https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301358 Jeff Mahoney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jdluhos@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301358 User jdluhos@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301358#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Dluhos 2007-12-04 07:16:52 MST --- Please forgive me for the delay, I was doing something else... UPDATE: I have got the same result with SLES10 SP2 build00003. It seems that the LSB specs really want it to be inherited because a new version of the LSB tests already report it as an error. But I have still not found an exact wording in the specs itself as they refer to other standards. I will investigate more. It is very well possible that the test itself is incorrect because the error message is strange: ------------------------- /tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_A/T.execl_A 1 Unresolved Messages from the test RLIMIT_AS is not inherited correctly expected hard value -897417226; observed value 3397550070 expected soft value -897417226; observed value 3397550070 path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 2 ------------------------- The suspicious point is that 3397550070 is 0xCA827FF6 in hexadecimal, while -897417226 is (when one-extended in 64 bits) 0xFFFFFFFFCA827FF6. I suspect the test might do a sign error somewhere, but the test code is pretty convoluted and hard to trace. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.