http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201010 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201010#c6 Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(fcrozat@suse.com) | --- Comment #6 from Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> --- (In reply to Robert Schweikert from comment #4)
Hold on that doesn't make any sense to me what so ever. NM does not handle the underlying connections, i.e. NM does not make DHCP requests etc. That happens via wicked or via dhcpclient.
If we are dropping wicked are we going back to dhcpclient?
no, systemd has its own dhcp client (in fact, import of systemd-networkd code). Or it can use dhcp-client or other dhcp clients.
What happens to our sysconfig layout and the values we set in sysconfig?
It depends which settings you are talking about. BTW, latest version of cloud-init upstream landed NM in May (to handle NM config file natively, as Fedora is moving away from ifcfg files).
As a side note wicked is required by a lot of packages in the Public Cloud area, we need a running network.
and I don't see why you don't get one with NM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.