https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c2 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-07 21:58:43 UTC --- If it works with vanilla openSUSE maintainers cannot be guilty when it does not work with a flavor patched by them, can they? Seems like Bug 627147 -> cdrom drive is guilty if it works well when using an older kernel ;-) dmesg | grep -e "drm" -e "Linux version" [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.1.9-1.4-vanilla (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 4.6.2 (SUSE Linux) ) #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 08:55:10 UTC 2012 (efb5ff4) [ 2.944169] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20120229 81ffbbe [ 3.147156] [drm] radeon defaulting to kernel modesetting. [ 3.147162] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled. [ 3.147270] fb: conflicting fb hw usage radeondrmfb vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver [ 3.188372] [drm] initializing kernel modesetting (RV250 0x1002:0x4C66 0x1584:0x2302). [ 3.188417] [drm] register mmio base: 0xDFEF0000 [ 3.188420] [drm] register mmio size: 65536 [ 3.189752] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). [ 3.189755] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [ 3.189772] [drm] radeon: irq initialized. [ 3.193698] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M [ 3.193705] [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR [ 3.197057] [drm] radeon: 64M of VRAM memory ready [ 3.197062] [drm] radeon: 64M of GTT memory ready. [ 3.197102] [drm] radeon: ib pool ready. [ 3.198434] [drm] fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr 0xe0000000 and cpu addr 0xf801c000 [ 3.198560] [drm] Loading R200 Microcode [ 3.234791] [drm] radeon: ring at 0x00000000E0001000 [ 3.234814] [drm] ring test succeeded in 0 usecs [ 3.235201] [drm] ib test succeeded in 0 usecs [ 3.235523] [drm] Panel ID String: 1024x768 [ 3.235527] [drm] Panel Size 1024x768 [ 3.238597] [drm] radeon legacy LVDS backlight initialized [ 3.238650] [drm] Radeon Display Connectors [ 3.238653] [drm] Connector 0: [ 3.238656] [drm] VGA [ 3.238659] [drm] DDC: 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 0x60 [ 3.238662] [drm] Encoders: [ 3.238664] [drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1 [ 3.238666] [drm] Connector 1: [ 3.238668] [drm] LVDS [ 3.238670] [drm] Encoders: [ 3.238672] [drm] LCD1: INTERNAL_LVDS [ 3.238674] [drm] Connector 2: [ 3.238676] [drm] S-video [ 3.238678] [drm] Encoders: [ 3.238680] [drm] TV1: INTERNAL_DAC2 [ 3.238712] [drm] radeon: power management initialized [ 3.267884] [drm] fb mappable at 0xD0040000 [ 3.267890] [drm] vram apper at 0xD0000000 [ 3.267893] [drm] size 3145728 [ 3.267895] [drm] fb depth is 24 [ 3.267897] [drm] pitch is 4096 [ 3.268312] fbcon: radeondrmfb (fb0) is primary device [ 3.292253] fb0: radeondrmfb frame buffer device [ 3.292257] drm: registered panic notifier [ 3.292268] [drm] Initialized radeon 2.14.0 20120229 81ffbbe for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c4 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|johannesobermayr@gmx.de | --- Comment #4 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-08 04:37:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3)

Does using the same version you used in comment #2 work on the openSUSE kernel? There's a pretty big diffstat between the two versions:

Nope. I am doing almost daily / weekly testing and this has happened for ~ 5 to 6 months if I remember right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c6 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|johannesobermayr@gmx.de | --- Comment #6 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-15 18:55:33 UTC --- Please provide a kernel package (prefered: desktop) in OBS which I can build against because my tries to remove the patch make kernel build fail after ~ 1 1/2 hours :-( It can also be based on Kernel:HEAD ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c8 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|johannesobermayr@gmx.de | --- Comment #8 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-16 21:38:02 UTC --- Kernel and drm modules built against above repository also crash. Note: I had to use kernel-debug this time because default, desktop, and pae do not build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c10 --- Comment #10 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-17 21:19:05 UTC --- Still valid with kernel-desktop. Btw. please stop wasting build power and build just the flavor we need (kernel-desktop on i586). Maybe you can also link home:jobermayr/drm-radeon and comment out BuildRequires for other flavors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c12 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|johannesobermayr@gmx.de | --- Comment #12 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-03-26 15:37:14 UTC --- Still valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749654#c14 Johannes Obermayr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|johannesobermayr@gmx.de | --- Comment #14 from Johannes Obermayr 2012-08-10 12:17:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13)

Just for fun, can you try with kernel-vanilla?

(In reply to comment #2)

If it works with vanilla openSUSE maintainers cannot be guilty when it does not work with a flavor patched by them, can they?

To make it clear: Yes, I tested it ~ 5 months ago and a openSuSE patch is the offender ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.