http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646#c2 Stephan Kulow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coolo@suse.com, | |idonmez@suse.com --- Comment #2 from Stephan Kulow --- Then 1.11.8 should be in backports, no? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646#c4 --- Comment #4 from Marguerite Su --- I don't know how this backport repository works, but the nginx in it was 1.8.1, the same version as Leap 42.1/42.2. nginx in factory has been 1.11.x for some time, so it looks like someone intended not to backport 1.11.x. BTW that's not the point I think..."any bugfix for backports has to land in factory first", just too strict. what if the fix works on older SLE infrastructure but breaks in Factory? different gcc versions can easily achieve that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646#c7 Ludwig Nussel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jberry@suse.com, | |lnussel@suse.com Assignee|lnussel@suse.com |sbahling@suse.com --- Comment #7 from Ludwig Nussel --- The requested changes for the factory source checker to check multiple upstream projects would not have helped in this case for two reasons 1. the sources submitted to backports were not in 42.2 already but rather contained in parallel in the request itself. The bot cannot handle that. 2. the 42.2 and backports sources in the request are actually different due to whitespace changes and different time stamps. So even if the bot would implement 1) it would have declined. I'll reassign to scott to (find someone to) implement 1). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021646#c9 --- Comment #9 from Scott Bahling --- (In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #8)

That's weird: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/452949

A submission FROM openSUSE:Factory to backports makes factory-source add a review to backports-reviewers

...

the package needs to be accepted in Factory first

We have noticed that. It's strange because if I dry-run the bot locally, the source matches and the bot accepts. Perhaps something weird still going on with the fallback mode. I will take a closer look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.