https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178797 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178797#c19 Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(aherrmann@suse.co | |m) | --- Comment #19 from Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> --- (In reply to Franck Bui from comment #18)
(In reply to Andreas Herrmann from comment #17)
Depends on whether the rules file is used also with an older kernel still supporting the legacy block layer. (E.g. someone installing an old kernel)
Well as a kernel guy, you probably know better than us ;)
Thought more about it. I think keeping the legacy rules (for CFQ and deadline) in there and moving the elevator check after blk-mq rule is the safer approach. In case someone boots an old kernel with legacy block layer support it works as usual.
Also can you please submit your changes to relevant projects ?
I'll do. I am just waiting for some other problem to be settled which also (most likely) requires a change in 60-io-scheduler.rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.