[Bug 1173422] New: systemd can't be rebuild with current linux-glibc-devel
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 Bug ID: 1173422 Summary: systemd can't be rebuild with current linux-glibc-devel Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs@suse.de Reporter: lubos.kocman@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Marcus has raised this as a potential SHIP_STOPPER for openSUSE Leap 15.2 Recent submission of linux-glibc-devel from SLE caused systemd not to rebuild on all arches. SR: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/738565 The rebuild error was not spotted in openSUSE:Leap:15.2 project, however Marcus is hitting it now with maintenance update. We've agreed that the issue can be handled as a maintenance update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P1 - Urgent Flags| |SHIP_STOPPER? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c1 --- Comment #1 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> --- les -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -g -c src/shared/seccomp-util.c -fPIC -DPIC -o src/shared/.libs/libsystemd_shared_la-seccomp-util.o [ 229s] In file included from ./src/basic/string-util.h:27:0, [ 229s] from ./src/basic/af-list.h:22, [ 229s] from src/shared/seccomp-util.c:30: [ 229s] ./src/basic/macro.h:279:22: error: size of array 'x' is negative [ 229s] char x[(expr) ? 0 : -1]; \ [ 229s] ^ [ 229s] src/shared/seccomp-util.c:1195:1: note: in expansion of macro 'assert_cc' [ 229s] assert_cc(SCMP_SYS(shmget) < 0); [ 229s] ^~~~~~~~~ [ 229s] ./src/basic/macro.h:279:22: error: size of array 'x' is negative [ 229s] char x[(expr) ? 0 : -1]; \ [ 229s] ^ [ 229s] src/shared/seccomp-util.c:1196:1: note: in expansion of macro 'assert_cc' [ 229s] assert_cc(SCMP_SYS(shmat) < 0); [ 229s] ^~~~~~~~~ [ 229s] ./src/basic/macro.h:279:22: error: size of array 'x' is negative [ 229s] char x[(expr) ? 0 : -1]; \ [ 229s] ^ [ 229s] src/shared/seccomp-util.c:1197:1: note: in expansion of macro 'assert_cc' [ 229s] assert_cc(SCMP_SYS(shmdt) < 0); [ 229s] ^~~~~~~~~ [ 229s] make[2]: *** [Makefile:19371: src/shared/libsystemd_shared_la-seccomp-util.lo] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c2 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> --- This happens for i586 and ppc64le only. other architectures are OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs@suse.de |schwab@suse.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c3 Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(schwab@suse.de) --- Comment #3 from Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> --- Is there any chance that we could have this fixed with GA (Next Thursday)? As a 0day maintenance update? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c4 --- Comment #4 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> --- The linux-glibc-devel jump from 4.12 to 5.3 causes this change in configure: - checking whether IFLA_INET6_ADDR_GEN_MODE is declared... no - checking whether IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_STABLE_PRIVACY is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_VRF_TABLE is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_MACVLAN_FLAGS is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_IPVLAN_MODE is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_VTI_REMOTE is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_BOND_AD_INFO is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_VXLAN_GPE is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_GENEVE_LABEL is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_IPTUN_ENCAP_DPORT is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_GRE_ENCAP_DPORT is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING_SYNC is declared... no - checking whether IFLA_BR_VLAN_DEFAULT_PVID is declared... no - checking whether NDA_IFINDEX is declared... no - checking whether IFA_FLAGS is declared... no + checking whether IFLA_INET6_ADDR_GEN_MODE is declared... yes + checking whether IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_STABLE_PRIVACY is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_VRF_TABLE is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_MACVLAN_FLAGS is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_IPVLAN_MODE is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_VTI_REMOTE is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_BOND_AD_INFO is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_VXLAN_GPE is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_GENEVE_LABEL is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_IPTUN_ENCAP_DPORT is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_GRE_ENCAP_DPORT is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING_SYNC is declared... yes + checking whether IFLA_BR_VLAN_DEFAULT_PVID is declared... yes + checking whether NDA_IFINDEX is declared... yes + checking whether IFA_FLAGS is declared... yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c5 Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|schwab@suse.de |systemd-maintainers@suse.de --- Comment #5 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> --- I think it is a systemd problem actually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 Max Lin <mlin@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlin@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 Sergio Lindo Mansilla <slindomansilla@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slindomansilla@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173422#c7 Vinzenz Vietzke <vinz@vinzv.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vinz@vinzv.de --- Comment #7 from Vinzenz Vietzke <vinz@vinzv.de> --- To give some input: Running a 15.1 > 15.2 dup went just fine on various x86_64 machines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com