![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712173 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712173#c5 Marcus Rückert <mrueckert@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mls@suse.com, | |mrueckert@suse.com InfoProvider|mrueckert@suse.com |maint-coord@suse.de --- Comment #5 from Marcus Rückert <mrueckert@suse.com> 2014-03-18 15:47:58 UTC --- I think this question is more for the rpm maintainer and the maintenance team: do we want to backport newer macros into sles 11 RPM and release it as update? IMHO it is fine as long as we don't change existing macros. but adding new ones shouldn't break anything. we could put them into /etc/rpm/macros.backport We could just do it inside the prjconf but then rebuilding with rpmbuild wouldnt work anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.