http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c1 --- Comment #1 from Aaron Puchert <aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net> --- Alternatively libqt5-qttools-doc could be built with llvm11 directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c2 Christophe Giboudeaux <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1184920 | --- Comment #2 from Christophe Giboudeaux <christophe@krop.fr> --- libqt5-qttools-doc requires the version that was present at build time. So the obvious question is: was it rebuilt? As you removed the split libraries in recent llvm versions, I don't think it can build successfully in Leap 15.3 unless it gets patched to link to clang-cpp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

libqt5-qttools-doc requires the version that was present at build time.

So the obvious question is: was it rebuilt? Problem is that libqt5-qttools-doc is in SLE, and I couldn't convince SUSE to update the metapackage there. So if you're using the metapackage in SLE you're going to get llvm7 despite llvm9 and llvm11 being available in SLE. Only Leap

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c3 --- Comment #3 from Aaron Puchert <aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net> --- (In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #2) packages default to llvm11.

As you removed the split libraries in recent llvm versions, I don't think it can build successfully in Leap 15.3 unless it gets patched to link to clang-cpp. That might be another problem.

There is a bunch of unfortunate dependencies/conflicts here, and getting rid of any one of them would solve the issue. Moving the builtin headers from clang7 to libclang7 should be safe and would allow you to drop the clang7 dependency. I could try to patch the CMake files shipped by LLVM to not be so picky, but I'm not sure if that works. And lastly I'm not sure whether either of the unresolvable packages really need libqt5-qttools-doc to build. I don't have it installed but kdevelop builds fine locally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c5 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Giboudeaux <christophe@krop.fr> --- (In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #4)

(In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #3)

...

I don't have it installed but kdevelop builds fine locally. Ah, I guess it might be missing some features then:

-- Could NOT find Qt5Help (missing: Qt5Help_DIR)

But I'm not sure whether we need (lib)clang to build the QtHelp plugin.

It's a build and runtime requirement and it must have the version it was built with. See https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109367 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c7 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Giboudeaux <christophe@krop.fr> --- (In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #6)

(In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #3)

It wouldn't help for Qt5 packages. They use qmake. The issue here is that you removed the split libraries to save space and only have libclang-cpp.so.

This part can be patched but first I need to be sure libqt5-qttools (and libqt5-qtdoc as well) will be rebuilt.

as in: having the changes in Leap:15.3:Update is not acceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c9 --- Comment #9 from Aaron Puchert <aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net> --- (In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #5)

It's a build and runtime requirement and it must have the version it was built with. See https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109367 But it only needs libclang plus the builtin headers and not the clang binaries, right?

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c11 --- Comment #11 from Christophe Giboudeaux <christophe@krop.fr> --- To summarize: yes we can fix the Qt packages, we even already have the fixes but it requires llvm11 being in the standard repository and the Qt packages to be rebuilt there as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185203#c13 --- Comment #13 from Aaron Puchert <aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net> --- (In reply to Aaron Puchert from comment #12)

So then we could also relax the requirement to libclang7, i.e. without an update to llvm11, once Antonio has moved the headers there. (See bug 118492, comment 14.) I should use copy/paste, it's bug 1184920, comment 14.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.