https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893787 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893787#c18 Neil Brown <nfbrown@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED InfoProvider|lars.behrens@pi.uka.de | Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #18 from Neil Brown <nfbrown@suse.com> 2014-09-03 01:22:50 UTC --- That "Unknown error" is the problem. 4261412863 is 0xFDFFFFFF which is -3 in the wrong byte-order. '3' is ESRCH, which is a little surprising. Definitely a server-side bug though. (downloads Debian kernel patch .... looked through -stable branch...) Oh. 2.6.32-stable contains: commit 63d059e73ff4574b79bd8aa252b5fc00b6326ddf Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Date: Wed Feb 16 13:08:35 2011 +1100 nfsd: correctly handle return value from nfsd_map_name_to_* commit 47c85291d3dd1a51501555000b90f8e281a0458e upstream. These functions return an nfs status, not a host_err. So don't try to convert before returning. This is a regression introduced by 3c726023402a2f3b28f49b9d90ebf9e71151157d; I fixed up two of the callers, but missed these two. But it does *not* contain that patch which introduced the regression. If you fix a bug without introducing the bug first.. that ain't good. You should probably report the bug to Debian. I'll report it to -stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.