[Bug 963979] New: libdrm requires valgrind for building
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979 Bug ID: 963979 Summary: libdrm requires valgrind for building Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: 2015* Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org Assignee: xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: rguenther@suse.com QA Contact: xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- For no good reason (debugging it?) libdrm requires valgrind for building. Its build-log suggests it can cope without: [ 169s] checking for VALGRIND... yes [ 169s] checking whether to enable Valgrind support... yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
Richard Biener
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c1
Egbert Eich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c3
Stefan Dirsch
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c6
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
Well, is there an issue with requiring valgrind for the build? I don't remember exactly why I added it 4 years ago, but being able to use valgrind without false positive is always nice...
Extra dependencies are always a hassle to deal with (if they fail to build). Well, if you, like me, try to bootstrap things with a new compiler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c7
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Dirsch
Well, is there an issue with requiring valgrind for the build? I don't remember exactly why I added it 4 years ago, but being able to use valgrind without false positive is always nice...
So, in short. If you happen to need to use valgrind on libdrm you want it to be built with valgrind support (at least on Intel as we just learned from Michal). I believe this was also the reason why you did enable it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c8
--- Comment #8 from Egbert Eich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
Egbert Eich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c9
Richard Biener
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c10
Egbert Eich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c11
--- Comment #11 from Bernhard Wiedemann
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963979#c12
--- Comment #12 from Egbert Eich
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com