http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980#c1 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Andree 2010-05-19 00:11:28 UTC --- Note that the tested machine (openSUSE) is not the same as the reporting (Ubuntu). Just my convenience of running Firefox on the stronger machine. Meaning: please disregard the User-Agent. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980#c2 Petr Baudis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Petr Baudis 2010-06-01 01:42:16 UTC --- Hmm, curious that you see this on Ubuntu too, since Debian Lenny does not seem to be suffering AFAICS. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980#c zj jia changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zjjia@novell.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |matz@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980#c6 Matthias Andree changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #6 from Matthias Andree 2011-07-07 13:58:28 UTC --- <irony>Alright. Ulrich is God and his silence is sufficient to defend his unsubstantiated "should" clauses.</irony> Ulrich isn't deciding what's a bug or not. His "should" clauses are not backed by system documentation are just personal opinions, but irrelevant. The point is that we get an UNLISTED and UNWARRANTED IPv4 address in return. While the IPv4 duplicate 127.0.0.1 is not typically a practical problem, the whole discussion sidesteps the actual resolver bug, and that is that IPv6 /etc/hosts entries yield IPv4 results that should not be there -- whether that is a malfunction of the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag or whatnot, I don't care. Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606980#c8 Michael Matz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Michael Matz 2011-07-07 14:35:23 UTC --- So, what exactly are you complaining about? It seems not to be the duplicate returns of 127.0.0.1 . Is that correct? You seem to complain about getaddrinfo returning an unlisted ipv4 address from /etc/hosts. But you haven't shown this. 127.0.0.1 _is_ listed in your /etc/hosts; it's returned twice, okay, but that's no issue to you it seems. So, please file a bug report about what actually worries you, not what you think are symptoms of a suspected problem. Note that the double-return of 127.0.0.1 will remain WONTFIX, meaning I agree it's a deficiency but I decided to not do anything about it. Take it upstream yourself if you disagree. Now, if you can report a different bug, the one that actually worries you, matters may be different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.