https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184460 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184460#c7 --- Comment #7 from Carla Schroder <cschroder@suse.com> --- (In reply to Knut Alejandro Anderssen Gonz�lez from comment #5)

(In reply to Imobach Gonzalez Sosa from comment #4)

Yep, I think we should (In reply to Georg Pfuetzenreuter from comment #0)

...

4.11.4 Routing:

https://doc.opensuse.org/projects/autoyast/#CreateProfile-Network-Routing

Hello,

whilst the "netmask" Element is declared as deprecated, the Comment suggests a CIDR style netmask should be added to the destination Element. Having done that, I was faced with broken routing in both the installation stage one, as well as in the final install, as the system would NOT have a default route added. Only after removing the CIDR style netmask from the destination element (in order for it to only show the "pure" IP address of the gateway) a (working) default gateway would be present on the installation and final system.

Could you provide the routing section used? So, it was the default route and you provided something like:

<routing> <route> <destination>0.0.0.0/0</destination> <name>eth0</name> <gateway>192.168.0.1</gateway> </route> </routing>

Which could be defined as:

<routing> <route> <destination>default</destination> <name>eth0</name> <gateway>192.168.0.1</gateway> </route> </routing>

In that case I agree that we should explain it better in the routing section and in case of a default route using the CIDR format we should initialize the route correctly.

I am lost :) What do you mean by "initialize the route"? Does https://doc.opensuse.org/projects/autoyast/#ex-ay-network-config-general provide a correct example of configuring routing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.