https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258#c7 Dmitry Markov <werwolf131313@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Flags|needinfo?(sturm-fr@web.de) | --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Markov <werwolf131313@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ivan Ivanov from comment #6)
(In reply to Dmitry Markov from comment #5)
(In reply to Ivan Ivanov from comment #4)
(In reply to Dmitry Markov from comment #3)
Should this be regarded as a refusal or an impossibility? I reopened the report to get a final answer like "this will never be done because..." or "this will be done in such and such a release"
Please read comment#1 in bsc#1189456 for an explanation.
does this mean that I should have reopened not this request but bsc#1189456 with the same question? Sorry, I really didn't understand.
To be considerd for enabling "Android IPC" should be able to be build as "loadable modules". This is not currently possible. This should be "fixed" upstream first (like in the Linus Torvalds tree).
CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_IPC=m
oh, now I understand. required kernel modules cannot be built as loadable ones. Thanks for clarifying. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1189456 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.