https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726924 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726924#c1 Lars Vogdt <lrupp@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |lrupp@suse.com InfoProvider| |darin@darins.net --- Comment #1 from Lars Vogdt <lrupp@suse.com> 2011-10-30 09:21:35 CET --- (In reply to comment #0)
I don't know if you're interested in this, but would you be willing to have the request-tracker package include in the devel:languages:perl repository? [...]
If not d:l:p perhaps another repository? I've been perusing the repo server and the closest thing I've been able to find was server:php:applications, maybe creating server:perl:applications or server:perl:request-tracker would be more appropriate.
Good question, indeed. * RT is similar to OTRS - which lives in network:otrs. * RT used a lot of perl modules (koha in Education repo also does) Having RT in d:l:p is maybe not where people start their search, but they would be able to install RT with just one additional repository enabled. So I like to follow your suggestion and place RT in d:l:p once it is usable. Maybe we should request something like perl:applications later, if the amount of applications is growing. Back to you: do you think the current request-tracker package in home:lrupp:request-tracker _is_ usable? Should it be renamed as "request-tracker4" or "rt4" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.