http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089349 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089349#c8 Neil Brown <nfbrown@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nfbrown@suse.com) | --- Comment #8 from Neil Brown <nfbrown@suse.com> --- It is safe for overlayfs to ignore the system.nfs4_acl attribute (which is not empty btw). It is informational only. I would be a bit more comfortable with the patch if it was conditional on the attribute name starting "system.", and/or if it was upstream. There should be no security risk that - falling back on the mode bits for access checks should always be more restrictive (I hope). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.