https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683476 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683476#c7 --- Comment #7 from Johannes Meixner <jsmeix@novell.com> 2011-04-01 09:49:28 UTC --- What is of interest in attachment #422347 regarding processing a print job: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I [30/Mar/2011:22:18:50 -0400] [Job 1] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops (PID 13967) I [30/Mar/2011:22:18:50 -0400] [Job 1] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstoufr2cpca (PID 13968) I [30/Mar/2011:22:18:50 -0400] [Job 1] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/cnusb (PID 13969) .. D [30/Mar/2011:22:18:50 -0400] PID 13967 (/usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops) exited with no errors. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- But up to [30/Mar/2011:22:19:20 -0400] there are no further messages what happened to Canon's driver (PID 13968) and Canon's backend (PID 13969). It seems about half a minute later Canon's driver and Canon's backend are still running - otherwise the cupsd would have reported something regarding "PID 13968" and "PID 13969". There are also no messages which indicate an error while Canon's driver and Canon's backend are running. When it fails the same with Fedora 15 it indicates that Canon's proprietary stuff may depend on whatever details of previous versions of whatever open source software (e.g. Ghostscript or whatever else might be used by Canon) so that Canon's driver should be adapted accordingly. I assume sooner or later Canon may notice this and then Canon may provide an update of their driver.
From my point of view I cannot do anything more here.
Nevertheless I would appreciate it if you coud provide feedback what came out at the end because I am interested in which way Canon actually supports their proprietary driver for Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.