[Bug 471440] New: make parted create correct device node name for bios raid
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 Summary: make parted create correct device node name for bios raid Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: puzel@novell.com ReportedBy: aschnell@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: Development On BIOS RAID disks parted creates device nodes with the partition ending pN instead of -partN (in /dev/mapper). The patch we made for multipath should be extended to cover also BIOS RAID. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User puzel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c1 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |aschnell@novell.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-02-09 00:41:51 MST --- (In reply to comment #0)
On BIOS RAID disks parted creates device nodes with the partition ending pN instead of -partN (in /dev/mapper).
The patch we made for multipath should be extended to cover also BIOS RAID.
Does this apply also for SLE11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User aschnell@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c2 Arvin Schnell <aschnell@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|aschnell@novell.com | --- Comment #2 from Arvin Schnell <aschnell@novell.com> 2009-02-09 02:59:50 MST --- Yes. But since YaST calls kpartx after parted this should not cause trouble. But longterm I would like to remove the kpartx call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User puzel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c3 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hare@novell.com --- Comment #3 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-03-09 09:10:33 MST --- According to IRC discussion with Arvin, not only multipath and dmraid partitions, but partitions on _all_ DM-based devices should be named *_partX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User hare@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c4 Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kasievers@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com> 2009-03-10 03:43:59 MST --- I think calling kpartx is wrong. We should rather trigger a uevent (eg by echo 'change' > /sys/block/dm-X/uevent which would cause kpartx to be called correctly via udev. We then just have to add a wait loop to wait for the device node to appear. We should also aim for a tighter udev integration here; Kay is working on a scheme for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User puzel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c5 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |aschnell@novell.com --- Comment #5 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-03-10 05:01:16 MST --- (In reply to comment #3)
According to IRC discussion with Arvin, not only multipath and dmraid partitions, but partitions on _all_ DM-based devices should be named *_partX
What about dmraid 4/5? AFAIK it does not use device-mapper, and so it would be needed to treat these kind of devices separately in parted. Am I right with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User hare@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c6 --- Comment #6 from Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com> 2009-03-10 05:18:31 MST --- No. dmraid 4/5 uses device-mapper. You're confusing it with MD-raid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 Arvin Schnell <aschnell@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|aschnell@novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User puzel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c7 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-03-10 06:03:57 MST --- (In reply to comment #6)
No. dmraid 4/5 uses device-mapper. You're confusing it with MD-raid.
No, I'm not, but until now I thought that DM supports only stripping and mirroring and had no clue about dm-raid45 kernel module (not in vanilla kernel). Thanks for correction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440 User puzel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471440#c8 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-03-11 02:36:03 MST --- Fix submitted to Factory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com