https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232403 trenn@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |behlert@novell.com ------- Comment #6 from trenn@novell.com 2007-01-13 05:40 MST -------
Return(Package(0x02){0x00, 0x00}) but this maybe is of secondary importance... Yes this should not hurt.
Not returning a value on _STA (status) method of a device seems to affect s2ram. This possibly can be workarounded in kernel, I will have a look. But as said, there are higher priority bugs I have to look at first. AFAIK we don't have much (any?) contact to Acer... but it may be worth a try, especially because the Intel firmwarekit BIOS test (http://linuxfirmwarekit.org) should exactly throw this error at exactly the DSDT lines (it's a simple disassemble and recompile of DSDT with Intel's iasl tools) and the fix is save in regards to M$ OS. Stefan, could you give it a try to contact ACER, maybe we have more luck when Novell is asking... or just remove the NEEDINFO tag if you think it's worthless... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.