![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073187 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073187#c1 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.com> --- The functions you annotate are static and thus may be optimized out by the compiler for example via inlining. You could say if a section is omitted then it's size is zero (the function was inlined somewhere you don't account separately). You could "deal" with this by using -fno-inline to disable any inlining. But then for example IPA optimization might choose to duplicate such function, specalizing it for a caller with constant arguments for example. Then such section would have two copies of the function. -fno-ipa-cp-clone would avoid that. Note this isn't a bug thus bugzilla isn't really the correct forum to ask this kind of questions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.