[Bug 390471] New: Yast2 package manager exits when trying to install a package
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471 Summary: Yast2 package manager exits when trying to install a package Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Factory Platform: i686 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: timlee@novell.com QAContact: jsrain@novell.com Found By: Integration Test Created an attachment (id=215310) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=215310) yast2 log files - Clean install of build 111/beta3 of opensuse 11 in a vmware vm, with default gnome package set. - after first boot of OS ran command: `yast2 sw_single` - In the Package Selection window entered 'zoo' in the filters field. - In the list of packages clicked on the zoo package so that it was highlighted. - In the Available selection list 'Main Rep..ory (OSS)' was selected - Clicked on Apply button - The Package Selection window closed almost immediately, a couple of other windows briefly flashed by (too fast to see what they said), then all windows had closed. - The yast2 command had exited with a 0 exit code, however zoo was not installed # rpm -V zoo package zoo is not installed - output in terminal # yast2 sw_single (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed (y2base:1661): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_progress_set_percentage: assertion `percentage >= 0 && percentage <= 1.0' failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User timlee@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c1
--- Comment #1 from Tim Lee
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User timlee@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c2
Tim Lee
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
Stephan Kulow
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User mmeeks@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c3
Michael Meeks
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User rpmcruz@alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c4
--- Comment #4 from Ricardo Cruz
The problem is that the information in the bottom PackageControl can get stale - since it's not flushed / hidden on package de-selection (as we see above).
Some reporter asked for it. Well, he didn't want it to get hidden... I guess we can change that, but that solution isn't good at all, because e.g. we don't set the available field insensitive if there is no package available in the repositories. We just hide it, so we'd have to change that as well. And we should clear the descriptions. I'd love to change the interface to the reporter's liking; unfortunately, we are in the Beta stage of development, so that's not possible. :P But seriously, graying out the Apply button until we have some changes sounds cool, and I guess that would remove any distraction it presents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
Ricardo Cruz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User rpmcruz@alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c5
Ricardo Cruz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
Ricardo Cruz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c6
--- Comment #6 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c7
--- Comment #7 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sontek@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c8
John Anderson
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c9
--- Comment #9 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c10
--- Comment #10 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c11
Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sshaw@decriptor.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c12
--- Comment #12 from Stephen Shaw
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c13
--- Comment #13 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User mmeeks@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c14
--- Comment #14 from Michael Meeks
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c15
--- Comment #15 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User sanfordarmstrong@gmail.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c16
--- Comment #16 from Sanford Armstrong
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User rpmcruz@alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c17
--- Comment #17 from Ricardo Cruz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
User rpmcruz@alunos.dcc.fc.up.pt added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390471#c18
Ricardo Cruz
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com