http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537980 User max@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537980#c16 --- Comment #16 from Reinhard Max <max@novell.com> 2009-11-12 08:56:52 MST --- (In reply to comment #13)
Hmm, it is consistent with 2nd stage fw proposal and yast2-firewall in general - if fw is disabled, it does not make sense for any services to open ports in it
I am not asking for being able to open ports in a disabled firewall, but for being able to enable the sshd service regardless of the firewall setting.
Maybe the wording of the ssh option could change from "open and enable" to just "enable" when the firewall gets deselected,
The wording here is based on _Marcus_'s proposal in comment #4, to "avoid bloat".
Yes, the wording is OK as long as the firewall is on. What I was trying to say is, that instead of greying out or removing the ssh option when the firewall is disabled, just remove the port part of the wording. So, initially the options would read: * Firewall is enabled (disable) * SSH service is disabled and closed in firewall (enable and open) And when the firewall gets disabled, they change to: * Firewall is disabled (enable) * SSH service is disabled (enable) Does that make things clearer? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.