/update/tumbleweed/ with the version number 18.0.0-187.1 made my notebook unusable! As soon as X.org started, the displays changed to empty and white. Please remove these packages ASAP! I could hardly revert to 18.0.0-185.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Mesa related packages in |Mesa related packages in |Tumblewee-Update are |Tumbleweed-Update are |lethal! |lethal! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c1 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> --- I guess that's another duplicate of boo#1079465. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c2 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nt1277@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(nt1277@gmail.com) --- Comment #2 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> --- Please check https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079465#c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c3 Michal Srb <msrb@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msrb@suse.com --- Comment #3 from Michal Srb <msrb@suse.com> --- With 18.0.0-187.1 it should be already fixed, but you most likely have damaged shader in cache saved by 18.0.0-185.1. Delete ~/.cache and /var/lib/sddm/.cache directories. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c4 --- Comment #4 from Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #1)
I guess that's another duplicate of boo#1079465.
Probably not. The mentioned Mesa versions appeared just today in Tumbleweed-update. Anyway, Tumbleweed-update shouldn't contain "real" packages, only some test and meta packages, AFAIK! Putting these real packages into this repository was probably a mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c5 Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nt1277@gmail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #1)
I guess that's another duplicate of boo#1079465.
I mean putting these real packages into this repository was probably an accident. BTW, see #c4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c6 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nt1277@gmail.com) --- Comment #6 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> --- Not sure what you would like to tell me. I can only ask you to give the latest Mesa packages with the fix a try and remove the cache manually as suggested in comment #3. Michal and me are pretty sure it's just a duplicate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c7 --- Comment #7 from Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> --- OK, I'll try. One moment please... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c8 Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nt1277@gmail.com) | --- Comment #8 from Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #6)
Not sure what you would like to tell me. I can only ask you to give the latest Mesa packages with the fix a try and remove the cache manually as suggested in comment #3. Michal and me are pretty sure it's just a duplicate.
OK, deleting the cache files solved the problem. However, I think the new packages probably should include some post/pre-install scripts to delete the packages, because this way they will render so much computers practically unusable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c11 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> --- Closing as dup. (In reply to Tamás Németh from comment #8)
OK, deleting the cache files solved the problem. However, I think the new packages probably should include some post/pre-install scripts to delete the packages, because this way they will render so much computers practically unusable.
I guess you're talking about removing *cache* files. I expect more harm than benefit when trying this. Seriously. And you cannot remove files in $HOME of a network drive anyway. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1079465 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079863#c12 --- Comment #12 from Tamás Németh <nt1277@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #11)
Closing as dup.
(In reply to Tamás Németh from comment #8)
OK, deleting the cache files solved the problem. However, I think the new packages probably should include some post/pre-install scripts to delete the packages, because this way they will render so much computers practically unusable.
I guess you're talking about removing *cache* files. I expect more harm than benefit when trying this. Seriously. And you cannot remove files in $HOME of a network drive anyway.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1079465 ***
I think, you're right. Thank you for your effort. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com