https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211554 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211554#c13 --- Comment #13 from Bruno Friedmann <bruno@ioda-net.ch> --- I mean most of the work was there to have this package. I've quickly build and tested 1.2.1 and I agree there's a performance issue at least with traditional clamscan, but there's also more virus known, and if I add the functionality that tier can offer I would be more interested by protecting myself from threads than counting performance. clamscan -r --infected Documents/ ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 8677705 Engine version: 1.2.1 Scanned directories: 113 Scanned files: 1380 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 5498.37 MB Data read: 3326.20 MB (ratio 1.65:1) Time: 1056.323 sec (17 m 36 s) Start Date: 2023:11:06 17:01:45 End Date: 2023:11:06 17:19:21 clamscan -r --infected Documents/ ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 8677603 Engine version: 0.103.11 Scanned directories: 113 Scanned files: 1380 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 3728.95 MB Data read: 3326.20 MB (ratio 1.12:1) Time: 505.956 sec (8 m 25 s) Start Date: 2023:11:06 16:43:00 End Date: 2023:11:06 16:51:26 What is really strange is the amount of Data Scaned (almost twice in 1.2.1) But of course this is my humble needs on restricted number of platform (TW 64bits). Hope this can be sorted out soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.