[Bug 471440] New: make parted create correct device node name for bios raid
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 Summary: make parted create correct device node name for bios raid Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: puzel@novell.com ReportedBy: aschnell@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: Development On BIOS RAID disks parted creates device nodes with the partition ending pN instead of -partN (in /dev/mapper). The patch we made for multipath should be extended to cover also BIOS RAID. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User puzel@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c1
Petr Uzel
On BIOS RAID disks parted creates device nodes with the partition ending pN instead of -partN (in /dev/mapper).
The patch we made for multipath should be extended to cover also BIOS RAID.
Does this apply also for SLE11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User aschnell@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c2
Arvin Schnell
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
Petr Uzel
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User puzel@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c3
Petr Uzel
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User hare@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c4
Hannes Reinecke
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User puzel@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c5
Petr Uzel
According to IRC discussion with Arvin, not only multipath and dmraid partitions, but partitions on _all_ DM-based devices should be named *_partX
What about dmraid 4/5? AFAIK it does not use device-mapper, and so it would be needed to treat these kind of devices separately in parted. Am I right with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User hare@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c6
--- Comment #6 from Hannes Reinecke
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
Arvin Schnell
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User puzel@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c7
Petr Uzel
No. dmraid 4/5 uses device-mapper. You're confusing it with MD-raid.
No, I'm not, but until now I thought that DM supports only stripping and mirroring and had no clue about dm-raid45 kernel module (not in vanilla kernel). Thanks for correction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440
User puzel@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c8
Petr Uzel
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com