https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334988 Martin Mrazik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmrazik@novell.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com |hschaa@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334988#c2 Tambet Ingo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tambet@novell.com Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|tambet@novell.com | --- Comment #2 from Tambet Ingo 2007-11-19 02:56:00 MST --- No. See http://clarkbw.net/blog/2007/10/16/refresh-in-reactive-displays/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334988#c4 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2007-11-19 03:48:22 MST --- Thanks Helmut. Pity -- the link given by Tambet reminds me of wish report for Konqueror -- crash recovery feature. The first response was humorous WONTFIX because... it is better to fix all bugs and then Konqueror will stop crashing. Pretty much the same idea is presented in this article -- refresh on demand is not required, it is better to fix all bugs and then auto-refresh will be enough :-) But the world is not perfect so KNM/NM still tries to connect to turned off networks :-) Btw. it is a bit strange though that such things as auto-refresh, refresh on demand, and so on are not put in client (KNM) instead of daemon -- I mean in design terms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.