https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859105 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859105#c2 --- Comment #2 from Michael Friedrich <michael.friedrich@gmail.com> 2014-01-19 01:42:58 UTC --- Sorry for the offensive phrasing, I made the same mistake on the linked RHEL bug, and rephrased the text later on for other upstream maintainers. FreeBSD & OpenBSD changed their upstream URLs already. In terms of upgrading the package I do see the same problem as outlined here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054340#c26 as the sources provided on nagios-plugins.org are different to what the SUSE package history is built on. User upgrading their packages trust these packages, and a newly formed upstream source is totally different. Especially since the new Nagios Plugin Development Team is unknown - no git commits, no further announcements other than taking over the project. And yet no evidence or proof how the nagios plugins project will continue. Though I welcome the idea to change packages and locations to a more generic version, and that's probably the same outcome as Fedora/RHEL will provide. Only the upgrade problematic should be handled properly, to keep the users safe. Nagios Enterprises has proven itself not to be trustworthy, nor predictable in their actions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.