https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c1 --- Comment #1 from Felix Möller 2007-07-20 10:13:21 MST --- Created an attachment (id=152214) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=152214) this is the output of nm-tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556 Stephan Binner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team- |hschaa@novell.com |screening@forge.provo.novell| |.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c4 Helmut Schaa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hschaa@novell.com AssignedTo|hschaa@novell.com |tambet@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Helmut Schaa 2007-07-23 00:41:12 MST --- NetworkManager -> reassigning to Tambet. Tambet, I recently read a mail on the NetworkManager list mentioning the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c6 --- Comment #6 from Helmut Schaa 2007-07-30 04:28:00 MST --- Here you are... http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2007-July/msg00124.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2007-July/msg00165.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c8 Felix Möller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rml@novell.com --- Comment #8 from Felix Möller 2007-08-09 12:36:50 MST --- I invested some more time today: disabling patch0 (nm-wireless-driver-workarounds-rml.patch) in the spec-file solves the problem. I rebuilt the NetworkManager RPMs without that patch and it works now. I have not noticed any other problems yet. As the patch seems to be written by Robert Love I am adding him to CC:. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c10 --- Comment #10 from Felix Möller 2007-08-28 03:46:14 MST --- Could anybody comment on this one? With the current madwifi 0.9.3.2 the quality is allways 100% without nm-wireless-driver-workarounds-rml.patch it seems to be more correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c12 --- Comment #12 from JP Rosevear 2007-09-28 13:40:30 MST --- So, there is a specific hack because madwifi used to report bogus percentages. Disabling the whole patch is probably wrong because it contains work arounds for things like cisco scanning as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c14 --- Comment #14 from Felix Möller 2007-10-07 16:00:50 MST --- (In reply to comment #13 from JP Rosevear)

I have test packages for bug 310509 and for bug 293556 in my build service repo at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jproseve/openSUSE_Factory/

Tambet, If you ok the changes I can submit the packages. The patches added are nm-310509.patch and nm-293556.patch I tested your package and now i can see different qualities, but there is something wrong with them. :-( At least ipw3945 and iwl3945 show different qualities which make more sense.

The following networks should have a lower quality (they are not seen by the intel-card at all :-( ) HummiMS: Infrastructure Mode, Freq 2.457 MHz, Rate 62 Mb/s, Strength 100%, Encrypted (WPA WPA2) Cell 05 - Address: xx ESSID:"HummiMS" Mode:Master Frequency:2.457 GHz (Channel 10) Quality=172/70 Signal level=-179 dBm Noise level=-95 dBm Encryption key:on Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s Extra:bcn_int=100 IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (2) : CCMP TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK IE: WPA Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (2) : CCMP TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK Maho: Infrastructure Mode, Freq 2.457 MHz, Rate 54 Mb/s, Strength 81%, Encrypted (WEP) Cell 11 - Address: xx ESSID:"Maho" Mode:Master Frequency:2.457 GHz (Channel 10) Quality=57/70 Signal level=-38 dBm Noise level=-95 dBm Encryption key:on Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s Extra:bcn_int=100 And the following should have better quality: (ipw: 88%) FNet: Infrastructure Mode, Freq 2.462 MHz, Rate 62 Mb/s, Strength 68%, Encrypted (WPA WPA2) Cell 03 - Address: 00:18:F8:FA:2C:2C ESSID:"FNet" Mode:Master Frequency:2.462 GHz (Channel 11) Quality=49/70 Signal level=-46 dBm Noise level=-95 dBm Encryption key:on Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s Extra:bcn_int=100 IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (2) : CCMP TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK IE: WPA Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (2) : CCMP TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c16 --- Comment #16 from Felix Möller 2007-10-12 04:06:05 MST --- (In reply to comment #15 from Tambet Ingo)

Felix, the output you pasted is from 'iwlist scan' command, right? That's what the driver reports so it has nothing to do with NM. Yes thats right. I thought you might see the problem with them, as the displayed bandwith seems to be way better than before but still a little of. :-(

So do you want me to report an upstream madwifi bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c18 --- Comment #18 from Anja Stock 2007-10-18 05:26:43 MST --- released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293556#c20 --- Comment #20 from Tambet Ingo 2007-11-13 05:42:41 MST --- Yes, I know, it's because I never applied the patch to factory. The reason is that we're moving to NetworkManager 0.7 where that patch is not needed. The new version should show up sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.