https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217368 bluedzins@wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | ------- Comment #8 from bluedzins@wp.pl 2006-11-15 03:16 MST -------
If I sax no I'm still in sax. Ok at that point there is a ok button to be able to repeat the complete procedure and a cancel button to exit sax. But this cancel button couldn't revert the already written configuration. I thought this would be clear as you intentionally clicked on "save" some time before
As I said -- it is design flaw -- there are to many points for "accepting". In this situation "cancel" does not mean cancel, but rather "commit". It is bad (to redefine words). My suggestion: * if OK means test it should be named like this --> "test" * if cancel means close it should be named like this --> "close" * there should be cancel button anyway named... well, cancel :-) and it should be able to revert changes, after all you have undo in text editors which can cancel last changes even if you saved your file on disk. And when you get back from Sax there should be no such dialog, you are just back to the graph.card module dialog. Then you have three crystal clear choices -- close the thing, cancel changes or test something more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.